Cargando…

Can pelvic node dissection at radical prostatectomy influence the nodal recurrence at salvage lymphadenectomy for prostate cancer?

PURPOSE: To verify the quality of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) performed at radical prostatectomy (RP) and its impact on nodal recurrence in patients undergoing salvage lymph node dissection (sLND). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of 48 patients who underwent sLND for presumed nod...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sivaraman, Arjun, Benfante, Nicole, Touijer, Karim, Coleman, Jonathan, Scardino, Peter, Laudone, Vincent, Eastham, James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Urological Association 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5840122/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29520383
http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/icu.2018.59.2.83
_version_ 1783304510674829312
author Sivaraman, Arjun
Benfante, Nicole
Touijer, Karim
Coleman, Jonathan
Scardino, Peter
Laudone, Vincent
Eastham, James
author_facet Sivaraman, Arjun
Benfante, Nicole
Touijer, Karim
Coleman, Jonathan
Scardino, Peter
Laudone, Vincent
Eastham, James
author_sort Sivaraman, Arjun
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To verify the quality of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) performed at radical prostatectomy (RP) and its impact on nodal recurrence in patients undergoing salvage lymph node dissection (sLND). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of 48 patients who underwent sLND for presumed nodal recurrence, to describe the PLND characteristics at RP and correlate the anatomical sites and number of suspicious nodes reported in radiological imaging and final pathology of sLND. RESULTS: Overall, at RP, 8 (16.7%) did not undergo PLND, 32 (66.7%) and 8 (16.7%) received a “limited” (between external iliac vein and obturator nerve) and an “extended” (external iliac, hypogastric, and obturator) dissection, respectively. Median nodes removed during limited and extended dissection were 2 and 24, respectively. At sLND, the mean age was 61.3 years and median prostate specific antigen (PSA) was 1.07 ng/mL. Median nodes removed at sLND were 17 with a median of 2 positive nodes. Recurrent nodes were identified within the template of an extended PLND in 62.5%, 50.0% and 12.5% patients, respectively, following prior no, limited and extended dissection at RP. Recurrence outside the expected lymphatic drainage pathway was noted in 37.5% patients with prior extended dissection at RP. There was a correlation between imaging and pathology specimen in 83% for node location and 58.3% for number of anatomical sites involved. CONCLUSIONS: In prostate cancer patients undergoing sLND, most had inadequate PLND at the original RP. Pattern of nodal recurrence may be influenced by the prior dissection and pre sLND imaging appears to underestimate the nodal recurrence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5840122
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The Korean Urological Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58401222018-03-08 Can pelvic node dissection at radical prostatectomy influence the nodal recurrence at salvage lymphadenectomy for prostate cancer? Sivaraman, Arjun Benfante, Nicole Touijer, Karim Coleman, Jonathan Scardino, Peter Laudone, Vincent Eastham, James Investig Clin Urol Original Article PURPOSE: To verify the quality of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) performed at radical prostatectomy (RP) and its impact on nodal recurrence in patients undergoing salvage lymph node dissection (sLND). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of 48 patients who underwent sLND for presumed nodal recurrence, to describe the PLND characteristics at RP and correlate the anatomical sites and number of suspicious nodes reported in radiological imaging and final pathology of sLND. RESULTS: Overall, at RP, 8 (16.7%) did not undergo PLND, 32 (66.7%) and 8 (16.7%) received a “limited” (between external iliac vein and obturator nerve) and an “extended” (external iliac, hypogastric, and obturator) dissection, respectively. Median nodes removed during limited and extended dissection were 2 and 24, respectively. At sLND, the mean age was 61.3 years and median prostate specific antigen (PSA) was 1.07 ng/mL. Median nodes removed at sLND were 17 with a median of 2 positive nodes. Recurrent nodes were identified within the template of an extended PLND in 62.5%, 50.0% and 12.5% patients, respectively, following prior no, limited and extended dissection at RP. Recurrence outside the expected lymphatic drainage pathway was noted in 37.5% patients with prior extended dissection at RP. There was a correlation between imaging and pathology specimen in 83% for node location and 58.3% for number of anatomical sites involved. CONCLUSIONS: In prostate cancer patients undergoing sLND, most had inadequate PLND at the original RP. Pattern of nodal recurrence may be influenced by the prior dissection and pre sLND imaging appears to underestimate the nodal recurrence. The Korean Urological Association 2018-03 2018-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5840122/ /pubmed/29520383 http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/icu.2018.59.2.83 Text en © The Korean Urological Association, 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sivaraman, Arjun
Benfante, Nicole
Touijer, Karim
Coleman, Jonathan
Scardino, Peter
Laudone, Vincent
Eastham, James
Can pelvic node dissection at radical prostatectomy influence the nodal recurrence at salvage lymphadenectomy for prostate cancer?
title Can pelvic node dissection at radical prostatectomy influence the nodal recurrence at salvage lymphadenectomy for prostate cancer?
title_full Can pelvic node dissection at radical prostatectomy influence the nodal recurrence at salvage lymphadenectomy for prostate cancer?
title_fullStr Can pelvic node dissection at radical prostatectomy influence the nodal recurrence at salvage lymphadenectomy for prostate cancer?
title_full_unstemmed Can pelvic node dissection at radical prostatectomy influence the nodal recurrence at salvage lymphadenectomy for prostate cancer?
title_short Can pelvic node dissection at radical prostatectomy influence the nodal recurrence at salvage lymphadenectomy for prostate cancer?
title_sort can pelvic node dissection at radical prostatectomy influence the nodal recurrence at salvage lymphadenectomy for prostate cancer?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5840122/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29520383
http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/icu.2018.59.2.83
work_keys_str_mv AT sivaramanarjun canpelvicnodedissectionatradicalprostatectomyinfluencethenodalrecurrenceatsalvagelymphadenectomyforprostatecancer
AT benfantenicole canpelvicnodedissectionatradicalprostatectomyinfluencethenodalrecurrenceatsalvagelymphadenectomyforprostatecancer
AT touijerkarim canpelvicnodedissectionatradicalprostatectomyinfluencethenodalrecurrenceatsalvagelymphadenectomyforprostatecancer
AT colemanjonathan canpelvicnodedissectionatradicalprostatectomyinfluencethenodalrecurrenceatsalvagelymphadenectomyforprostatecancer
AT scardinopeter canpelvicnodedissectionatradicalprostatectomyinfluencethenodalrecurrenceatsalvagelymphadenectomyforprostatecancer
AT laudonevincent canpelvicnodedissectionatradicalprostatectomyinfluencethenodalrecurrenceatsalvagelymphadenectomyforprostatecancer
AT easthamjames canpelvicnodedissectionatradicalprostatectomyinfluencethenodalrecurrenceatsalvagelymphadenectomyforprostatecancer