Cargando…
Can Machines Learn Respiratory Virus Epidemiology?: A Comparative Study of Likelihood-Free Methods for the Estimation of Epidemiological Dynamics
To estimate and predict the transmission dynamics of respiratory viruses, the estimation of the basic reproduction number, R(0), is essential. Recently, approximate Bayesian computation methods have been used as likelihood free methods to estimate epidemiological model parameters, particularly R(0)....
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5840242/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29552000 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00343 |
_version_ | 1783304537817219072 |
---|---|
author | Tessmer, Heidi L. Ito, Kimihito Omori, Ryosuke |
author_facet | Tessmer, Heidi L. Ito, Kimihito Omori, Ryosuke |
author_sort | Tessmer, Heidi L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | To estimate and predict the transmission dynamics of respiratory viruses, the estimation of the basic reproduction number, R(0), is essential. Recently, approximate Bayesian computation methods have been used as likelihood free methods to estimate epidemiological model parameters, particularly R(0). In this paper, we explore various machine learning approaches, the multi-layer perceptron, convolutional neural network, and long-short term memory, to learn and estimate the parameters. Further, we compare the accuracy of the estimates and time requirements for machine learning and the approximate Bayesian computation methods on both simulated and real-world epidemiological data from outbreaks of influenza A(H1N1)pdm09, mumps, and measles. We find that the machine learning approaches can be verified and tested faster than the approximate Bayesian computation method, but that the approximate Bayesian computation method is more robust across different datasets. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5840242 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58402422018-03-16 Can Machines Learn Respiratory Virus Epidemiology?: A Comparative Study of Likelihood-Free Methods for the Estimation of Epidemiological Dynamics Tessmer, Heidi L. Ito, Kimihito Omori, Ryosuke Front Microbiol Microbiology To estimate and predict the transmission dynamics of respiratory viruses, the estimation of the basic reproduction number, R(0), is essential. Recently, approximate Bayesian computation methods have been used as likelihood free methods to estimate epidemiological model parameters, particularly R(0). In this paper, we explore various machine learning approaches, the multi-layer perceptron, convolutional neural network, and long-short term memory, to learn and estimate the parameters. Further, we compare the accuracy of the estimates and time requirements for machine learning and the approximate Bayesian computation methods on both simulated and real-world epidemiological data from outbreaks of influenza A(H1N1)pdm09, mumps, and measles. We find that the machine learning approaches can be verified and tested faster than the approximate Bayesian computation method, but that the approximate Bayesian computation method is more robust across different datasets. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5840242/ /pubmed/29552000 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00343 Text en Copyright © 2018 Tessmer, Ito and Omori. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Microbiology Tessmer, Heidi L. Ito, Kimihito Omori, Ryosuke Can Machines Learn Respiratory Virus Epidemiology?: A Comparative Study of Likelihood-Free Methods for the Estimation of Epidemiological Dynamics |
title | Can Machines Learn Respiratory Virus Epidemiology?: A Comparative Study of Likelihood-Free Methods for the Estimation of Epidemiological Dynamics |
title_full | Can Machines Learn Respiratory Virus Epidemiology?: A Comparative Study of Likelihood-Free Methods for the Estimation of Epidemiological Dynamics |
title_fullStr | Can Machines Learn Respiratory Virus Epidemiology?: A Comparative Study of Likelihood-Free Methods for the Estimation of Epidemiological Dynamics |
title_full_unstemmed | Can Machines Learn Respiratory Virus Epidemiology?: A Comparative Study of Likelihood-Free Methods for the Estimation of Epidemiological Dynamics |
title_short | Can Machines Learn Respiratory Virus Epidemiology?: A Comparative Study of Likelihood-Free Methods for the Estimation of Epidemiological Dynamics |
title_sort | can machines learn respiratory virus epidemiology?: a comparative study of likelihood-free methods for the estimation of epidemiological dynamics |
topic | Microbiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5840242/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29552000 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00343 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tessmerheidil canmachineslearnrespiratoryvirusepidemiologyacomparativestudyoflikelihoodfreemethodsfortheestimationofepidemiologicaldynamics AT itokimihito canmachineslearnrespiratoryvirusepidemiologyacomparativestudyoflikelihoodfreemethodsfortheestimationofepidemiologicaldynamics AT omoriryosuke canmachineslearnrespiratoryvirusepidemiologyacomparativestudyoflikelihoodfreemethodsfortheestimationofepidemiologicaldynamics |