Cargando…

Cannabinoid Receptors Modulate Excitation of an Olfactory Bulb Local Circuit by Cortical Feedback

Recent studies have provided evidence that corticofugal feedback (CFF) from the olfactory cortex to the olfactory bulb (OB) can significantly impact the state of excitation of output mitral cells (MCs) and tufted cells (TCs) and also modulate neural synchrony. Interpreting these effects however has...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pouille, Frederic, Schoppa, Nathan E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5840260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29551963
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2018.00047
Descripción
Sumario:Recent studies have provided evidence that corticofugal feedback (CFF) from the olfactory cortex to the olfactory bulb (OB) can significantly impact the state of excitation of output mitral cells (MCs) and tufted cells (TCs) and also modulate neural synchrony. Interpreting these effects however has been complicated by the large number of cell targets of CFF axons in the bulb. Within the granule cell layer (GCL) alone, CFF axons target both GABAergic granule cells (GCs) as well as GABAergic deep short-axon cells (dSACs) that inhibit GCs. Because GCs are a major source of inhibition of MCs/TCs, CFF could be inhibitory to MCs (by exciting GCs) or disinhibitory (by exciting dSACs that inhibit GCs). In this study, we used patch-clamp recordings combined with optogenetic and electrical stimulation methods to investigate the role of presynaptic cannabinoid receptors in regulating CFF pathways, which could alter the weights of inhibition and disinhibition. Recording first from dSACs, we found that the cannabinoid receptor (CB-R) agonist WIN-55212.2 (WIN) reduced excitatory post-synaptic currents (CFF-EPSCs) driven by stimulation of CFF axons. The effects were reversed by the Type 1 CB-R (CB(1)-R)-specific antagonist SR-141716A. Furthermore, prolonged 5-s depolarizations applied to postsynaptic dSACs effectively reduced CFF-EPSCs in a CB(1)-R-dependent fashion, providing evidence for depolarization-induced suppression of excitation (DSE) at CFF-to-dSAC synapses. Further analysis indicated that CB(1)-Rs mediate widespread suppressive effects on synaptic transmission, occurring at CFF synapses onto different dSAC subtypes and CFF synapses onto GCs. Feedforward excitation of dSACs, mediated by MCs/TCs, however, was not impacted by CB(1)-Rs. In recordings from MCs, performed to examine the net effect of CB(1)-R activation on GC-to-MC transmission, we found that WIN could both increase and decrease disynaptic inhibition evoked by CFF axon stimulation. The exact effect depended on the size of the inhibitory response, reflecting the local balance of dSAC vs. GC activation. Our results taken together indicate that CB(1)-Rs can bidirectionally alter the weighting of inhibition and disinhibition of MCs through their effects on CFF pathways.