Cargando…

Effects of propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia on gastric cancer: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND: Several kinds of cancer surgeries with propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) have been shown to have better outcomes than those with sevoflurane-based inhalational anesthesia (INHA). However, the effects of this anesthetic technique have not been investigated in patients wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zheng, Xiaoyu, Wang, Yu, Dong, Linlin, Zhao, Su, Wang, Liping, Chen, Hong, Xu, Yang, Wang, Guonian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5840299/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29535538
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S156792
_version_ 1783304549994332160
author Zheng, Xiaoyu
Wang, Yu
Dong, Linlin
Zhao, Su
Wang, Liping
Chen, Hong
Xu, Yang
Wang, Guonian
author_facet Zheng, Xiaoyu
Wang, Yu
Dong, Linlin
Zhao, Su
Wang, Liping
Chen, Hong
Xu, Yang
Wang, Guonian
author_sort Zheng, Xiaoyu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Several kinds of cancer surgeries with propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) have been shown to have better outcomes than those with sevoflurane-based inhalational anesthesia (INHA). However, the effects of this anesthetic technique have not been investigated in patients with gastric cancer. In this study, the authors retrospectively examined the link between the choice of anesthetic technique and overall survival in patients undergoing gastric cancer resection. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the database of all patients undergoing gastric cancer resection for gastric cancer between 2007 and 2012. Patients who received TIVA or INHA were administered patient-controlled intravenous analgesia for 72–120 hours postoperatively. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier log-rank test, and associations between anesthetic technique and outcomes were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regressions after propensity matching. RESULTS: A total of 2,856 anesthetics using INHA or TIVA were delivered in the study period. After propensity matching, 897 patients remained in each group. According to Kaplan–Meier analysis, the use of TIVA was associated with improved survival (P<0.001). TIVA was associated with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.67 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.58–0.77) for death in univariate analysis and 0.65 (95% CI: 0.56–0.75) after a multivariate analysis of known confounders in the matched group. Cancer stage (HR =0.74, 95% CI: 0.64–0.86, P<0.001) and degree of differentiation (HR =1.28, 95% CI: 1.11–1.47, P<0.001) were also associated with survival in the univariate analysis in the matched group. In the multivariable Cox model, cancer stage (HR =0.72, 95% CI: 0.62–0.84, P<0.001) and degree of differentiation (HR =1.23, 95% CI: 1.07–1.42, P<0.001) were associated with survival in the matched group. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that TIVA may be associated with improved survival in gastric cancer patients who undergo resection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5840299
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58402992018-03-13 Effects of propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia on gastric cancer: a retrospective study Zheng, Xiaoyu Wang, Yu Dong, Linlin Zhao, Su Wang, Liping Chen, Hong Xu, Yang Wang, Guonian Onco Targets Ther Original Research BACKGROUND: Several kinds of cancer surgeries with propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) have been shown to have better outcomes than those with sevoflurane-based inhalational anesthesia (INHA). However, the effects of this anesthetic technique have not been investigated in patients with gastric cancer. In this study, the authors retrospectively examined the link between the choice of anesthetic technique and overall survival in patients undergoing gastric cancer resection. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the database of all patients undergoing gastric cancer resection for gastric cancer between 2007 and 2012. Patients who received TIVA or INHA were administered patient-controlled intravenous analgesia for 72–120 hours postoperatively. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier log-rank test, and associations between anesthetic technique and outcomes were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regressions after propensity matching. RESULTS: A total of 2,856 anesthetics using INHA or TIVA were delivered in the study period. After propensity matching, 897 patients remained in each group. According to Kaplan–Meier analysis, the use of TIVA was associated with improved survival (P<0.001). TIVA was associated with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.67 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.58–0.77) for death in univariate analysis and 0.65 (95% CI: 0.56–0.75) after a multivariate analysis of known confounders in the matched group. Cancer stage (HR =0.74, 95% CI: 0.64–0.86, P<0.001) and degree of differentiation (HR =1.28, 95% CI: 1.11–1.47, P<0.001) were also associated with survival in the univariate analysis in the matched group. In the multivariable Cox model, cancer stage (HR =0.72, 95% CI: 0.62–0.84, P<0.001) and degree of differentiation (HR =1.23, 95% CI: 1.07–1.42, P<0.001) were associated with survival in the matched group. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that TIVA may be associated with improved survival in gastric cancer patients who undergo resection. Dove Medical Press 2018-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5840299/ /pubmed/29535538 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S156792 Text en © 2018 Zheng et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Zheng, Xiaoyu
Wang, Yu
Dong, Linlin
Zhao, Su
Wang, Liping
Chen, Hong
Xu, Yang
Wang, Guonian
Effects of propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia on gastric cancer: a retrospective study
title Effects of propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia on gastric cancer: a retrospective study
title_full Effects of propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia on gastric cancer: a retrospective study
title_fullStr Effects of propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia on gastric cancer: a retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Effects of propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia on gastric cancer: a retrospective study
title_short Effects of propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia on gastric cancer: a retrospective study
title_sort effects of propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia on gastric cancer: a retrospective study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5840299/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29535538
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S156792
work_keys_str_mv AT zhengxiaoyu effectsofpropofolbasedtotalintravenousanesthesiaongastriccanceraretrospectivestudy
AT wangyu effectsofpropofolbasedtotalintravenousanesthesiaongastriccanceraretrospectivestudy
AT donglinlin effectsofpropofolbasedtotalintravenousanesthesiaongastriccanceraretrospectivestudy
AT zhaosu effectsofpropofolbasedtotalintravenousanesthesiaongastriccanceraretrospectivestudy
AT wangliping effectsofpropofolbasedtotalintravenousanesthesiaongastriccanceraretrospectivestudy
AT chenhong effectsofpropofolbasedtotalintravenousanesthesiaongastriccanceraretrospectivestudy
AT xuyang effectsofpropofolbasedtotalintravenousanesthesiaongastriccanceraretrospectivestudy
AT wangguonian effectsofpropofolbasedtotalintravenousanesthesiaongastriccanceraretrospectivestudy