Cargando…

Small-scale field evaluation of push-pull system against early- and outdoor-biting malaria mosquitoes in an area of high pyrethroid resistance in Tanzania

Background: Despite high coverage of indoor interventions like insecticide-treated nets, mosquito-borne infections persist, partly because of outdoor-biting, early-biting and insecticide-resistant vectors. Push-pull systems, where mosquitoes are repelled from humans and attracted to nearby lethal ta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mmbando, Arnold S., Ngowo, Halfan S., Kilalangongono, Masoud, Abbas, Said, Matowo, Nancy S., Moore, Sarah J., Okumu, Fredros O.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000 Research Limited 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5840620/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29568808
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.13006.1
_version_ 1783304614418841600
author Mmbando, Arnold S.
Ngowo, Halfan S.
Kilalangongono, Masoud
Abbas, Said
Matowo, Nancy S.
Moore, Sarah J.
Okumu, Fredros O.
author_facet Mmbando, Arnold S.
Ngowo, Halfan S.
Kilalangongono, Masoud
Abbas, Said
Matowo, Nancy S.
Moore, Sarah J.
Okumu, Fredros O.
author_sort Mmbando, Arnold S.
collection PubMed
description Background: Despite high coverage of indoor interventions like insecticide-treated nets, mosquito-borne infections persist, partly because of outdoor-biting, early-biting and insecticide-resistant vectors. Push-pull systems, where mosquitoes are repelled from humans and attracted to nearby lethal targets, may constitute effective complementary interventions. Methods: A partially randomized cross-over design was used to test efficacy of push-pull in four experimental huts and four local houses, in an area with high pyrethroid resistance in Tanzania. The push-pull system consisted of 1.1% or 2.2% w/v transfluthrin repellent dispensers and an outdoor lure-and-kill device (odour-baited mosquito landing box). Matching controls were set up without push-pull. Adult male volunteers collected mosquitoes attempting to bite them outdoors, but collections were also done indoors using exit traps in experimental huts and by volunteers in the local houses. The collections were done hourly (1830hrs-0730hrs) and mosquito catches compared between push-pull and controls. An. gambiae s.l. and An. funestus s.l. were assessed by PCR to identify sibling species, and ELISA to detect Plasmodium falciparum and blood meal sources. Results: Push-pull in experimental huts reduced outdoor-biting for An. arabiensis and Mansonia species by 30% and 41.5% respectively. However, the reductions were marginal and insignificant for An. funestus (12.2%; p>0.05) and Culex (5%; p>0.05). Highest protection against all species occurred before 2200hrs. There was no significant difference in number of mosquitoes inside exit traps in huts with or without push-pull. In local households, push-pull significantly reduced indoor and outdoor-biting of An. arabiensis by 48% and 25% respectively, but had no effect on other species. Conclusion: This push-pull system offered modest protection against outdoor-biting An. arabiensis, without increasing indoor mosquito densities. Additional experimentation is required to assess how transfluthrin-based products affect mosquito blood-feeding and mortality in push-pull contexts. This approach, if optimised, could potentially complement existing malaria interventions even in areas with high pyrethroid resistance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5840620
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher F1000 Research Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58406202018-03-21 Small-scale field evaluation of push-pull system against early- and outdoor-biting malaria mosquitoes in an area of high pyrethroid resistance in Tanzania Mmbando, Arnold S. Ngowo, Halfan S. Kilalangongono, Masoud Abbas, Said Matowo, Nancy S. Moore, Sarah J. Okumu, Fredros O. Wellcome Open Res Research Article Background: Despite high coverage of indoor interventions like insecticide-treated nets, mosquito-borne infections persist, partly because of outdoor-biting, early-biting and insecticide-resistant vectors. Push-pull systems, where mosquitoes are repelled from humans and attracted to nearby lethal targets, may constitute effective complementary interventions. Methods: A partially randomized cross-over design was used to test efficacy of push-pull in four experimental huts and four local houses, in an area with high pyrethroid resistance in Tanzania. The push-pull system consisted of 1.1% or 2.2% w/v transfluthrin repellent dispensers and an outdoor lure-and-kill device (odour-baited mosquito landing box). Matching controls were set up without push-pull. Adult male volunteers collected mosquitoes attempting to bite them outdoors, but collections were also done indoors using exit traps in experimental huts and by volunteers in the local houses. The collections were done hourly (1830hrs-0730hrs) and mosquito catches compared between push-pull and controls. An. gambiae s.l. and An. funestus s.l. were assessed by PCR to identify sibling species, and ELISA to detect Plasmodium falciparum and blood meal sources. Results: Push-pull in experimental huts reduced outdoor-biting for An. arabiensis and Mansonia species by 30% and 41.5% respectively. However, the reductions were marginal and insignificant for An. funestus (12.2%; p>0.05) and Culex (5%; p>0.05). Highest protection against all species occurred before 2200hrs. There was no significant difference in number of mosquitoes inside exit traps in huts with or without push-pull. In local households, push-pull significantly reduced indoor and outdoor-biting of An. arabiensis by 48% and 25% respectively, but had no effect on other species. Conclusion: This push-pull system offered modest protection against outdoor-biting An. arabiensis, without increasing indoor mosquito densities. Additional experimentation is required to assess how transfluthrin-based products affect mosquito blood-feeding and mortality in push-pull contexts. This approach, if optimised, could potentially complement existing malaria interventions even in areas with high pyrethroid resistance. F1000 Research Limited 2017-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5840620/ /pubmed/29568808 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.13006.1 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Mmbando AS et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mmbando, Arnold S.
Ngowo, Halfan S.
Kilalangongono, Masoud
Abbas, Said
Matowo, Nancy S.
Moore, Sarah J.
Okumu, Fredros O.
Small-scale field evaluation of push-pull system against early- and outdoor-biting malaria mosquitoes in an area of high pyrethroid resistance in Tanzania
title Small-scale field evaluation of push-pull system against early- and outdoor-biting malaria mosquitoes in an area of high pyrethroid resistance in Tanzania
title_full Small-scale field evaluation of push-pull system against early- and outdoor-biting malaria mosquitoes in an area of high pyrethroid resistance in Tanzania
title_fullStr Small-scale field evaluation of push-pull system against early- and outdoor-biting malaria mosquitoes in an area of high pyrethroid resistance in Tanzania
title_full_unstemmed Small-scale field evaluation of push-pull system against early- and outdoor-biting malaria mosquitoes in an area of high pyrethroid resistance in Tanzania
title_short Small-scale field evaluation of push-pull system against early- and outdoor-biting malaria mosquitoes in an area of high pyrethroid resistance in Tanzania
title_sort small-scale field evaluation of push-pull system against early- and outdoor-biting malaria mosquitoes in an area of high pyrethroid resistance in tanzania
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5840620/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29568808
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.13006.1
work_keys_str_mv AT mmbandoarnolds smallscalefieldevaluationofpushpullsystemagainstearlyandoutdoorbitingmalariamosquitoesinanareaofhighpyrethroidresistanceintanzania
AT ngowohalfans smallscalefieldevaluationofpushpullsystemagainstearlyandoutdoorbitingmalariamosquitoesinanareaofhighpyrethroidresistanceintanzania
AT kilalangongonomasoud smallscalefieldevaluationofpushpullsystemagainstearlyandoutdoorbitingmalariamosquitoesinanareaofhighpyrethroidresistanceintanzania
AT abbassaid smallscalefieldevaluationofpushpullsystemagainstearlyandoutdoorbitingmalariamosquitoesinanareaofhighpyrethroidresistanceintanzania
AT matowonancys smallscalefieldevaluationofpushpullsystemagainstearlyandoutdoorbitingmalariamosquitoesinanareaofhighpyrethroidresistanceintanzania
AT mooresarahj smallscalefieldevaluationofpushpullsystemagainstearlyandoutdoorbitingmalariamosquitoesinanareaofhighpyrethroidresistanceintanzania
AT okumufredroso smallscalefieldevaluationofpushpullsystemagainstearlyandoutdoorbitingmalariamosquitoesinanareaofhighpyrethroidresistanceintanzania