Cargando…
Effect of Tactile Stimulation on Termination and Prevention of Apnea of Prematurity: A Systematic Review
Apnea of prematurity (AOP) is one of the most common diagnoses in preterm infants. Severe and recurrent apneas are associated with cerebral injury and adverse neurodevelopmental outcome. Despite pharmacotherapy and respiratory support to prevent apneas, a proportion of infants continue to have apnea...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5840648/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29552548 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2018.00045 |
_version_ | 1783304619721490432 |
---|---|
author | Cramer, Sophie J. E. Dekker, Janneke Dankelman, Jenny Pauws, Steffen C. Hooper, Stuart B. te Pas, Arjan B. |
author_facet | Cramer, Sophie J. E. Dekker, Janneke Dankelman, Jenny Pauws, Steffen C. Hooper, Stuart B. te Pas, Arjan B. |
author_sort | Cramer, Sophie J. E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Apnea of prematurity (AOP) is one of the most common diagnoses in preterm infants. Severe and recurrent apneas are associated with cerebral injury and adverse neurodevelopmental outcome. Despite pharmacotherapy and respiratory support to prevent apneas, a proportion of infants continue to have apneas and often need tactile stimulation, mask, and bag ventilation and/or extra oxygen. The duration of the apnea and the concomitant hypoxia and bradycardia depends on the response time of the nurse. We systematically reviewed the literature with the aim of providing an overview of what is known about the effect of manual and mechanical tactile stimulation on AOP. Tactile stimulation, manual or mechanical, has been shown to shorten the duration of apnea, hypoxia, and or bradycardia or even prevent an apnea. Automated stimulation, using closed-loop pulsating or vibrating systems, has been shown to be effective in terminating apneas, but data are scarce. Several studies used continuous mechanical stimulation, with pulsating, vibrating, or oscillating stimuli, to prevent apneas, but the reported effect varied. More studies are needed to confirm whether automated stimulation using a closed loop is more effective than manual stimulation, how and where the automated stimulation should be performed and the potential side effects. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5840648 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58406482018-03-16 Effect of Tactile Stimulation on Termination and Prevention of Apnea of Prematurity: A Systematic Review Cramer, Sophie J. E. Dekker, Janneke Dankelman, Jenny Pauws, Steffen C. Hooper, Stuart B. te Pas, Arjan B. Front Pediatr Pediatrics Apnea of prematurity (AOP) is one of the most common diagnoses in preterm infants. Severe and recurrent apneas are associated with cerebral injury and adverse neurodevelopmental outcome. Despite pharmacotherapy and respiratory support to prevent apneas, a proportion of infants continue to have apneas and often need tactile stimulation, mask, and bag ventilation and/or extra oxygen. The duration of the apnea and the concomitant hypoxia and bradycardia depends on the response time of the nurse. We systematically reviewed the literature with the aim of providing an overview of what is known about the effect of manual and mechanical tactile stimulation on AOP. Tactile stimulation, manual or mechanical, has been shown to shorten the duration of apnea, hypoxia, and or bradycardia or even prevent an apnea. Automated stimulation, using closed-loop pulsating or vibrating systems, has been shown to be effective in terminating apneas, but data are scarce. Several studies used continuous mechanical stimulation, with pulsating, vibrating, or oscillating stimuli, to prevent apneas, but the reported effect varied. More studies are needed to confirm whether automated stimulation using a closed loop is more effective than manual stimulation, how and where the automated stimulation should be performed and the potential side effects. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5840648/ /pubmed/29552548 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2018.00045 Text en Copyright © 2018 Cramer, Dekker, Dankelman, Pauws, Hooper and te Pas. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Pediatrics Cramer, Sophie J. E. Dekker, Janneke Dankelman, Jenny Pauws, Steffen C. Hooper, Stuart B. te Pas, Arjan B. Effect of Tactile Stimulation on Termination and Prevention of Apnea of Prematurity: A Systematic Review |
title | Effect of Tactile Stimulation on Termination and Prevention of Apnea of Prematurity: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Effect of Tactile Stimulation on Termination and Prevention of Apnea of Prematurity: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Effect of Tactile Stimulation on Termination and Prevention of Apnea of Prematurity: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of Tactile Stimulation on Termination and Prevention of Apnea of Prematurity: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Effect of Tactile Stimulation on Termination and Prevention of Apnea of Prematurity: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | effect of tactile stimulation on termination and prevention of apnea of prematurity: a systematic review |
topic | Pediatrics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5840648/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29552548 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2018.00045 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cramersophieje effectoftactilestimulationonterminationandpreventionofapneaofprematurityasystematicreview AT dekkerjanneke effectoftactilestimulationonterminationandpreventionofapneaofprematurityasystematicreview AT dankelmanjenny effectoftactilestimulationonterminationandpreventionofapneaofprematurityasystematicreview AT pauwssteffenc effectoftactilestimulationonterminationandpreventionofapneaofprematurityasystematicreview AT hooperstuartb effectoftactilestimulationonterminationandpreventionofapneaofprematurityasystematicreview AT tepasarjanb effectoftactilestimulationonterminationandpreventionofapneaofprematurityasystematicreview |