Cargando…

Effect of Tactile Stimulation on Termination and Prevention of Apnea of Prematurity: A Systematic Review

Apnea of prematurity (AOP) is one of the most common diagnoses in preterm infants. Severe and recurrent apneas are associated with cerebral injury and adverse neurodevelopmental outcome. Despite pharmacotherapy and respiratory support to prevent apneas, a proportion of infants continue to have apnea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cramer, Sophie J. E., Dekker, Janneke, Dankelman, Jenny, Pauws, Steffen C., Hooper, Stuart B., te Pas, Arjan B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5840648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29552548
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2018.00045
_version_ 1783304619721490432
author Cramer, Sophie J. E.
Dekker, Janneke
Dankelman, Jenny
Pauws, Steffen C.
Hooper, Stuart B.
te Pas, Arjan B.
author_facet Cramer, Sophie J. E.
Dekker, Janneke
Dankelman, Jenny
Pauws, Steffen C.
Hooper, Stuart B.
te Pas, Arjan B.
author_sort Cramer, Sophie J. E.
collection PubMed
description Apnea of prematurity (AOP) is one of the most common diagnoses in preterm infants. Severe and recurrent apneas are associated with cerebral injury and adverse neurodevelopmental outcome. Despite pharmacotherapy and respiratory support to prevent apneas, a proportion of infants continue to have apneas and often need tactile stimulation, mask, and bag ventilation and/or extra oxygen. The duration of the apnea and the concomitant hypoxia and bradycardia depends on the response time of the nurse. We systematically reviewed the literature with the aim of providing an overview of what is known about the effect of manual and mechanical tactile stimulation on AOP. Tactile stimulation, manual or mechanical, has been shown to shorten the duration of apnea, hypoxia, and or bradycardia or even prevent an apnea. Automated stimulation, using closed-loop pulsating or vibrating systems, has been shown to be effective in terminating apneas, but data are scarce. Several studies used continuous mechanical stimulation, with pulsating, vibrating, or oscillating stimuli, to prevent apneas, but the reported effect varied. More studies are needed to confirm whether automated stimulation using a closed loop is more effective than manual stimulation, how and where the automated stimulation should be performed and the potential side effects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5840648
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58406482018-03-16 Effect of Tactile Stimulation on Termination and Prevention of Apnea of Prematurity: A Systematic Review Cramer, Sophie J. E. Dekker, Janneke Dankelman, Jenny Pauws, Steffen C. Hooper, Stuart B. te Pas, Arjan B. Front Pediatr Pediatrics Apnea of prematurity (AOP) is one of the most common diagnoses in preterm infants. Severe and recurrent apneas are associated with cerebral injury and adverse neurodevelopmental outcome. Despite pharmacotherapy and respiratory support to prevent apneas, a proportion of infants continue to have apneas and often need tactile stimulation, mask, and bag ventilation and/or extra oxygen. The duration of the apnea and the concomitant hypoxia and bradycardia depends on the response time of the nurse. We systematically reviewed the literature with the aim of providing an overview of what is known about the effect of manual and mechanical tactile stimulation on AOP. Tactile stimulation, manual or mechanical, has been shown to shorten the duration of apnea, hypoxia, and or bradycardia or even prevent an apnea. Automated stimulation, using closed-loop pulsating or vibrating systems, has been shown to be effective in terminating apneas, but data are scarce. Several studies used continuous mechanical stimulation, with pulsating, vibrating, or oscillating stimuli, to prevent apneas, but the reported effect varied. More studies are needed to confirm whether automated stimulation using a closed loop is more effective than manual stimulation, how and where the automated stimulation should be performed and the potential side effects. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5840648/ /pubmed/29552548 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2018.00045 Text en Copyright © 2018 Cramer, Dekker, Dankelman, Pauws, Hooper and te Pas. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pediatrics
Cramer, Sophie J. E.
Dekker, Janneke
Dankelman, Jenny
Pauws, Steffen C.
Hooper, Stuart B.
te Pas, Arjan B.
Effect of Tactile Stimulation on Termination and Prevention of Apnea of Prematurity: A Systematic Review
title Effect of Tactile Stimulation on Termination and Prevention of Apnea of Prematurity: A Systematic Review
title_full Effect of Tactile Stimulation on Termination and Prevention of Apnea of Prematurity: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Effect of Tactile Stimulation on Termination and Prevention of Apnea of Prematurity: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Tactile Stimulation on Termination and Prevention of Apnea of Prematurity: A Systematic Review
title_short Effect of Tactile Stimulation on Termination and Prevention of Apnea of Prematurity: A Systematic Review
title_sort effect of tactile stimulation on termination and prevention of apnea of prematurity: a systematic review
topic Pediatrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5840648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29552548
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2018.00045
work_keys_str_mv AT cramersophieje effectoftactilestimulationonterminationandpreventionofapneaofprematurityasystematicreview
AT dekkerjanneke effectoftactilestimulationonterminationandpreventionofapneaofprematurityasystematicreview
AT dankelmanjenny effectoftactilestimulationonterminationandpreventionofapneaofprematurityasystematicreview
AT pauwssteffenc effectoftactilestimulationonterminationandpreventionofapneaofprematurityasystematicreview
AT hooperstuartb effectoftactilestimulationonterminationandpreventionofapneaofprematurityasystematicreview
AT tepasarjanb effectoftactilestimulationonterminationandpreventionofapneaofprematurityasystematicreview