Cargando…
Research Integrity and Peer Review—past highlights and future directions
In May 2016, we launched Research Integrity and Peer Review, an international, open access journal with fully open peer review (reviewers are identified on their reports and named reports are published alongside the article) to provide a home for research on research and publication ethics, research...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5840713/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29556422 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41073-018-0047-1 |
_version_ | 1783304628897579008 |
---|---|
author | Boughton, Stephanie L. Kowalczuk, Maria K. Meerpohl, Joerg J. Wager, Elizabeth Moylan, Elizabeth C. |
author_facet | Boughton, Stephanie L. Kowalczuk, Maria K. Meerpohl, Joerg J. Wager, Elizabeth Moylan, Elizabeth C. |
author_sort | Boughton, Stephanie L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In May 2016, we launched Research Integrity and Peer Review, an international, open access journal with fully open peer review (reviewers are identified on their reports and named reports are published alongside the article) to provide a home for research on research and publication ethics, research reporting, and research on peer review. As the journal enters its third year, we reflect on recent events and highlights for the journal and explore how the journal is faring in terms of gender and diversity in peer review. We also share the particular interests of our Editors-in-Chief regarding models of peer review, reporting quality, common research integrity issues that arise during the publishing process, and how people interact with the published literature. We continue to encourage further research into peer review, research and publication ethics and research reporting, as we believe that all new initiatives should be evidence-based. We also remain open to constructive discussions of the developments in the field that offer new solutions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5840713 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58407132018-03-19 Research Integrity and Peer Review—past highlights and future directions Boughton, Stephanie L. Kowalczuk, Maria K. Meerpohl, Joerg J. Wager, Elizabeth Moylan, Elizabeth C. Res Integr Peer Rev Editorial In May 2016, we launched Research Integrity and Peer Review, an international, open access journal with fully open peer review (reviewers are identified on their reports and named reports are published alongside the article) to provide a home for research on research and publication ethics, research reporting, and research on peer review. As the journal enters its third year, we reflect on recent events and highlights for the journal and explore how the journal is faring in terms of gender and diversity in peer review. We also share the particular interests of our Editors-in-Chief regarding models of peer review, reporting quality, common research integrity issues that arise during the publishing process, and how people interact with the published literature. We continue to encourage further research into peer review, research and publication ethics and research reporting, as we believe that all new initiatives should be evidence-based. We also remain open to constructive discussions of the developments in the field that offer new solutions. BioMed Central 2018-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5840713/ /pubmed/29556422 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41073-018-0047-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Editorial Boughton, Stephanie L. Kowalczuk, Maria K. Meerpohl, Joerg J. Wager, Elizabeth Moylan, Elizabeth C. Research Integrity and Peer Review—past highlights and future directions |
title | Research Integrity and Peer Review—past highlights and future directions |
title_full | Research Integrity and Peer Review—past highlights and future directions |
title_fullStr | Research Integrity and Peer Review—past highlights and future directions |
title_full_unstemmed | Research Integrity and Peer Review—past highlights and future directions |
title_short | Research Integrity and Peer Review—past highlights and future directions |
title_sort | research integrity and peer review—past highlights and future directions |
topic | Editorial |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5840713/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29556422 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41073-018-0047-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT boughtonstephaniel researchintegrityandpeerreviewpasthighlightsandfuturedirections AT kowalczukmariak researchintegrityandpeerreviewpasthighlightsandfuturedirections AT meerpohljoergj researchintegrityandpeerreviewpasthighlightsandfuturedirections AT wagerelizabeth researchintegrityandpeerreviewpasthighlightsandfuturedirections AT moylanelizabethc researchintegrityandpeerreviewpasthighlightsandfuturedirections |