Cargando…

Options for sustaining solar-powered mosquito trapping systems on Rusinga Island, Western Kenya: a social dilemma analysis

BACKGROUND: In 2012, a donor-supported proof of principle study was launched to eliminate malaria from Rusinga Island, western Kenya, using solar-powered mosquito trapping systems (SMoTS). SMoTS, which also provided power for room lighting and charging mobile telephones, were installed in houses. In...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oria, Prisca A., Wijnands, Michiel, Alaii, Jane, Leeuwis, Cees
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5840780/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29510683
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5218-y
_version_ 1783304641629388800
author Oria, Prisca A.
Wijnands, Michiel
Alaii, Jane
Leeuwis, Cees
author_facet Oria, Prisca A.
Wijnands, Michiel
Alaii, Jane
Leeuwis, Cees
author_sort Oria, Prisca A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In 2012, a donor-supported proof of principle study was launched to eliminate malaria from Rusinga Island, western Kenya, using solar-powered mosquito trapping systems (SMoTS). SMoTS, which also provided power for room lighting and charging mobile telephones, were installed in houses. In view of the involvement of individual and collective benefits, as well as individual and collective maintenance solutions, this study qualitatively examined preferences of some project stakeholders towards SMoTS sustainability components to see if and how they related to social dilemma factors. METHODS: The data were collected through participant observation, semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions. RESULTS: The results show that respondents largely preferred individual solutions to various aspects of maintenance. Selective collective solutions such as table banking groups were considered positively for mobilising financial resources for maintenance, but respondents were hardly willing to contribute financially to a collective entity. Few people saw a meaningful role for a collective governing body; people preferred to rely on individual household responsibility and private service delivery for repairs and stocking spare parts. An overriding concern was that people lacked trust in other community members, leaders and/or technicians who would be employed by a governing body. Respondents also had little confidence that a governing body or saving group could effectively impose sanctions to misappropriation of funds, poor leadership, defecting group members or technicians that might abuse a salaried position. CONCLUSION: There seemed to be linkages between preferences towards organising various components of SMoTS sustainability and known hindrances to addressing social dilemmas. This posed considerable challenges to organising the sustainability of this innovative malaria control strategy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NTR3496.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5840780
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58407802018-03-14 Options for sustaining solar-powered mosquito trapping systems on Rusinga Island, Western Kenya: a social dilemma analysis Oria, Prisca A. Wijnands, Michiel Alaii, Jane Leeuwis, Cees BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: In 2012, a donor-supported proof of principle study was launched to eliminate malaria from Rusinga Island, western Kenya, using solar-powered mosquito trapping systems (SMoTS). SMoTS, which also provided power for room lighting and charging mobile telephones, were installed in houses. In view of the involvement of individual and collective benefits, as well as individual and collective maintenance solutions, this study qualitatively examined preferences of some project stakeholders towards SMoTS sustainability components to see if and how they related to social dilemma factors. METHODS: The data were collected through participant observation, semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions. RESULTS: The results show that respondents largely preferred individual solutions to various aspects of maintenance. Selective collective solutions such as table banking groups were considered positively for mobilising financial resources for maintenance, but respondents were hardly willing to contribute financially to a collective entity. Few people saw a meaningful role for a collective governing body; people preferred to rely on individual household responsibility and private service delivery for repairs and stocking spare parts. An overriding concern was that people lacked trust in other community members, leaders and/or technicians who would be employed by a governing body. Respondents also had little confidence that a governing body or saving group could effectively impose sanctions to misappropriation of funds, poor leadership, defecting group members or technicians that might abuse a salaried position. CONCLUSION: There seemed to be linkages between preferences towards organising various components of SMoTS sustainability and known hindrances to addressing social dilemmas. This posed considerable challenges to organising the sustainability of this innovative malaria control strategy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NTR3496. BioMed Central 2018-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5840780/ /pubmed/29510683 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5218-y Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Oria, Prisca A.
Wijnands, Michiel
Alaii, Jane
Leeuwis, Cees
Options for sustaining solar-powered mosquito trapping systems on Rusinga Island, Western Kenya: a social dilemma analysis
title Options for sustaining solar-powered mosquito trapping systems on Rusinga Island, Western Kenya: a social dilemma analysis
title_full Options for sustaining solar-powered mosquito trapping systems on Rusinga Island, Western Kenya: a social dilemma analysis
title_fullStr Options for sustaining solar-powered mosquito trapping systems on Rusinga Island, Western Kenya: a social dilemma analysis
title_full_unstemmed Options for sustaining solar-powered mosquito trapping systems on Rusinga Island, Western Kenya: a social dilemma analysis
title_short Options for sustaining solar-powered mosquito trapping systems on Rusinga Island, Western Kenya: a social dilemma analysis
title_sort options for sustaining solar-powered mosquito trapping systems on rusinga island, western kenya: a social dilemma analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5840780/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29510683
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5218-y
work_keys_str_mv AT oriapriscaa optionsforsustainingsolarpoweredmosquitotrappingsystemsonrusingaislandwesternkenyaasocialdilemmaanalysis
AT wijnandsmichiel optionsforsustainingsolarpoweredmosquitotrappingsystemsonrusingaislandwesternkenyaasocialdilemmaanalysis
AT alaiijane optionsforsustainingsolarpoweredmosquitotrappingsystemsonrusingaislandwesternkenyaasocialdilemmaanalysis
AT leeuwiscees optionsforsustainingsolarpoweredmosquitotrappingsystemsonrusingaislandwesternkenyaasocialdilemmaanalysis