Cargando…

A comparison of 10 accelerometer non-wear time criteria and logbooks in children

BACKGROUND: There are many unresolved issues regarding data reduction algorithms for accelerometry. The choice of criterion for removal of non-wear time might have a profound influence on physical activity (PA) and sedentary time (SED) estimates. The aim of the present study was to compare 10 differ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aadland, Eivind, Andersen, Lars Bo, Anderssen, Sigmund Alfred, Resaland, Geir Kåre
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5840816/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29510709
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5212-4
_version_ 1783304648696791040
author Aadland, Eivind
Andersen, Lars Bo
Anderssen, Sigmund Alfred
Resaland, Geir Kåre
author_facet Aadland, Eivind
Andersen, Lars Bo
Anderssen, Sigmund Alfred
Resaland, Geir Kåre
author_sort Aadland, Eivind
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There are many unresolved issues regarding data reduction algorithms for accelerometry. The choice of criterion for removal of non-wear time might have a profound influence on physical activity (PA) and sedentary time (SED) estimates. The aim of the present study was to compare 10 different non-wear criteria and a log of non-wear periods in 11-year-old children. METHODS: Children from the Active Smarter Kids study performed 7-days of hip-worn accelerometer monitoring (Actigraph GT3X+) and logged the number of non-wear periods each day, along with the approximate duration and reason for non-wear. Accelerometers were analyzed using 10 different non-wear criteria: ≥ 10, 20, 30, 45, 60, and 90 min of consecutive zero counts without allowance for interruptions, and ≥60 and 90 min with allowance for 1 and 2 min of interruptions. RESULTS: 891 children provided 5203 measurement days, and reported 1232 non-wear periods ranging from 0 to 3 periods per day: on most days children reported no non-wear periods (77.1% of days). The maximum number of non-wear periods per day was 2 for the 90-min criterion, 3 to 5 for most criteria, 7 for the 20-min criterion, and 20 for the 10-min criterion. The non-wear criteria influenced overall PA (mean values across all criteria: 591 to 649 cpm; 10% difference) and SED time (461 to 539 min/day; 17% difference) estimates, especially for the most prolonged SED bouts. Estimates were similar for time spent in intensity-specific (light, moderate, vigorous, and moderate-to-vigorous) PA, but varied 6–9% among the non-wear criteria for proportions of time spent in intensity-specific PA (% of total wear time). CONCLUSIONS: Population level estimates of PA and SED differed between different accelerometer non-wear criteria, meaning that non-wear time algorithms should be standardized across studies to reduce confusion and improve comparability of children’s PA level. Based on the numbers and reasons for non-wear periods, we suggest a 45 or 60-min consecutive zero count-criterion not allowing any interruptions to be applied in future pediatric studies, at least for children older than 10 years. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study is registered in Clinicaltrials.gov with identification number NCT02132494. Registered 7 April 2014. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-018-5212-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5840816
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58408162018-03-14 A comparison of 10 accelerometer non-wear time criteria and logbooks in children Aadland, Eivind Andersen, Lars Bo Anderssen, Sigmund Alfred Resaland, Geir Kåre BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: There are many unresolved issues regarding data reduction algorithms for accelerometry. The choice of criterion for removal of non-wear time might have a profound influence on physical activity (PA) and sedentary time (SED) estimates. The aim of the present study was to compare 10 different non-wear criteria and a log of non-wear periods in 11-year-old children. METHODS: Children from the Active Smarter Kids study performed 7-days of hip-worn accelerometer monitoring (Actigraph GT3X+) and logged the number of non-wear periods each day, along with the approximate duration and reason for non-wear. Accelerometers were analyzed using 10 different non-wear criteria: ≥ 10, 20, 30, 45, 60, and 90 min of consecutive zero counts without allowance for interruptions, and ≥60 and 90 min with allowance for 1 and 2 min of interruptions. RESULTS: 891 children provided 5203 measurement days, and reported 1232 non-wear periods ranging from 0 to 3 periods per day: on most days children reported no non-wear periods (77.1% of days). The maximum number of non-wear periods per day was 2 for the 90-min criterion, 3 to 5 for most criteria, 7 for the 20-min criterion, and 20 for the 10-min criterion. The non-wear criteria influenced overall PA (mean values across all criteria: 591 to 649 cpm; 10% difference) and SED time (461 to 539 min/day; 17% difference) estimates, especially for the most prolonged SED bouts. Estimates were similar for time spent in intensity-specific (light, moderate, vigorous, and moderate-to-vigorous) PA, but varied 6–9% among the non-wear criteria for proportions of time spent in intensity-specific PA (% of total wear time). CONCLUSIONS: Population level estimates of PA and SED differed between different accelerometer non-wear criteria, meaning that non-wear time algorithms should be standardized across studies to reduce confusion and improve comparability of children’s PA level. Based on the numbers and reasons for non-wear periods, we suggest a 45 or 60-min consecutive zero count-criterion not allowing any interruptions to be applied in future pediatric studies, at least for children older than 10 years. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study is registered in Clinicaltrials.gov with identification number NCT02132494. Registered 7 April 2014. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-018-5212-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5840816/ /pubmed/29510709 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5212-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Aadland, Eivind
Andersen, Lars Bo
Anderssen, Sigmund Alfred
Resaland, Geir Kåre
A comparison of 10 accelerometer non-wear time criteria and logbooks in children
title A comparison of 10 accelerometer non-wear time criteria and logbooks in children
title_full A comparison of 10 accelerometer non-wear time criteria and logbooks in children
title_fullStr A comparison of 10 accelerometer non-wear time criteria and logbooks in children
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of 10 accelerometer non-wear time criteria and logbooks in children
title_short A comparison of 10 accelerometer non-wear time criteria and logbooks in children
title_sort comparison of 10 accelerometer non-wear time criteria and logbooks in children
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5840816/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29510709
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5212-4
work_keys_str_mv AT aadlandeivind acomparisonof10accelerometernonweartimecriteriaandlogbooksinchildren
AT andersenlarsbo acomparisonof10accelerometernonweartimecriteriaandlogbooksinchildren
AT anderssensigmundalfred acomparisonof10accelerometernonweartimecriteriaandlogbooksinchildren
AT resalandgeirkare acomparisonof10accelerometernonweartimecriteriaandlogbooksinchildren
AT aadlandeivind comparisonof10accelerometernonweartimecriteriaandlogbooksinchildren
AT andersenlarsbo comparisonof10accelerometernonweartimecriteriaandlogbooksinchildren
AT anderssensigmundalfred comparisonof10accelerometernonweartimecriteriaandlogbooksinchildren
AT resalandgeirkare comparisonof10accelerometernonweartimecriteriaandlogbooksinchildren