Cargando…

Assessment of trends in cervical cancer screening rates using healthcare claims data: United States, 2003–2014

Improved understanding of the natural history of cervical cancer has led to changes in screening recommendations, including the addition of the human papillomavirus (HPV) testing as an option in routine screening. Most studies of screening trends have used national self-reported survey data. To bett...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Watson, Meg, Benard, Vicki, Flagg, Elaine W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5840841/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29527465
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.01.010
_version_ 1783304654798454784
author Watson, Meg
Benard, Vicki
Flagg, Elaine W.
author_facet Watson, Meg
Benard, Vicki
Flagg, Elaine W.
author_sort Watson, Meg
collection PubMed
description Improved understanding of the natural history of cervical cancer has led to changes in screening recommendations, including the addition of the human papillomavirus (HPV) testing as an option in routine screening. Most studies of screening trends have used national self-reported survey data. To better understand recent trends in cervical cancer screening, including cytology (Papanicolaou, or Pap, tests) and human papillomavirus co-tests (HPV + Pap test), we used healthcare claims data to examine screening practices and trends. We analyzed screening among commercially-insured females ages 18–65 during 2005–2014 who were continuously enrolled during three or more contiguous calendar years, to identify those who received cervical cancer screening with a Pap test or co-test. We examined screening prevalence by age group and year. During the latter years of our study period, screening prevalence (regardless of screening method) declined significantly for women in all age groups examined. Despite declines in overall screening, the prevalence of co-testing increased in all age groups except those aged 18–20. In 2014, women aged 30–39 had the highest overall screening uptake (77.5%) and the highest use of co-testing (44.4%); this group also had the lowest overall declines in screening over the time period (−4.5%). These screening measures from healthcare claims were lower than self-reported screening from national surveys of the general population. More research to explore the reasons for these differences is needed to ensure that women are receiving appropriate screening, and to better understand why screening prevalence is declining among this population of commercially insured women.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5840841
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58408412018-03-09 Assessment of trends in cervical cancer screening rates using healthcare claims data: United States, 2003–2014 Watson, Meg Benard, Vicki Flagg, Elaine W. Prev Med Rep Regular Article Improved understanding of the natural history of cervical cancer has led to changes in screening recommendations, including the addition of the human papillomavirus (HPV) testing as an option in routine screening. Most studies of screening trends have used national self-reported survey data. To better understand recent trends in cervical cancer screening, including cytology (Papanicolaou, or Pap, tests) and human papillomavirus co-tests (HPV + Pap test), we used healthcare claims data to examine screening practices and trends. We analyzed screening among commercially-insured females ages 18–65 during 2005–2014 who were continuously enrolled during three or more contiguous calendar years, to identify those who received cervical cancer screening with a Pap test or co-test. We examined screening prevalence by age group and year. During the latter years of our study period, screening prevalence (regardless of screening method) declined significantly for women in all age groups examined. Despite declines in overall screening, the prevalence of co-testing increased in all age groups except those aged 18–20. In 2014, women aged 30–39 had the highest overall screening uptake (77.5%) and the highest use of co-testing (44.4%); this group also had the lowest overall declines in screening over the time period (−4.5%). These screening measures from healthcare claims were lower than self-reported screening from national surveys of the general population. More research to explore the reasons for these differences is needed to ensure that women are receiving appropriate screening, and to better understand why screening prevalence is declining among this population of commercially insured women. Elsevier 2018-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5840841/ /pubmed/29527465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.01.010 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Regular Article
Watson, Meg
Benard, Vicki
Flagg, Elaine W.
Assessment of trends in cervical cancer screening rates using healthcare claims data: United States, 2003–2014
title Assessment of trends in cervical cancer screening rates using healthcare claims data: United States, 2003–2014
title_full Assessment of trends in cervical cancer screening rates using healthcare claims data: United States, 2003–2014
title_fullStr Assessment of trends in cervical cancer screening rates using healthcare claims data: United States, 2003–2014
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of trends in cervical cancer screening rates using healthcare claims data: United States, 2003–2014
title_short Assessment of trends in cervical cancer screening rates using healthcare claims data: United States, 2003–2014
title_sort assessment of trends in cervical cancer screening rates using healthcare claims data: united states, 2003–2014
topic Regular Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5840841/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29527465
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.01.010
work_keys_str_mv AT watsonmeg assessmentoftrendsincervicalcancerscreeningratesusinghealthcareclaimsdataunitedstates20032014
AT benardvicki assessmentoftrendsincervicalcancerscreeningratesusinghealthcareclaimsdataunitedstates20032014
AT flaggelainew assessmentoftrendsincervicalcancerscreeningratesusinghealthcareclaimsdataunitedstates20032014