Cargando…

Interaction between shock coils increased the incidence of inappropriate therapies and lead failure in implantable cardioverter defibrillator

AIMS: Shock coil interaction in patients with multiple implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) leads is occasionally observed. We aimed to evaluate the incidence of shock coil interaction and its clinical relevance. METHODS AND RESULTS: All ICD patients (646 patients) who came to follow up cont...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: El Garhy, Mohammad, Ohlow, Marc-Alexander, Lauer, Bernward
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5840847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29107755
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ipej.2017.10.003
_version_ 1783304656284286976
author El Garhy, Mohammad
Ohlow, Marc-Alexander
Lauer, Bernward
author_facet El Garhy, Mohammad
Ohlow, Marc-Alexander
Lauer, Bernward
author_sort El Garhy, Mohammad
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Shock coil interaction in patients with multiple implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) leads is occasionally observed. We aimed to evaluate the incidence of shock coil interaction and its clinical relevance. METHODS AND RESULTS: All ICD patients (646 patients) who came to follow up control in our ICD ambulance between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2011 in the department of cardiology in Bad Berka hospital were retrospectively evaluated in this study. All baseline demographic, clinical, and procedural characteristics and postoperative chest x ray in postero-anterior and lateral view as well as clinical and ICD follow up data were evaluated. Among 646 patients 42 had multiple ICD leads (6.5%) of whom 36 patients (5.5% of total cohort patients and 85.7% of patients with multiple ICD leads) had shock coil interaction and presented the study group (Group I). The control group (Group II) consisted of 610 patients without coil-coil interaction including patients with single shock lead (604 patients) or patients with multiple leads but without interaction between shock coils (6 patients). Inappropriate anti-tachycardia therapies and RV lead revisions were more frequent in patients with interaction between shock coils (Group I vs Group II: 27.7% and 5.7%; p = 0.049 and 30.6% vs 6.4; p = 0.0001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Interaction between shock coils may be one of possible causes of lead failure and resulted in inappropriate therapies and subsequent lead revision.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5840847
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58408472018-03-07 Interaction between shock coils increased the incidence of inappropriate therapies and lead failure in implantable cardioverter defibrillator El Garhy, Mohammad Ohlow, Marc-Alexander Lauer, Bernward Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J Original Article AIMS: Shock coil interaction in patients with multiple implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) leads is occasionally observed. We aimed to evaluate the incidence of shock coil interaction and its clinical relevance. METHODS AND RESULTS: All ICD patients (646 patients) who came to follow up control in our ICD ambulance between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2011 in the department of cardiology in Bad Berka hospital were retrospectively evaluated in this study. All baseline demographic, clinical, and procedural characteristics and postoperative chest x ray in postero-anterior and lateral view as well as clinical and ICD follow up data were evaluated. Among 646 patients 42 had multiple ICD leads (6.5%) of whom 36 patients (5.5% of total cohort patients and 85.7% of patients with multiple ICD leads) had shock coil interaction and presented the study group (Group I). The control group (Group II) consisted of 610 patients without coil-coil interaction including patients with single shock lead (604 patients) or patients with multiple leads but without interaction between shock coils (6 patients). Inappropriate anti-tachycardia therapies and RV lead revisions were more frequent in patients with interaction between shock coils (Group I vs Group II: 27.7% and 5.7%; p = 0.049 and 30.6% vs 6.4; p = 0.0001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Interaction between shock coils may be one of possible causes of lead failure and resulted in inappropriate therapies and subsequent lead revision. Elsevier 2017-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5840847/ /pubmed/29107755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ipej.2017.10.003 Text en Copyright © 2018, Indian Heart Rhythm Society. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
El Garhy, Mohammad
Ohlow, Marc-Alexander
Lauer, Bernward
Interaction between shock coils increased the incidence of inappropriate therapies and lead failure in implantable cardioverter defibrillator
title Interaction between shock coils increased the incidence of inappropriate therapies and lead failure in implantable cardioverter defibrillator
title_full Interaction between shock coils increased the incidence of inappropriate therapies and lead failure in implantable cardioverter defibrillator
title_fullStr Interaction between shock coils increased the incidence of inappropriate therapies and lead failure in implantable cardioverter defibrillator
title_full_unstemmed Interaction between shock coils increased the incidence of inappropriate therapies and lead failure in implantable cardioverter defibrillator
title_short Interaction between shock coils increased the incidence of inappropriate therapies and lead failure in implantable cardioverter defibrillator
title_sort interaction between shock coils increased the incidence of inappropriate therapies and lead failure in implantable cardioverter defibrillator
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5840847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29107755
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ipej.2017.10.003
work_keys_str_mv AT elgarhymohammad interactionbetweenshockcoilsincreasedtheincidenceofinappropriatetherapiesandleadfailureinimplantablecardioverterdefibrillator
AT ohlowmarcalexander interactionbetweenshockcoilsincreasedtheincidenceofinappropriatetherapiesandleadfailureinimplantablecardioverterdefibrillator
AT lauerbernward interactionbetweenshockcoilsincreasedtheincidenceofinappropriatetherapiesandleadfailureinimplantablecardioverterdefibrillator