Cargando…

Evaluating the Impact of Various Parameters on the Gamma Index Values of 2D Diode Array in IMRT Verification

BACKGROUND: MapCHECK2 is a two-dimensional diode arrays planar dosimetry verification system. Dosimetric results are evaluated with gamma index. This study aims to provide comprehensive information on the impact of various factors on the gamma index values of MapCHECK2, which is mostly used for IMRT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jabbari, Keyvan, Pashaei, Fakhereh, Ay, Mohammad R., Amouheidari, Alireza, Tavakoli, Mohammad B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5840894/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29535922
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmss.JMSS_15_17
_version_ 1783304661816573952
author Jabbari, Keyvan
Pashaei, Fakhereh
Ay, Mohammad R.
Amouheidari, Alireza
Tavakoli, Mohammad B.
author_facet Jabbari, Keyvan
Pashaei, Fakhereh
Ay, Mohammad R.
Amouheidari, Alireza
Tavakoli, Mohammad B.
author_sort Jabbari, Keyvan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: MapCHECK2 is a two-dimensional diode arrays planar dosimetry verification system. Dosimetric results are evaluated with gamma index. This study aims to provide comprehensive information on the impact of various factors on the gamma index values of MapCHECK2, which is mostly used for IMRT dose verification. METHODS: Seven fields were planned for 6 and 18 MV photons. The azimuthal angle is defined as any rotation of collimators or the MapCHECK2 around the central axis, which was varied from 5 to −5°. The gantry angle was changed from −8 to 8°. Isodose sampling resolution was studied in the range of 0.5 to 4 mm. The effects of additional buildup on gamma index in three cases were also assessed. Gamma test acceptance criteria were 3%/3 mm. RESULTS: The change of azimuthal angle in 5° interval reduced gamma index value by about 9%. The results of putting buildups of various thicknesses on the MapCHECK2 surface showed that gamma index was generally improved in thicker buildup, especially for 18 MV. Changing the sampling resolution from 4 to 2 mm resulted in an increase in gamma index by about 3.7%. The deviation of the gantry in 8° intervals in either directions changed the gamma index only by about 1.6% for 6 MV and 2.1% for 18 MV. CONCLUSION: Among the studied parameters, the azimuthal angle is one of the most effective factors on gamma index value. The gantry angle deviation and sampling resolution are less effective on gamma index value reduction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5840894
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58408942018-03-13 Evaluating the Impact of Various Parameters on the Gamma Index Values of 2D Diode Array in IMRT Verification Jabbari, Keyvan Pashaei, Fakhereh Ay, Mohammad R. Amouheidari, Alireza Tavakoli, Mohammad B. J Med Signals Sens Original Article BACKGROUND: MapCHECK2 is a two-dimensional diode arrays planar dosimetry verification system. Dosimetric results are evaluated with gamma index. This study aims to provide comprehensive information on the impact of various factors on the gamma index values of MapCHECK2, which is mostly used for IMRT dose verification. METHODS: Seven fields were planned for 6 and 18 MV photons. The azimuthal angle is defined as any rotation of collimators or the MapCHECK2 around the central axis, which was varied from 5 to −5°. The gantry angle was changed from −8 to 8°. Isodose sampling resolution was studied in the range of 0.5 to 4 mm. The effects of additional buildup on gamma index in three cases were also assessed. Gamma test acceptance criteria were 3%/3 mm. RESULTS: The change of azimuthal angle in 5° interval reduced gamma index value by about 9%. The results of putting buildups of various thicknesses on the MapCHECK2 surface showed that gamma index was generally improved in thicker buildup, especially for 18 MV. Changing the sampling resolution from 4 to 2 mm resulted in an increase in gamma index by about 3.7%. The deviation of the gantry in 8° intervals in either directions changed the gamma index only by about 1.6% for 6 MV and 2.1% for 18 MV. CONCLUSION: Among the studied parameters, the azimuthal angle is one of the most effective factors on gamma index value. The gantry angle deviation and sampling resolution are less effective on gamma index value reduction. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5840894/ /pubmed/29535922 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmss.JMSS_15_17 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Journal of Medical Signals & Sensors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Jabbari, Keyvan
Pashaei, Fakhereh
Ay, Mohammad R.
Amouheidari, Alireza
Tavakoli, Mohammad B.
Evaluating the Impact of Various Parameters on the Gamma Index Values of 2D Diode Array in IMRT Verification
title Evaluating the Impact of Various Parameters on the Gamma Index Values of 2D Diode Array in IMRT Verification
title_full Evaluating the Impact of Various Parameters on the Gamma Index Values of 2D Diode Array in IMRT Verification
title_fullStr Evaluating the Impact of Various Parameters on the Gamma Index Values of 2D Diode Array in IMRT Verification
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the Impact of Various Parameters on the Gamma Index Values of 2D Diode Array in IMRT Verification
title_short Evaluating the Impact of Various Parameters on the Gamma Index Values of 2D Diode Array in IMRT Verification
title_sort evaluating the impact of various parameters on the gamma index values of 2d diode array in imrt verification
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5840894/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29535922
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmss.JMSS_15_17
work_keys_str_mv AT jabbarikeyvan evaluatingtheimpactofvariousparametersonthegammaindexvaluesof2ddiodearrayinimrtverification
AT pashaeifakhereh evaluatingtheimpactofvariousparametersonthegammaindexvaluesof2ddiodearrayinimrtverification
AT aymohammadr evaluatingtheimpactofvariousparametersonthegammaindexvaluesof2ddiodearrayinimrtverification
AT amouheidarialireza evaluatingtheimpactofvariousparametersonthegammaindexvaluesof2ddiodearrayinimrtverification
AT tavakolimohammadb evaluatingtheimpactofvariousparametersonthegammaindexvaluesof2ddiodearrayinimrtverification