Cargando…
Assessment of Imprecise Small Photon Beam Modeling by Two Treatment Planning System Algorithms
BACKGROUND: Dosimetric accuracy in intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is the main part of quality assurance program. Improper beam modeling of small fields by treatment planning system (TPS) can lead to inaccuracy in treatment delivery. This study aimed to evaluate of the dose delivery acc...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5840895/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29535923 |
_version_ | 1783304662042017792 |
---|---|
author | Keivan, Hadi Shahbazi-Gahrouei, Daryoush Shanei, Ahmad Amouheidari, Alireza |
author_facet | Keivan, Hadi Shahbazi-Gahrouei, Daryoush Shanei, Ahmad Amouheidari, Alireza |
author_sort | Keivan, Hadi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Dosimetric accuracy in intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is the main part of quality assurance program. Improper beam modeling of small fields by treatment planning system (TPS) can lead to inaccuracy in treatment delivery. This study aimed to evaluate of the dose delivery accuracy at small segments of IMRT technique using two-dimensional (2D) array as well as evaluate the capability of two TPSs algorithm in modeling of small fields. METHODS: Irradiation were performed using 6 MV photon beam of Siemens Artiste linear accelerator. Dosimetric behaviors of two dose calculation algorithms, namely, collapsed cone convolution/superposition (CCCS) and full scatter convolution (FSC) in small segments of IMRT plans were analyzed using a 2D diode array and gamma evaluation. RESULTS: Comparisons of measurements against TPSs calculations showed that percentage difference of output factors of small fields were 2% and 15% for CCCS and FSC algorithm, respectively. Gamma analysis of calculated dose distributions by TPSs against those measured by 2D array showed that in passing criteria of 3 mm/3%, the mean pass rate for all segment sizes is higher than 95% except for segment sizes below 3 cm × 3 cm optimized by TiGRT TPS. CONCLUSIONS: High pass rate of gamma index (95%) achieved in planned small segments by Prowess relative to results obtained with TiGRT. This study showed that the accuracy of small field modeling differs between two dose calculation algorithms. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5840895 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58408952018-03-13 Assessment of Imprecise Small Photon Beam Modeling by Two Treatment Planning System Algorithms Keivan, Hadi Shahbazi-Gahrouei, Daryoush Shanei, Ahmad Amouheidari, Alireza J Med Signals Sens Original Article BACKGROUND: Dosimetric accuracy in intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is the main part of quality assurance program. Improper beam modeling of small fields by treatment planning system (TPS) can lead to inaccuracy in treatment delivery. This study aimed to evaluate of the dose delivery accuracy at small segments of IMRT technique using two-dimensional (2D) array as well as evaluate the capability of two TPSs algorithm in modeling of small fields. METHODS: Irradiation were performed using 6 MV photon beam of Siemens Artiste linear accelerator. Dosimetric behaviors of two dose calculation algorithms, namely, collapsed cone convolution/superposition (CCCS) and full scatter convolution (FSC) in small segments of IMRT plans were analyzed using a 2D diode array and gamma evaluation. RESULTS: Comparisons of measurements against TPSs calculations showed that percentage difference of output factors of small fields were 2% and 15% for CCCS and FSC algorithm, respectively. Gamma analysis of calculated dose distributions by TPSs against those measured by 2D array showed that in passing criteria of 3 mm/3%, the mean pass rate for all segment sizes is higher than 95% except for segment sizes below 3 cm × 3 cm optimized by TiGRT TPS. CONCLUSIONS: High pass rate of gamma index (95%) achieved in planned small segments by Prowess relative to results obtained with TiGRT. This study showed that the accuracy of small field modeling differs between two dose calculation algorithms. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5840895/ /pubmed/29535923 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Journal of Medical Signals & Sensors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Keivan, Hadi Shahbazi-Gahrouei, Daryoush Shanei, Ahmad Amouheidari, Alireza Assessment of Imprecise Small Photon Beam Modeling by Two Treatment Planning System Algorithms |
title | Assessment of Imprecise Small Photon Beam Modeling by Two Treatment Planning System Algorithms |
title_full | Assessment of Imprecise Small Photon Beam Modeling by Two Treatment Planning System Algorithms |
title_fullStr | Assessment of Imprecise Small Photon Beam Modeling by Two Treatment Planning System Algorithms |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of Imprecise Small Photon Beam Modeling by Two Treatment Planning System Algorithms |
title_short | Assessment of Imprecise Small Photon Beam Modeling by Two Treatment Planning System Algorithms |
title_sort | assessment of imprecise small photon beam modeling by two treatment planning system algorithms |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5840895/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29535923 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT keivanhadi assessmentofimprecisesmallphotonbeammodelingbytwotreatmentplanningsystemalgorithms AT shahbazigahroueidaryoush assessmentofimprecisesmallphotonbeammodelingbytwotreatmentplanningsystemalgorithms AT shaneiahmad assessmentofimprecisesmallphotonbeammodelingbytwotreatmentplanningsystemalgorithms AT amouheidarialireza assessmentofimprecisesmallphotonbeammodelingbytwotreatmentplanningsystemalgorithms |