Cargando…
‘Take Ten’ improving the surgical post-take ward round: a quality improvement project
BACKGROUND: The surgical post-take ward round is a complex multidisciplinary interaction in which new surgical patients are reviewed and management plans formulated. Its fast-paced nature can lead to poor communication and inaccurate or incomplete documentation with potential detriment to patient sa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5841505/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29527575 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000045 |
_version_ | 1783304763119501312 |
---|---|
author | Banfield, Danielle Alice Adamson, Carly Tomsett, Amy Povey, James Fordham, Tony Richards, Sarah Kathryn |
author_facet | Banfield, Danielle Alice Adamson, Carly Tomsett, Amy Povey, James Fordham, Tony Richards, Sarah Kathryn |
author_sort | Banfield, Danielle Alice |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The surgical post-take ward round is a complex multidisciplinary interaction in which new surgical patients are reviewed and management plans formulated. Its fast-paced nature can lead to poor communication and inaccurate or incomplete documentation with potential detriment to patient safety. Junior team members often do not fully understand the diagnosis and management plan. AIMS: The aims of this project were to improve both communication and documentation on the surgical post-take ward round, influencing patient safety. METHODS: The ward round was deconstructed to identify individual roles and determine where intervention would have the most impact. Ten important points were identified that should be documented in the management of an acute surgical patient; observations, examination, impression, investigations, antibiotics, intravenous fluids, VTE assessment, nutrition status, estimated length of stay and ceiling of treatment. A ‘Take Ten’ checklist was devised with these items to be used as a ‘time out’ after each patient with the whole team for discussion, clarification and clear documentation. Four plan do study act cycles were completed over a period of a year. A retrospective review of post-take documentation preintervention and postintervention was performed, and the percentage of points that were accurately documented was calculated. For further clarification, 2 weekends were compared—one where the checklist was used and one where it was not. RESULTS: Results showed documentation postintervention varied between categories but there was improvement in documentation of VTE assessment, fluids, observations and investigations. On direct comparison of weekends the checklist showed improved documentation in all categories except length of stay. Junior team members found the checklist improved understanding of diagnosis and management plan, and encouraged a more effective ward round. CONCLUSION: The ‘Take Ten’ checklist has been well received. Three years on from its inception, the checklist has become an integral part of the post-take ward round, thanks to the multidisciplinary engagement in the project. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5841505 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58415052018-03-09 ‘Take Ten’ improving the surgical post-take ward round: a quality improvement project Banfield, Danielle Alice Adamson, Carly Tomsett, Amy Povey, James Fordham, Tony Richards, Sarah Kathryn BMJ Open Qual BMJ Quality Improvement Report BACKGROUND: The surgical post-take ward round is a complex multidisciplinary interaction in which new surgical patients are reviewed and management plans formulated. Its fast-paced nature can lead to poor communication and inaccurate or incomplete documentation with potential detriment to patient safety. Junior team members often do not fully understand the diagnosis and management plan. AIMS: The aims of this project were to improve both communication and documentation on the surgical post-take ward round, influencing patient safety. METHODS: The ward round was deconstructed to identify individual roles and determine where intervention would have the most impact. Ten important points were identified that should be documented in the management of an acute surgical patient; observations, examination, impression, investigations, antibiotics, intravenous fluids, VTE assessment, nutrition status, estimated length of stay and ceiling of treatment. A ‘Take Ten’ checklist was devised with these items to be used as a ‘time out’ after each patient with the whole team for discussion, clarification and clear documentation. Four plan do study act cycles were completed over a period of a year. A retrospective review of post-take documentation preintervention and postintervention was performed, and the percentage of points that were accurately documented was calculated. For further clarification, 2 weekends were compared—one where the checklist was used and one where it was not. RESULTS: Results showed documentation postintervention varied between categories but there was improvement in documentation of VTE assessment, fluids, observations and investigations. On direct comparison of weekends the checklist showed improved documentation in all categories except length of stay. Junior team members found the checklist improved understanding of diagnosis and management plan, and encouraged a more effective ward round. CONCLUSION: The ‘Take Ten’ checklist has been well received. Three years on from its inception, the checklist has become an integral part of the post-take ward round, thanks to the multidisciplinary engagement in the project. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5841505/ /pubmed/29527575 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000045 Text en © Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | BMJ Quality Improvement Report Banfield, Danielle Alice Adamson, Carly Tomsett, Amy Povey, James Fordham, Tony Richards, Sarah Kathryn ‘Take Ten’ improving the surgical post-take ward round: a quality improvement project |
title | ‘Take Ten’ improving the surgical post-take ward round: a quality improvement project |
title_full | ‘Take Ten’ improving the surgical post-take ward round: a quality improvement project |
title_fullStr | ‘Take Ten’ improving the surgical post-take ward round: a quality improvement project |
title_full_unstemmed | ‘Take Ten’ improving the surgical post-take ward round: a quality improvement project |
title_short | ‘Take Ten’ improving the surgical post-take ward round: a quality improvement project |
title_sort | ‘take ten’ improving the surgical post-take ward round: a quality improvement project |
topic | BMJ Quality Improvement Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5841505/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29527575 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000045 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT banfielddaniellealice taketenimprovingthesurgicalposttakewardroundaqualityimprovementproject AT adamsoncarly taketenimprovingthesurgicalposttakewardroundaqualityimprovementproject AT tomsettamy taketenimprovingthesurgicalposttakewardroundaqualityimprovementproject AT poveyjames taketenimprovingthesurgicalposttakewardroundaqualityimprovementproject AT fordhamtony taketenimprovingthesurgicalposttakewardroundaqualityimprovementproject AT richardssarahkathryn taketenimprovingthesurgicalposttakewardroundaqualityimprovementproject |