Cargando…

Evaluation of research on interventions aligned to WHO ‘Best Buys’ for NCDs in low-income and lower-middle-income countries: a systematic review from 1990 to 2015

BACKGROUND: Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) are the leading cause of death and disability worldwide, with low-income and middle-income countries experiencing a disproportionately high burden. Since 2010 WHO has promoted 24 highly cost-effective interventions for NCDs, dubbed ‘best buys’. It is uncl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Allen, Luke N, Pullar, Jessica, Wickramasinghe, Kremlin Khamarj, Williams, Julianne, Roberts, Nia, Mikkelsen, Bente, Varghese, Cherian, Townsend, Nick
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5841523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29527342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000535
_version_ 1783304767526666240
author Allen, Luke N
Pullar, Jessica
Wickramasinghe, Kremlin Khamarj
Williams, Julianne
Roberts, Nia
Mikkelsen, Bente
Varghese, Cherian
Townsend, Nick
author_facet Allen, Luke N
Pullar, Jessica
Wickramasinghe, Kremlin Khamarj
Williams, Julianne
Roberts, Nia
Mikkelsen, Bente
Varghese, Cherian
Townsend, Nick
author_sort Allen, Luke N
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) are the leading cause of death and disability worldwide, with low-income and middle-income countries experiencing a disproportionately high burden. Since 2010 WHO has promoted 24 highly cost-effective interventions for NCDs, dubbed ‘best buys’. It is unclear whether these interventions have been evaluated in low-income and lower-middle-income countries (LLMICs). AIM: To systematically review research on interventions aligned to WHO ‘best buys’ for NCDs in LLMICs. METHODS: We searched 13 major databases and included papers conducted in the 83 World Bank-defined LLMICs, published between 1 January 1990 and 5 February 2015. Two reviewers independently screened papers and assessed risk of bias. We adopted a narrative approach to data synthesis. The primary outcomes were NCD-related mortality and morbidity, and risk factor prevalence. RESULTS: We identified 2672 records, of which 36 were included (608 940 participants). No studies on ‘best buys’ were found in 89% of LLMICs. Nineteen of the 36 studies reported on the effectiveness of tobacco-related ‘best buys’, presenting good evidence for group interventions in reducing tobacco use but weaker evidence for interventions targeting individuals. There were fewer studies on smoking bans, warning labels and mass media campaigns, and no studies on taxes or marketing restrictions. There was supportive evidence that cervical screening and hepatitis B immunisation prevent cancer in LLMICs. A single randomised controlled trial supported polypharmacy for cardiovascular disease. Fourteen of the ‘best buy’ interventions did not have any good evidence for effectiveness in LLMICs. CONCLUSIONS: We found studies on only 11 of the 24 interventions aligned with the WHO ‘best buys’ from LLMIC settings. Most LLMICs have not conducted research on these interventions in their populations. LLMICs should take action to implement and evaluate ‘best buys’ in their national context, based on national priorities, and starting with interventions with the strongest evidence base.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5841523
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58415232018-03-09 Evaluation of research on interventions aligned to WHO ‘Best Buys’ for NCDs in low-income and lower-middle-income countries: a systematic review from 1990 to 2015 Allen, Luke N Pullar, Jessica Wickramasinghe, Kremlin Khamarj Williams, Julianne Roberts, Nia Mikkelsen, Bente Varghese, Cherian Townsend, Nick BMJ Glob Health Research BACKGROUND: Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) are the leading cause of death and disability worldwide, with low-income and middle-income countries experiencing a disproportionately high burden. Since 2010 WHO has promoted 24 highly cost-effective interventions for NCDs, dubbed ‘best buys’. It is unclear whether these interventions have been evaluated in low-income and lower-middle-income countries (LLMICs). AIM: To systematically review research on interventions aligned to WHO ‘best buys’ for NCDs in LLMICs. METHODS: We searched 13 major databases and included papers conducted in the 83 World Bank-defined LLMICs, published between 1 January 1990 and 5 February 2015. Two reviewers independently screened papers and assessed risk of bias. We adopted a narrative approach to data synthesis. The primary outcomes were NCD-related mortality and morbidity, and risk factor prevalence. RESULTS: We identified 2672 records, of which 36 were included (608 940 participants). No studies on ‘best buys’ were found in 89% of LLMICs. Nineteen of the 36 studies reported on the effectiveness of tobacco-related ‘best buys’, presenting good evidence for group interventions in reducing tobacco use but weaker evidence for interventions targeting individuals. There were fewer studies on smoking bans, warning labels and mass media campaigns, and no studies on taxes or marketing restrictions. There was supportive evidence that cervical screening and hepatitis B immunisation prevent cancer in LLMICs. A single randomised controlled trial supported polypharmacy for cardiovascular disease. Fourteen of the ‘best buy’ interventions did not have any good evidence for effectiveness in LLMICs. CONCLUSIONS: We found studies on only 11 of the 24 interventions aligned with the WHO ‘best buys’ from LLMIC settings. Most LLMICs have not conducted research on these interventions in their populations. LLMICs should take action to implement and evaluate ‘best buys’ in their national context, based on national priorities, and starting with interventions with the strongest evidence base. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5841523/ /pubmed/29527342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000535 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Research
Allen, Luke N
Pullar, Jessica
Wickramasinghe, Kremlin Khamarj
Williams, Julianne
Roberts, Nia
Mikkelsen, Bente
Varghese, Cherian
Townsend, Nick
Evaluation of research on interventions aligned to WHO ‘Best Buys’ for NCDs in low-income and lower-middle-income countries: a systematic review from 1990 to 2015
title Evaluation of research on interventions aligned to WHO ‘Best Buys’ for NCDs in low-income and lower-middle-income countries: a systematic review from 1990 to 2015
title_full Evaluation of research on interventions aligned to WHO ‘Best Buys’ for NCDs in low-income and lower-middle-income countries: a systematic review from 1990 to 2015
title_fullStr Evaluation of research on interventions aligned to WHO ‘Best Buys’ for NCDs in low-income and lower-middle-income countries: a systematic review from 1990 to 2015
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of research on interventions aligned to WHO ‘Best Buys’ for NCDs in low-income and lower-middle-income countries: a systematic review from 1990 to 2015
title_short Evaluation of research on interventions aligned to WHO ‘Best Buys’ for NCDs in low-income and lower-middle-income countries: a systematic review from 1990 to 2015
title_sort evaluation of research on interventions aligned to who ‘best buys’ for ncds in low-income and lower-middle-income countries: a systematic review from 1990 to 2015
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5841523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29527342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000535
work_keys_str_mv AT allenluken evaluationofresearchoninterventionsalignedtowhobestbuysforncdsinlowincomeandlowermiddleincomecountriesasystematicreviewfrom1990to2015
AT pullarjessica evaluationofresearchoninterventionsalignedtowhobestbuysforncdsinlowincomeandlowermiddleincomecountriesasystematicreviewfrom1990to2015
AT wickramasinghekremlinkhamarj evaluationofresearchoninterventionsalignedtowhobestbuysforncdsinlowincomeandlowermiddleincomecountriesasystematicreviewfrom1990to2015
AT williamsjulianne evaluationofresearchoninterventionsalignedtowhobestbuysforncdsinlowincomeandlowermiddleincomecountriesasystematicreviewfrom1990to2015
AT robertsnia evaluationofresearchoninterventionsalignedtowhobestbuysforncdsinlowincomeandlowermiddleincomecountriesasystematicreviewfrom1990to2015
AT mikkelsenbente evaluationofresearchoninterventionsalignedtowhobestbuysforncdsinlowincomeandlowermiddleincomecountriesasystematicreviewfrom1990to2015
AT varghesecherian evaluationofresearchoninterventionsalignedtowhobestbuysforncdsinlowincomeandlowermiddleincomecountriesasystematicreviewfrom1990to2015
AT townsendnick evaluationofresearchoninterventionsalignedtowhobestbuysforncdsinlowincomeandlowermiddleincomecountriesasystematicreviewfrom1990to2015