Cargando…
A randomised controlled trial of gemcitabine hydrochloride plus S-1 combination therapy versus gemcitabine hydrochloride therapy alone in pancreatic cancer patients aged ≥75 years: a study protocol for an open-label randomised feasibility study
INTRODUCTION: In Japan, the age of patients with pancreatic cancer has increased. Combination chemotherapies such as 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin, oxaliplatin and irinotecan therapy and gemcitabine hydrochloride (GEM) +nab paclitaxel therapy have been developed as the standard treatments for young pati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5841525/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29527313 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2017-000187 |
_version_ | 1783304768019496960 |
---|---|
author | Ishii, Hiroshi Yamashita, Natsumi Ueno, Makoto Ohkawa, Shinichi Saito, Akiko M Sekimoto, Mitsugu |
author_facet | Ishii, Hiroshi Yamashita, Natsumi Ueno, Makoto Ohkawa, Shinichi Saito, Akiko M Sekimoto, Mitsugu |
author_sort | Ishii, Hiroshi |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: In Japan, the age of patients with pancreatic cancer has increased. Combination chemotherapies such as 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin, oxaliplatin and irinotecan therapy and gemcitabine hydrochloride (GEM) +nab paclitaxel therapy have been developed as the standard treatments for young patients with advanced recurrent pancreatic cancer. However, both therapies produce toxicity and their administration is limited by the patients’ age or performance status. The efficacy and safety data obtained in the GEST study—a large-scale randomised controlled study conducted in patients with pancreatic cancer in Japan—suggested that GEM +S-1 (GS) combination therapy is a promising candidate for those aged between 75 and 80 years. However, for patients aged ≥80 years, no efficacy or safety data on GS therapy are currently available. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This open-label, randomised phase II study will involve patients with advanced recurrent pancreatic cancer, aged ≥75 years, with favourable general conditions. Using the electronic data capture system, participants will be randomly allocated to groups with standard treatment (GEM therapy alone) and study treatment (GS therapy). The treatments will be administered until the conditions meet the discontinuation criteria. The primary endpoint is overall survival. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This trial has been approved by the National Hospital Organisation’s Central Review Board (H28-NHOD-01). DISCUSSION: This study will reveal if GS therapy could be a standard treatment option for elderly patients with pancreatic cancer, by clarifying its efficacy and safety. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000025747; Pre-results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5841525 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58415252018-03-09 A randomised controlled trial of gemcitabine hydrochloride plus S-1 combination therapy versus gemcitabine hydrochloride therapy alone in pancreatic cancer patients aged ≥75 years: a study protocol for an open-label randomised feasibility study Ishii, Hiroshi Yamashita, Natsumi Ueno, Makoto Ohkawa, Shinichi Saito, Akiko M Sekimoto, Mitsugu BMJ Open Gastroenterol Pancreatic Cancer INTRODUCTION: In Japan, the age of patients with pancreatic cancer has increased. Combination chemotherapies such as 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin, oxaliplatin and irinotecan therapy and gemcitabine hydrochloride (GEM) +nab paclitaxel therapy have been developed as the standard treatments for young patients with advanced recurrent pancreatic cancer. However, both therapies produce toxicity and their administration is limited by the patients’ age or performance status. The efficacy and safety data obtained in the GEST study—a large-scale randomised controlled study conducted in patients with pancreatic cancer in Japan—suggested that GEM +S-1 (GS) combination therapy is a promising candidate for those aged between 75 and 80 years. However, for patients aged ≥80 years, no efficacy or safety data on GS therapy are currently available. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This open-label, randomised phase II study will involve patients with advanced recurrent pancreatic cancer, aged ≥75 years, with favourable general conditions. Using the electronic data capture system, participants will be randomly allocated to groups with standard treatment (GEM therapy alone) and study treatment (GS therapy). The treatments will be administered until the conditions meet the discontinuation criteria. The primary endpoint is overall survival. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This trial has been approved by the National Hospital Organisation’s Central Review Board (H28-NHOD-01). DISCUSSION: This study will reveal if GS therapy could be a standard treatment option for elderly patients with pancreatic cancer, by clarifying its efficacy and safety. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000025747; Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5841525/ /pubmed/29527313 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2017-000187 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Pancreatic Cancer Ishii, Hiroshi Yamashita, Natsumi Ueno, Makoto Ohkawa, Shinichi Saito, Akiko M Sekimoto, Mitsugu A randomised controlled trial of gemcitabine hydrochloride plus S-1 combination therapy versus gemcitabine hydrochloride therapy alone in pancreatic cancer patients aged ≥75 years: a study protocol for an open-label randomised feasibility study |
title | A randomised controlled trial of gemcitabine hydrochloride plus S-1 combination therapy versus gemcitabine hydrochloride therapy alone in pancreatic cancer patients aged ≥75 years: a study protocol for an open-label randomised feasibility study |
title_full | A randomised controlled trial of gemcitabine hydrochloride plus S-1 combination therapy versus gemcitabine hydrochloride therapy alone in pancreatic cancer patients aged ≥75 years: a study protocol for an open-label randomised feasibility study |
title_fullStr | A randomised controlled trial of gemcitabine hydrochloride plus S-1 combination therapy versus gemcitabine hydrochloride therapy alone in pancreatic cancer patients aged ≥75 years: a study protocol for an open-label randomised feasibility study |
title_full_unstemmed | A randomised controlled trial of gemcitabine hydrochloride plus S-1 combination therapy versus gemcitabine hydrochloride therapy alone in pancreatic cancer patients aged ≥75 years: a study protocol for an open-label randomised feasibility study |
title_short | A randomised controlled trial of gemcitabine hydrochloride plus S-1 combination therapy versus gemcitabine hydrochloride therapy alone in pancreatic cancer patients aged ≥75 years: a study protocol for an open-label randomised feasibility study |
title_sort | randomised controlled trial of gemcitabine hydrochloride plus s-1 combination therapy versus gemcitabine hydrochloride therapy alone in pancreatic cancer patients aged ≥75 years: a study protocol for an open-label randomised feasibility study |
topic | Pancreatic Cancer |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5841525/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29527313 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2017-000187 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ishiihiroshi arandomisedcontrolledtrialofgemcitabinehydrochloridepluss1combinationtherapyversusgemcitabinehydrochloridetherapyaloneinpancreaticcancerpatientsaged75yearsastudyprotocolforanopenlabelrandomisedfeasibilitystudy AT yamashitanatsumi arandomisedcontrolledtrialofgemcitabinehydrochloridepluss1combinationtherapyversusgemcitabinehydrochloridetherapyaloneinpancreaticcancerpatientsaged75yearsastudyprotocolforanopenlabelrandomisedfeasibilitystudy AT uenomakoto arandomisedcontrolledtrialofgemcitabinehydrochloridepluss1combinationtherapyversusgemcitabinehydrochloridetherapyaloneinpancreaticcancerpatientsaged75yearsastudyprotocolforanopenlabelrandomisedfeasibilitystudy AT ohkawashinichi arandomisedcontrolledtrialofgemcitabinehydrochloridepluss1combinationtherapyversusgemcitabinehydrochloridetherapyaloneinpancreaticcancerpatientsaged75yearsastudyprotocolforanopenlabelrandomisedfeasibilitystudy AT saitoakikom arandomisedcontrolledtrialofgemcitabinehydrochloridepluss1combinationtherapyversusgemcitabinehydrochloridetherapyaloneinpancreaticcancerpatientsaged75yearsastudyprotocolforanopenlabelrandomisedfeasibilitystudy AT sekimotomitsugu arandomisedcontrolledtrialofgemcitabinehydrochloridepluss1combinationtherapyversusgemcitabinehydrochloridetherapyaloneinpancreaticcancerpatientsaged75yearsastudyprotocolforanopenlabelrandomisedfeasibilitystudy AT ishiihiroshi randomisedcontrolledtrialofgemcitabinehydrochloridepluss1combinationtherapyversusgemcitabinehydrochloridetherapyaloneinpancreaticcancerpatientsaged75yearsastudyprotocolforanopenlabelrandomisedfeasibilitystudy AT yamashitanatsumi randomisedcontrolledtrialofgemcitabinehydrochloridepluss1combinationtherapyversusgemcitabinehydrochloridetherapyaloneinpancreaticcancerpatientsaged75yearsastudyprotocolforanopenlabelrandomisedfeasibilitystudy AT uenomakoto randomisedcontrolledtrialofgemcitabinehydrochloridepluss1combinationtherapyversusgemcitabinehydrochloridetherapyaloneinpancreaticcancerpatientsaged75yearsastudyprotocolforanopenlabelrandomisedfeasibilitystudy AT ohkawashinichi randomisedcontrolledtrialofgemcitabinehydrochloridepluss1combinationtherapyversusgemcitabinehydrochloridetherapyaloneinpancreaticcancerpatientsaged75yearsastudyprotocolforanopenlabelrandomisedfeasibilitystudy AT saitoakikom randomisedcontrolledtrialofgemcitabinehydrochloridepluss1combinationtherapyversusgemcitabinehydrochloridetherapyaloneinpancreaticcancerpatientsaged75yearsastudyprotocolforanopenlabelrandomisedfeasibilitystudy AT sekimotomitsugu randomisedcontrolledtrialofgemcitabinehydrochloridepluss1combinationtherapyversusgemcitabinehydrochloridetherapyaloneinpancreaticcancerpatientsaged75yearsastudyprotocolforanopenlabelrandomisedfeasibilitystudy |