Cargando…

A randomised controlled trial of gemcitabine hydrochloride plus S-1 combination therapy versus gemcitabine hydrochloride therapy alone in pancreatic cancer patients aged ≥75 years: a study protocol for an open-label randomised feasibility study

INTRODUCTION: In Japan, the age of patients with pancreatic cancer has increased. Combination chemotherapies such as 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin, oxaliplatin and irinotecan therapy and gemcitabine hydrochloride (GEM) +nab paclitaxel therapy have been developed as the standard treatments for young pati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ishii, Hiroshi, Yamashita, Natsumi, Ueno, Makoto, Ohkawa, Shinichi, Saito, Akiko M, Sekimoto, Mitsugu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5841525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29527313
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2017-000187
_version_ 1783304768019496960
author Ishii, Hiroshi
Yamashita, Natsumi
Ueno, Makoto
Ohkawa, Shinichi
Saito, Akiko M
Sekimoto, Mitsugu
author_facet Ishii, Hiroshi
Yamashita, Natsumi
Ueno, Makoto
Ohkawa, Shinichi
Saito, Akiko M
Sekimoto, Mitsugu
author_sort Ishii, Hiroshi
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: In Japan, the age of patients with pancreatic cancer has increased. Combination chemotherapies such as 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin, oxaliplatin and irinotecan therapy and gemcitabine hydrochloride (GEM) +nab paclitaxel therapy have been developed as the standard treatments for young patients with advanced recurrent pancreatic cancer. However, both therapies produce toxicity and their administration is limited by the patients’ age or performance status. The efficacy and safety data obtained in the GEST study—a large-scale randomised controlled study conducted in patients with pancreatic cancer in Japan—suggested that GEM +S-1 (GS) combination therapy is a promising candidate for those aged between 75 and 80 years. However, for patients aged ≥80 years, no efficacy or safety data on GS therapy are currently available. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This open-label, randomised phase II study will involve patients with advanced recurrent pancreatic cancer, aged ≥75 years, with favourable general conditions. Using the electronic data capture system, participants will be randomly allocated to groups with standard treatment (GEM therapy alone) and study treatment (GS therapy). The treatments will be administered until the conditions meet the discontinuation criteria. The primary endpoint is overall survival. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This trial has been approved by the National Hospital Organisation’s Central Review Board (H28-NHOD-01). DISCUSSION: This study will reveal if GS therapy could be a standard treatment option for elderly patients with pancreatic cancer, by clarifying its efficacy and safety. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000025747; Pre-results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5841525
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58415252018-03-09 A randomised controlled trial of gemcitabine hydrochloride plus S-1 combination therapy versus gemcitabine hydrochloride therapy alone in pancreatic cancer patients aged ≥75 years: a study protocol for an open-label randomised feasibility study Ishii, Hiroshi Yamashita, Natsumi Ueno, Makoto Ohkawa, Shinichi Saito, Akiko M Sekimoto, Mitsugu BMJ Open Gastroenterol Pancreatic Cancer INTRODUCTION: In Japan, the age of patients with pancreatic cancer has increased. Combination chemotherapies such as 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin, oxaliplatin and irinotecan therapy and gemcitabine hydrochloride (GEM) +nab paclitaxel therapy have been developed as the standard treatments for young patients with advanced recurrent pancreatic cancer. However, both therapies produce toxicity and their administration is limited by the patients’ age or performance status. The efficacy and safety data obtained in the GEST study—a large-scale randomised controlled study conducted in patients with pancreatic cancer in Japan—suggested that GEM +S-1 (GS) combination therapy is a promising candidate for those aged between 75 and 80 years. However, for patients aged ≥80 years, no efficacy or safety data on GS therapy are currently available. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This open-label, randomised phase II study will involve patients with advanced recurrent pancreatic cancer, aged ≥75 years, with favourable general conditions. Using the electronic data capture system, participants will be randomly allocated to groups with standard treatment (GEM therapy alone) and study treatment (GS therapy). The treatments will be administered until the conditions meet the discontinuation criteria. The primary endpoint is overall survival. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This trial has been approved by the National Hospital Organisation’s Central Review Board (H28-NHOD-01). DISCUSSION: This study will reveal if GS therapy could be a standard treatment option for elderly patients with pancreatic cancer, by clarifying its efficacy and safety. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000025747; Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5841525/ /pubmed/29527313 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2017-000187 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Pancreatic Cancer
Ishii, Hiroshi
Yamashita, Natsumi
Ueno, Makoto
Ohkawa, Shinichi
Saito, Akiko M
Sekimoto, Mitsugu
A randomised controlled trial of gemcitabine hydrochloride plus S-1 combination therapy versus gemcitabine hydrochloride therapy alone in pancreatic cancer patients aged ≥75 years: a study protocol for an open-label randomised feasibility study
title A randomised controlled trial of gemcitabine hydrochloride plus S-1 combination therapy versus gemcitabine hydrochloride therapy alone in pancreatic cancer patients aged ≥75 years: a study protocol for an open-label randomised feasibility study
title_full A randomised controlled trial of gemcitabine hydrochloride plus S-1 combination therapy versus gemcitabine hydrochloride therapy alone in pancreatic cancer patients aged ≥75 years: a study protocol for an open-label randomised feasibility study
title_fullStr A randomised controlled trial of gemcitabine hydrochloride plus S-1 combination therapy versus gemcitabine hydrochloride therapy alone in pancreatic cancer patients aged ≥75 years: a study protocol for an open-label randomised feasibility study
title_full_unstemmed A randomised controlled trial of gemcitabine hydrochloride plus S-1 combination therapy versus gemcitabine hydrochloride therapy alone in pancreatic cancer patients aged ≥75 years: a study protocol for an open-label randomised feasibility study
title_short A randomised controlled trial of gemcitabine hydrochloride plus S-1 combination therapy versus gemcitabine hydrochloride therapy alone in pancreatic cancer patients aged ≥75 years: a study protocol for an open-label randomised feasibility study
title_sort randomised controlled trial of gemcitabine hydrochloride plus s-1 combination therapy versus gemcitabine hydrochloride therapy alone in pancreatic cancer patients aged ≥75 years: a study protocol for an open-label randomised feasibility study
topic Pancreatic Cancer
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5841525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29527313
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2017-000187
work_keys_str_mv AT ishiihiroshi arandomisedcontrolledtrialofgemcitabinehydrochloridepluss1combinationtherapyversusgemcitabinehydrochloridetherapyaloneinpancreaticcancerpatientsaged75yearsastudyprotocolforanopenlabelrandomisedfeasibilitystudy
AT yamashitanatsumi arandomisedcontrolledtrialofgemcitabinehydrochloridepluss1combinationtherapyversusgemcitabinehydrochloridetherapyaloneinpancreaticcancerpatientsaged75yearsastudyprotocolforanopenlabelrandomisedfeasibilitystudy
AT uenomakoto arandomisedcontrolledtrialofgemcitabinehydrochloridepluss1combinationtherapyversusgemcitabinehydrochloridetherapyaloneinpancreaticcancerpatientsaged75yearsastudyprotocolforanopenlabelrandomisedfeasibilitystudy
AT ohkawashinichi arandomisedcontrolledtrialofgemcitabinehydrochloridepluss1combinationtherapyversusgemcitabinehydrochloridetherapyaloneinpancreaticcancerpatientsaged75yearsastudyprotocolforanopenlabelrandomisedfeasibilitystudy
AT saitoakikom arandomisedcontrolledtrialofgemcitabinehydrochloridepluss1combinationtherapyversusgemcitabinehydrochloridetherapyaloneinpancreaticcancerpatientsaged75yearsastudyprotocolforanopenlabelrandomisedfeasibilitystudy
AT sekimotomitsugu arandomisedcontrolledtrialofgemcitabinehydrochloridepluss1combinationtherapyversusgemcitabinehydrochloridetherapyaloneinpancreaticcancerpatientsaged75yearsastudyprotocolforanopenlabelrandomisedfeasibilitystudy
AT ishiihiroshi randomisedcontrolledtrialofgemcitabinehydrochloridepluss1combinationtherapyversusgemcitabinehydrochloridetherapyaloneinpancreaticcancerpatientsaged75yearsastudyprotocolforanopenlabelrandomisedfeasibilitystudy
AT yamashitanatsumi randomisedcontrolledtrialofgemcitabinehydrochloridepluss1combinationtherapyversusgemcitabinehydrochloridetherapyaloneinpancreaticcancerpatientsaged75yearsastudyprotocolforanopenlabelrandomisedfeasibilitystudy
AT uenomakoto randomisedcontrolledtrialofgemcitabinehydrochloridepluss1combinationtherapyversusgemcitabinehydrochloridetherapyaloneinpancreaticcancerpatientsaged75yearsastudyprotocolforanopenlabelrandomisedfeasibilitystudy
AT ohkawashinichi randomisedcontrolledtrialofgemcitabinehydrochloridepluss1combinationtherapyversusgemcitabinehydrochloridetherapyaloneinpancreaticcancerpatientsaged75yearsastudyprotocolforanopenlabelrandomisedfeasibilitystudy
AT saitoakikom randomisedcontrolledtrialofgemcitabinehydrochloridepluss1combinationtherapyversusgemcitabinehydrochloridetherapyaloneinpancreaticcancerpatientsaged75yearsastudyprotocolforanopenlabelrandomisedfeasibilitystudy
AT sekimotomitsugu randomisedcontrolledtrialofgemcitabinehydrochloridepluss1combinationtherapyversusgemcitabinehydrochloridetherapyaloneinpancreaticcancerpatientsaged75yearsastudyprotocolforanopenlabelrandomisedfeasibilitystudy