Cargando…

Targeted versus non-targeted HIV testing offered via electronic questionnaire in a Swiss emergency department: A randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND: In Switzerland, the national HIV testing recommendations propose targeted testing. Although the emergency department (ED) is mentioned specifically as a site where HIV testing should take place, the testing rate in our ED is 1% of patients seen. The aim of this study was to use electroni...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gillet, Cleo, Darling, Katharine E. A., Senn, Nicolas, Cavassini, Matthias, Hugli, Olivier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5841645/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29513659
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190767
_version_ 1783304776820195328
author Gillet, Cleo
Darling, Katharine E. A.
Senn, Nicolas
Cavassini, Matthias
Hugli, Olivier
author_facet Gillet, Cleo
Darling, Katharine E. A.
Senn, Nicolas
Cavassini, Matthias
Hugli, Olivier
author_sort Gillet, Cleo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In Switzerland, the national HIV testing recommendations propose targeted testing. Although the emergency department (ED) is mentioned specifically as a site where HIV testing should take place, the testing rate in our ED is 1% of patients seen. The aim of this study was to use electronic tablets to offer testing to ED patients and to examine whether non-targeted screening increased testing rates compared to targeted testing. METHODS: This randomised, cross-over design study took place at Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland, between August and November 2015. Eligible patients were randomised to a targeted testing or a non-targeted screening arm. Using electronic tablets, targeted arm patients completed a risk factor assessment; patients with risk factors were offered free rapid HIV testing. Non-targeted arm patients received information about HIV and HIV testing on their tablet and were then offered testing. In a second step, patients who declined testing were crossed over to the other strategy. The primary endpoint was the HIV testing rate per arm. RESULTS: Eighty patients were recruited to each study arm. In the targeted arm, 17 patients (of 80, 21%) had at least one risk factor and were offered testing, of whom eight (of 17, 47%) accepted. HIV testing rate in the targeted arm was 10% (8/80) compared to 48% (38/80) in the non-targeted arm (P<0.001). Secondary cross–screening, where targeted arm patients without risk factors were offered non-targeted screening, increased the testing rate in the targeted arm to 45% (36/80). Among patients offered testing, the acceptance rate did not differ between targeted and non-targeted arms, at 48% and 53%, respectively (P = 0.9) DISCUSSION: In our centre, non-targeted HIV screening resulted in a higher testing rate than targeted testing due to more patients being offered a test. The acceptance rate of testing offered did not differ between targeted and non-targeted arms. Electronic tablets were well-received by patients and easy to use. We conclude that non-targeted HIV screening using electronic tablets would increase the HIV testing rate in our ED. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03038724
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5841645
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58416452018-03-23 Targeted versus non-targeted HIV testing offered via electronic questionnaire in a Swiss emergency department: A randomized controlled study Gillet, Cleo Darling, Katharine E. A. Senn, Nicolas Cavassini, Matthias Hugli, Olivier PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: In Switzerland, the national HIV testing recommendations propose targeted testing. Although the emergency department (ED) is mentioned specifically as a site where HIV testing should take place, the testing rate in our ED is 1% of patients seen. The aim of this study was to use electronic tablets to offer testing to ED patients and to examine whether non-targeted screening increased testing rates compared to targeted testing. METHODS: This randomised, cross-over design study took place at Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland, between August and November 2015. Eligible patients were randomised to a targeted testing or a non-targeted screening arm. Using electronic tablets, targeted arm patients completed a risk factor assessment; patients with risk factors were offered free rapid HIV testing. Non-targeted arm patients received information about HIV and HIV testing on their tablet and were then offered testing. In a second step, patients who declined testing were crossed over to the other strategy. The primary endpoint was the HIV testing rate per arm. RESULTS: Eighty patients were recruited to each study arm. In the targeted arm, 17 patients (of 80, 21%) had at least one risk factor and were offered testing, of whom eight (of 17, 47%) accepted. HIV testing rate in the targeted arm was 10% (8/80) compared to 48% (38/80) in the non-targeted arm (P<0.001). Secondary cross–screening, where targeted arm patients without risk factors were offered non-targeted screening, increased the testing rate in the targeted arm to 45% (36/80). Among patients offered testing, the acceptance rate did not differ between targeted and non-targeted arms, at 48% and 53%, respectively (P = 0.9) DISCUSSION: In our centre, non-targeted HIV screening resulted in a higher testing rate than targeted testing due to more patients being offered a test. The acceptance rate of testing offered did not differ between targeted and non-targeted arms. Electronic tablets were well-received by patients and easy to use. We conclude that non-targeted HIV screening using electronic tablets would increase the HIV testing rate in our ED. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03038724 Public Library of Science 2018-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5841645/ /pubmed/29513659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190767 Text en © 2018 Gillet et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gillet, Cleo
Darling, Katharine E. A.
Senn, Nicolas
Cavassini, Matthias
Hugli, Olivier
Targeted versus non-targeted HIV testing offered via electronic questionnaire in a Swiss emergency department: A randomized controlled study
title Targeted versus non-targeted HIV testing offered via electronic questionnaire in a Swiss emergency department: A randomized controlled study
title_full Targeted versus non-targeted HIV testing offered via electronic questionnaire in a Swiss emergency department: A randomized controlled study
title_fullStr Targeted versus non-targeted HIV testing offered via electronic questionnaire in a Swiss emergency department: A randomized controlled study
title_full_unstemmed Targeted versus non-targeted HIV testing offered via electronic questionnaire in a Swiss emergency department: A randomized controlled study
title_short Targeted versus non-targeted HIV testing offered via electronic questionnaire in a Swiss emergency department: A randomized controlled study
title_sort targeted versus non-targeted hiv testing offered via electronic questionnaire in a swiss emergency department: a randomized controlled study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5841645/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29513659
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190767
work_keys_str_mv AT gilletcleo targetedversusnontargetedhivtestingofferedviaelectronicquestionnaireinaswissemergencydepartmentarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT darlingkatharineea targetedversusnontargetedhivtestingofferedviaelectronicquestionnaireinaswissemergencydepartmentarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT sennnicolas targetedversusnontargetedhivtestingofferedviaelectronicquestionnaireinaswissemergencydepartmentarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT cavassinimatthias targetedversusnontargetedhivtestingofferedviaelectronicquestionnaireinaswissemergencydepartmentarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT hugliolivier targetedversusnontargetedhivtestingofferedviaelectronicquestionnaireinaswissemergencydepartmentarandomizedcontrolledstudy