Cargando…
Targeted versus non-targeted HIV testing offered via electronic questionnaire in a Swiss emergency department: A randomized controlled study
BACKGROUND: In Switzerland, the national HIV testing recommendations propose targeted testing. Although the emergency department (ED) is mentioned specifically as a site where HIV testing should take place, the testing rate in our ED is 1% of patients seen. The aim of this study was to use electroni...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5841645/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29513659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190767 |
_version_ | 1783304776820195328 |
---|---|
author | Gillet, Cleo Darling, Katharine E. A. Senn, Nicolas Cavassini, Matthias Hugli, Olivier |
author_facet | Gillet, Cleo Darling, Katharine E. A. Senn, Nicolas Cavassini, Matthias Hugli, Olivier |
author_sort | Gillet, Cleo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In Switzerland, the national HIV testing recommendations propose targeted testing. Although the emergency department (ED) is mentioned specifically as a site where HIV testing should take place, the testing rate in our ED is 1% of patients seen. The aim of this study was to use electronic tablets to offer testing to ED patients and to examine whether non-targeted screening increased testing rates compared to targeted testing. METHODS: This randomised, cross-over design study took place at Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland, between August and November 2015. Eligible patients were randomised to a targeted testing or a non-targeted screening arm. Using electronic tablets, targeted arm patients completed a risk factor assessment; patients with risk factors were offered free rapid HIV testing. Non-targeted arm patients received information about HIV and HIV testing on their tablet and were then offered testing. In a second step, patients who declined testing were crossed over to the other strategy. The primary endpoint was the HIV testing rate per arm. RESULTS: Eighty patients were recruited to each study arm. In the targeted arm, 17 patients (of 80, 21%) had at least one risk factor and were offered testing, of whom eight (of 17, 47%) accepted. HIV testing rate in the targeted arm was 10% (8/80) compared to 48% (38/80) in the non-targeted arm (P<0.001). Secondary cross–screening, where targeted arm patients without risk factors were offered non-targeted screening, increased the testing rate in the targeted arm to 45% (36/80). Among patients offered testing, the acceptance rate did not differ between targeted and non-targeted arms, at 48% and 53%, respectively (P = 0.9) DISCUSSION: In our centre, non-targeted HIV screening resulted in a higher testing rate than targeted testing due to more patients being offered a test. The acceptance rate of testing offered did not differ between targeted and non-targeted arms. Electronic tablets were well-received by patients and easy to use. We conclude that non-targeted HIV screening using electronic tablets would increase the HIV testing rate in our ED. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03038724 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5841645 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58416452018-03-23 Targeted versus non-targeted HIV testing offered via electronic questionnaire in a Swiss emergency department: A randomized controlled study Gillet, Cleo Darling, Katharine E. A. Senn, Nicolas Cavassini, Matthias Hugli, Olivier PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: In Switzerland, the national HIV testing recommendations propose targeted testing. Although the emergency department (ED) is mentioned specifically as a site where HIV testing should take place, the testing rate in our ED is 1% of patients seen. The aim of this study was to use electronic tablets to offer testing to ED patients and to examine whether non-targeted screening increased testing rates compared to targeted testing. METHODS: This randomised, cross-over design study took place at Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland, between August and November 2015. Eligible patients were randomised to a targeted testing or a non-targeted screening arm. Using electronic tablets, targeted arm patients completed a risk factor assessment; patients with risk factors were offered free rapid HIV testing. Non-targeted arm patients received information about HIV and HIV testing on their tablet and were then offered testing. In a second step, patients who declined testing were crossed over to the other strategy. The primary endpoint was the HIV testing rate per arm. RESULTS: Eighty patients were recruited to each study arm. In the targeted arm, 17 patients (of 80, 21%) had at least one risk factor and were offered testing, of whom eight (of 17, 47%) accepted. HIV testing rate in the targeted arm was 10% (8/80) compared to 48% (38/80) in the non-targeted arm (P<0.001). Secondary cross–screening, where targeted arm patients without risk factors were offered non-targeted screening, increased the testing rate in the targeted arm to 45% (36/80). Among patients offered testing, the acceptance rate did not differ between targeted and non-targeted arms, at 48% and 53%, respectively (P = 0.9) DISCUSSION: In our centre, non-targeted HIV screening resulted in a higher testing rate than targeted testing due to more patients being offered a test. The acceptance rate of testing offered did not differ between targeted and non-targeted arms. Electronic tablets were well-received by patients and easy to use. We conclude that non-targeted HIV screening using electronic tablets would increase the HIV testing rate in our ED. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03038724 Public Library of Science 2018-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5841645/ /pubmed/29513659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190767 Text en © 2018 Gillet et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Gillet, Cleo Darling, Katharine E. A. Senn, Nicolas Cavassini, Matthias Hugli, Olivier Targeted versus non-targeted HIV testing offered via electronic questionnaire in a Swiss emergency department: A randomized controlled study |
title | Targeted versus non-targeted HIV testing offered via electronic questionnaire in a Swiss emergency department: A randomized controlled study |
title_full | Targeted versus non-targeted HIV testing offered via electronic questionnaire in a Swiss emergency department: A randomized controlled study |
title_fullStr | Targeted versus non-targeted HIV testing offered via electronic questionnaire in a Swiss emergency department: A randomized controlled study |
title_full_unstemmed | Targeted versus non-targeted HIV testing offered via electronic questionnaire in a Swiss emergency department: A randomized controlled study |
title_short | Targeted versus non-targeted HIV testing offered via electronic questionnaire in a Swiss emergency department: A randomized controlled study |
title_sort | targeted versus non-targeted hiv testing offered via electronic questionnaire in a swiss emergency department: a randomized controlled study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5841645/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29513659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190767 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gilletcleo targetedversusnontargetedhivtestingofferedviaelectronicquestionnaireinaswissemergencydepartmentarandomizedcontrolledstudy AT darlingkatharineea targetedversusnontargetedhivtestingofferedviaelectronicquestionnaireinaswissemergencydepartmentarandomizedcontrolledstudy AT sennnicolas targetedversusnontargetedhivtestingofferedviaelectronicquestionnaireinaswissemergencydepartmentarandomizedcontrolledstudy AT cavassinimatthias targetedversusnontargetedhivtestingofferedviaelectronicquestionnaireinaswissemergencydepartmentarandomizedcontrolledstudy AT hugliolivier targetedversusnontargetedhivtestingofferedviaelectronicquestionnaireinaswissemergencydepartmentarandomizedcontrolledstudy |