Cargando…

Examination of Resistance Settings Based on Body Weight for the 3-Minute All-Out Critical Power Test

There are conflicting suggestions regarding the most valid resistance (3–5% of body weight) to use for the critical power (CP) 3-min all-out (CP(3min)) test to estimate CP and anaerobic work capacity (AWC). The purpose of this study was to determine if the CP and AWC estimates from the CP(3min) test...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: SCHULTE, MARLENE J., CLASEY, JODY L., FLEENOR, BRADLEY S., BERGSTROM, HALEY C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Berkeley Electronic Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5841676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29541334
_version_ 1783304784222093312
author SCHULTE, MARLENE J.
CLASEY, JODY L.
FLEENOR, BRADLEY S.
BERGSTROM, HALEY C.
author_facet SCHULTE, MARLENE J.
CLASEY, JODY L.
FLEENOR, BRADLEY S.
BERGSTROM, HALEY C.
author_sort SCHULTE, MARLENE J.
collection PubMed
description There are conflicting suggestions regarding the most valid resistance (3–5% of body weight) to use for the critical power (CP) 3-min all-out (CP(3min)) test to estimate CP and anaerobic work capacity (AWC). The purpose of this study was to determine if the CP and AWC estimates from the CP(3min) test were affected by the percentage of body weight used to set the resistance on a Monark cycle ergometer. Ten recreationally trained participants (mean ± SD: Age: 22.2 ± 2.2 yrs.) completed the CP(3min) test at resistances of 4.5% (CP(4.5%)) and 3% (CP(3%)) of body weight to determine the CP and AWC. There were no significant differences between the CP(4.5%) (167 ± 34 W) and CP(3%) (156 ± 36 W) estimates. The AWC(3%) (5.6 ± 2.5 kJ) estimates were significantly lower than the AWC(4.5%) (9.0 ± 4.0 kJ). The CP and AWC estimates from the CP(4.5%) were consistent with values reported in the literature, however, the AWC estimate from the CP(3%) was lower than typically reported. These findings suggested that a resistance set at 3% of body weight for the CP(3min) test may be too low to accurately estimate AWC, but 3% and 4.5% resulted in the same estimation of CP. Thus, the principal finding of this study was that a resistance of 4.5% of body weight for CP(3-min) in recreationally trained participants resulted in more accurate estimates of AWC, compared to a resistance of 3%, and supports the use of 4.5% body weight resistance to measure both CP and AWC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5841676
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Berkeley Electronic Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58416762018-03-12 Examination of Resistance Settings Based on Body Weight for the 3-Minute All-Out Critical Power Test SCHULTE, MARLENE J. CLASEY, JODY L. FLEENOR, BRADLEY S. BERGSTROM, HALEY C. Int J Exerc Sci Original Research There are conflicting suggestions regarding the most valid resistance (3–5% of body weight) to use for the critical power (CP) 3-min all-out (CP(3min)) test to estimate CP and anaerobic work capacity (AWC). The purpose of this study was to determine if the CP and AWC estimates from the CP(3min) test were affected by the percentage of body weight used to set the resistance on a Monark cycle ergometer. Ten recreationally trained participants (mean ± SD: Age: 22.2 ± 2.2 yrs.) completed the CP(3min) test at resistances of 4.5% (CP(4.5%)) and 3% (CP(3%)) of body weight to determine the CP and AWC. There were no significant differences between the CP(4.5%) (167 ± 34 W) and CP(3%) (156 ± 36 W) estimates. The AWC(3%) (5.6 ± 2.5 kJ) estimates were significantly lower than the AWC(4.5%) (9.0 ± 4.0 kJ). The CP and AWC estimates from the CP(4.5%) were consistent with values reported in the literature, however, the AWC estimate from the CP(3%) was lower than typically reported. These findings suggested that a resistance set at 3% of body weight for the CP(3min) test may be too low to accurately estimate AWC, but 3% and 4.5% resulted in the same estimation of CP. Thus, the principal finding of this study was that a resistance of 4.5% of body weight for CP(3-min) in recreationally trained participants resulted in more accurate estimates of AWC, compared to a resistance of 3%, and supports the use of 4.5% body weight resistance to measure both CP and AWC. Berkeley Electronic Press 2018-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5841676/ /pubmed/29541334 Text en
spellingShingle Original Research
SCHULTE, MARLENE J.
CLASEY, JODY L.
FLEENOR, BRADLEY S.
BERGSTROM, HALEY C.
Examination of Resistance Settings Based on Body Weight for the 3-Minute All-Out Critical Power Test
title Examination of Resistance Settings Based on Body Weight for the 3-Minute All-Out Critical Power Test
title_full Examination of Resistance Settings Based on Body Weight for the 3-Minute All-Out Critical Power Test
title_fullStr Examination of Resistance Settings Based on Body Weight for the 3-Minute All-Out Critical Power Test
title_full_unstemmed Examination of Resistance Settings Based on Body Weight for the 3-Minute All-Out Critical Power Test
title_short Examination of Resistance Settings Based on Body Weight for the 3-Minute All-Out Critical Power Test
title_sort examination of resistance settings based on body weight for the 3-minute all-out critical power test
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5841676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29541334
work_keys_str_mv AT schultemarlenej examinationofresistancesettingsbasedonbodyweightforthe3minutealloutcriticalpowertest
AT claseyjodyl examinationofresistancesettingsbasedonbodyweightforthe3minutealloutcriticalpowertest
AT fleenorbradleys examinationofresistancesettingsbasedonbodyweightforthe3minutealloutcriticalpowertest
AT bergstromhaleyc examinationofresistancesettingsbasedonbodyweightforthe3minutealloutcriticalpowertest