Cargando…

Central Hemodynamics Measured During 5 Repetition Maximum Free Weight Resistance Exercise

The PhysioFlow™ is a piece of equipment that uses bioimpedance cardiography to measure central hemodynamics. The purpose of this research was to explore the novel approach of monitoring central hemodynamics during free weight resistance exercise using bioimpedance cardiography throughout a 5 repetit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: HOWARD, JONATHAN S., MCLESTER, CHERILYN N., EVANS, THOMAS W., MCLESTER, JOHN R., CALLOWAY, JIMMY P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Berkeley Electronic Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5841678/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29541330
_version_ 1783304784691855360
author HOWARD, JONATHAN S.
MCLESTER, CHERILYN N.
EVANS, THOMAS W.
MCLESTER, JOHN R.
CALLOWAY, JIMMY P.
author_facet HOWARD, JONATHAN S.
MCLESTER, CHERILYN N.
EVANS, THOMAS W.
MCLESTER, JOHN R.
CALLOWAY, JIMMY P.
author_sort HOWARD, JONATHAN S.
collection PubMed
description The PhysioFlow™ is a piece of equipment that uses bioimpedance cardiography to measure central hemodynamics. The purpose of this research was to explore the novel approach of monitoring central hemodynamics during free weight resistance exercise using bioimpedance cardiography throughout a 5 repetition maximum (5RM). Thirty participants ranging from beginner to advanced lifters (16 males and 14 females) completed a 5RM for back squat, seated push press, and bicep curl while connected to the PhysioFlow™ to assess the response of heart rate (HR), stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (Q), and ejection fraction (EF). Participants were cued for form and to breathe normally throughout the lifts. The PhysioFlow™ detected an increase in HR and Q for all lifts between rest and each repetition (p < 0.05). There was also an increase in HR and Q from repetition 1 to repetition 5 for all lifts (p < 0.05). No changes in EF or SV were detected between resting measurements and each repetition for all lifts (p > 0.05) and no changes in EF or SV were detected when all repetitions were compared to each other for all lifts (p > 0.05). In conclusion, the PhysioFlow™ was able to detect changes in HR and Q during dynamic free weight resistance exercise. This novel approach may provide a mechanism for monitoring central hemodynamics during free weight resistance training. However, more research needs to be conducted as the exercise protocol for this investigation did not allow for a comparison to a reference method.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5841678
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Berkeley Electronic Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58416782018-03-12 Central Hemodynamics Measured During 5 Repetition Maximum Free Weight Resistance Exercise HOWARD, JONATHAN S. MCLESTER, CHERILYN N. EVANS, THOMAS W. MCLESTER, JOHN R. CALLOWAY, JIMMY P. Int J Exerc Sci Technical Note The PhysioFlow™ is a piece of equipment that uses bioimpedance cardiography to measure central hemodynamics. The purpose of this research was to explore the novel approach of monitoring central hemodynamics during free weight resistance exercise using bioimpedance cardiography throughout a 5 repetition maximum (5RM). Thirty participants ranging from beginner to advanced lifters (16 males and 14 females) completed a 5RM for back squat, seated push press, and bicep curl while connected to the PhysioFlow™ to assess the response of heart rate (HR), stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (Q), and ejection fraction (EF). Participants were cued for form and to breathe normally throughout the lifts. The PhysioFlow™ detected an increase in HR and Q for all lifts between rest and each repetition (p < 0.05). There was also an increase in HR and Q from repetition 1 to repetition 5 for all lifts (p < 0.05). No changes in EF or SV were detected between resting measurements and each repetition for all lifts (p > 0.05) and no changes in EF or SV were detected when all repetitions were compared to each other for all lifts (p > 0.05). In conclusion, the PhysioFlow™ was able to detect changes in HR and Q during dynamic free weight resistance exercise. This novel approach may provide a mechanism for monitoring central hemodynamics during free weight resistance training. However, more research needs to be conducted as the exercise protocol for this investigation did not allow for a comparison to a reference method. Berkeley Electronic Press 2018-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5841678/ /pubmed/29541330 Text en
spellingShingle Technical Note
HOWARD, JONATHAN S.
MCLESTER, CHERILYN N.
EVANS, THOMAS W.
MCLESTER, JOHN R.
CALLOWAY, JIMMY P.
Central Hemodynamics Measured During 5 Repetition Maximum Free Weight Resistance Exercise
title Central Hemodynamics Measured During 5 Repetition Maximum Free Weight Resistance Exercise
title_full Central Hemodynamics Measured During 5 Repetition Maximum Free Weight Resistance Exercise
title_fullStr Central Hemodynamics Measured During 5 Repetition Maximum Free Weight Resistance Exercise
title_full_unstemmed Central Hemodynamics Measured During 5 Repetition Maximum Free Weight Resistance Exercise
title_short Central Hemodynamics Measured During 5 Repetition Maximum Free Weight Resistance Exercise
title_sort central hemodynamics measured during 5 repetition maximum free weight resistance exercise
topic Technical Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5841678/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29541330
work_keys_str_mv AT howardjonathans centralhemodynamicsmeasuredduring5repetitionmaximumfreeweightresistanceexercise
AT mclestercherilynn centralhemodynamicsmeasuredduring5repetitionmaximumfreeweightresistanceexercise
AT evansthomasw centralhemodynamicsmeasuredduring5repetitionmaximumfreeweightresistanceexercise
AT mclesterjohnr centralhemodynamicsmeasuredduring5repetitionmaximumfreeweightresistanceexercise
AT callowayjimmyp centralhemodynamicsmeasuredduring5repetitionmaximumfreeweightresistanceexercise