Cargando…

Health and health risk behaviour of adolescents—Differences according to family structure. Results of the German KiGGS cohort study

OBJECTIVE: This study’s aim was to investigate the association between family structure and different health-related outcomes in adolescence (self-rated health, emotional and behavioural problems, health-related quality of life, regular smoking, and heavy episodic drinking). Furthermore, we analysed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rattay, Petra, von der Lippe, Elena, Mauz, Elvira, Richter, Felicitas, Hölling, Heike, Lange, Cornelia, Lampert, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5841741/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29513693
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192968
_version_ 1783304787357335552
author Rattay, Petra
von der Lippe, Elena
Mauz, Elvira
Richter, Felicitas
Hölling, Heike
Lange, Cornelia
Lampert, Thomas
author_facet Rattay, Petra
von der Lippe, Elena
Mauz, Elvira
Richter, Felicitas
Hölling, Heike
Lange, Cornelia
Lampert, Thomas
author_sort Rattay, Petra
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study’s aim was to investigate the association between family structure and different health-related outcomes in adolescence (self-rated health, emotional and behavioural problems, health-related quality of life, regular smoking, and heavy episodic drinking). Furthermore, we analysed the extent to which socio-economic status, family cohesion and the pre-transition health status explain family structure-related health disparities. METHODS: We used longitudinal data from the first two waves of the German KiGGS cohort study carried out by the Robert Koch Institute (baseline: 2003–2006, follow-up: 2009–2012). The sample comprised 4,692 respondents aged 11 to 17 years. Using data from both waves, effects of family structure on health status at follow-up were calculated applying linear and logistic regression models. RESULTS: We found that adolescents continuously living with both birth parents were in good health. Adolescents whose parents separated after the baseline survey, reported poorer health and were more likely to smoke. The transition from stepfamily to single parent family was also associated with a higher risk of regular smoking. Lower health-related quality of life as well as higher scores for emotional and behavioural problems occurred in almost all non-nuclear family structures, although not all effects were statistically significant. No significant effects of family structure on heavy episodic drinking were found. While family cohesion mediated the effects of family structure on adolescents’ health, the mediating effect of socio-economic status was small. After controlling for pre-transition health, the effects were even lower. CONCLUSIONS: Because the direct effects of family structure on adolescents’ health were small and family cohesion was found to be an important mediator in the association between family structure and adolescents’ health, prevention programmes and interventions should be directed towards the parent–adolescent relationship rather than just the family structure, in order to minimize the psychosocial stress of adolescents during the period of family transition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5841741
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58417412018-03-23 Health and health risk behaviour of adolescents—Differences according to family structure. Results of the German KiGGS cohort study Rattay, Petra von der Lippe, Elena Mauz, Elvira Richter, Felicitas Hölling, Heike Lange, Cornelia Lampert, Thomas PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: This study’s aim was to investigate the association between family structure and different health-related outcomes in adolescence (self-rated health, emotional and behavioural problems, health-related quality of life, regular smoking, and heavy episodic drinking). Furthermore, we analysed the extent to which socio-economic status, family cohesion and the pre-transition health status explain family structure-related health disparities. METHODS: We used longitudinal data from the first two waves of the German KiGGS cohort study carried out by the Robert Koch Institute (baseline: 2003–2006, follow-up: 2009–2012). The sample comprised 4,692 respondents aged 11 to 17 years. Using data from both waves, effects of family structure on health status at follow-up were calculated applying linear and logistic regression models. RESULTS: We found that adolescents continuously living with both birth parents were in good health. Adolescents whose parents separated after the baseline survey, reported poorer health and were more likely to smoke. The transition from stepfamily to single parent family was also associated with a higher risk of regular smoking. Lower health-related quality of life as well as higher scores for emotional and behavioural problems occurred in almost all non-nuclear family structures, although not all effects were statistically significant. No significant effects of family structure on heavy episodic drinking were found. While family cohesion mediated the effects of family structure on adolescents’ health, the mediating effect of socio-economic status was small. After controlling for pre-transition health, the effects were even lower. CONCLUSIONS: Because the direct effects of family structure on adolescents’ health were small and family cohesion was found to be an important mediator in the association between family structure and adolescents’ health, prevention programmes and interventions should be directed towards the parent–adolescent relationship rather than just the family structure, in order to minimize the psychosocial stress of adolescents during the period of family transition. Public Library of Science 2018-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5841741/ /pubmed/29513693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192968 Text en © 2018 Rattay et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rattay, Petra
von der Lippe, Elena
Mauz, Elvira
Richter, Felicitas
Hölling, Heike
Lange, Cornelia
Lampert, Thomas
Health and health risk behaviour of adolescents—Differences according to family structure. Results of the German KiGGS cohort study
title Health and health risk behaviour of adolescents—Differences according to family structure. Results of the German KiGGS cohort study
title_full Health and health risk behaviour of adolescents—Differences according to family structure. Results of the German KiGGS cohort study
title_fullStr Health and health risk behaviour of adolescents—Differences according to family structure. Results of the German KiGGS cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Health and health risk behaviour of adolescents—Differences according to family structure. Results of the German KiGGS cohort study
title_short Health and health risk behaviour of adolescents—Differences according to family structure. Results of the German KiGGS cohort study
title_sort health and health risk behaviour of adolescents—differences according to family structure. results of the german kiggs cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5841741/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29513693
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192968
work_keys_str_mv AT rattaypetra healthandhealthriskbehaviourofadolescentsdifferencesaccordingtofamilystructureresultsofthegermankiggscohortstudy
AT vonderlippeelena healthandhealthriskbehaviourofadolescentsdifferencesaccordingtofamilystructureresultsofthegermankiggscohortstudy
AT mauzelvira healthandhealthriskbehaviourofadolescentsdifferencesaccordingtofamilystructureresultsofthegermankiggscohortstudy
AT richterfelicitas healthandhealthriskbehaviourofadolescentsdifferencesaccordingtofamilystructureresultsofthegermankiggscohortstudy
AT hollingheike healthandhealthriskbehaviourofadolescentsdifferencesaccordingtofamilystructureresultsofthegermankiggscohortstudy
AT langecornelia healthandhealthriskbehaviourofadolescentsdifferencesaccordingtofamilystructureresultsofthegermankiggscohortstudy
AT lampertthomas healthandhealthriskbehaviourofadolescentsdifferencesaccordingtofamilystructureresultsofthegermankiggscohortstudy