Cargando…

Do gifts increase consent to home-based HIV testing? A difference-in-differences study in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

Background: Despite the importance of HIV testing for controlling the HIV epidemic, testing rates remain low. Efforts to scale up testing coverage and frequency in hard-to-reach and at-risk populations commonly focus on home-based HIV testing. This study evaluates the effect of a gift (a US$5 food v...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McGovern, Mark E, Herbst, Kobus, Tanser, Frank, Mutevedzi, Tinofa, Canning, David, Gareta, Dickman, Pillay, Deenan, Bärnighausen, Till
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5841834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27940483
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyw122
_version_ 1783304808394915840
author McGovern, Mark E
Herbst, Kobus
Tanser, Frank
Mutevedzi, Tinofa
Canning, David
Gareta, Dickman
Pillay, Deenan
Bärnighausen, Till
author_facet McGovern, Mark E
Herbst, Kobus
Tanser, Frank
Mutevedzi, Tinofa
Canning, David
Gareta, Dickman
Pillay, Deenan
Bärnighausen, Till
author_sort McGovern, Mark E
collection PubMed
description Background: Despite the importance of HIV testing for controlling the HIV epidemic, testing rates remain low. Efforts to scale up testing coverage and frequency in hard-to-reach and at-risk populations commonly focus on home-based HIV testing. This study evaluates the effect of a gift (a US$5 food voucher for families) on consent rates for home-based HIV testing. Methods: We use data on 18 478 individuals (6 418 men and 12 060 women) who were successfully contacted to participate in the 2009 and 2010 population-based HIV surveillance carried out by the Wellcome Trust's Africa Health Research Institute in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Of 18 478 potential participants contacted in both years, 35% (6 518) consented to test in 2009, and 41% (7 533) consented to test in 2010. Our quasi-experimental difference-in-differences approach controls for unobserved confounding in estimating the causal effect of the intervention on HIV-testing consent rates. Results: Allocation of the gift to a family in 2010 increased the probability of family members consenting to test in the same year by 25 percentage points [95% confidence interval (CI) 21–30 percentage points; P < 0.001]. The intervention effect persisted, slightly attenuated, in the year following the intervention (2011). Conclusions: In HIV hyperendemic settings, a gift can be highly effective at increasing consent rates for home-based HIV testing. Given the importance of HIV testing for treatment uptake and individual health, as well as for HIV treatment-as-prevention strategies and for monitoring the population impact of the HIV response, gifts should be considered as a supportive intervention for HIV-testing initiatives where consent rates have been low.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5841834
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58418342018-03-28 Do gifts increase consent to home-based HIV testing? A difference-in-differences study in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa McGovern, Mark E Herbst, Kobus Tanser, Frank Mutevedzi, Tinofa Canning, David Gareta, Dickman Pillay, Deenan Bärnighausen, Till Int J Epidemiol Interventions Background: Despite the importance of HIV testing for controlling the HIV epidemic, testing rates remain low. Efforts to scale up testing coverage and frequency in hard-to-reach and at-risk populations commonly focus on home-based HIV testing. This study evaluates the effect of a gift (a US$5 food voucher for families) on consent rates for home-based HIV testing. Methods: We use data on 18 478 individuals (6 418 men and 12 060 women) who were successfully contacted to participate in the 2009 and 2010 population-based HIV surveillance carried out by the Wellcome Trust's Africa Health Research Institute in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Of 18 478 potential participants contacted in both years, 35% (6 518) consented to test in 2009, and 41% (7 533) consented to test in 2010. Our quasi-experimental difference-in-differences approach controls for unobserved confounding in estimating the causal effect of the intervention on HIV-testing consent rates. Results: Allocation of the gift to a family in 2010 increased the probability of family members consenting to test in the same year by 25 percentage points [95% confidence interval (CI) 21–30 percentage points; P < 0.001]. The intervention effect persisted, slightly attenuated, in the year following the intervention (2011). Conclusions: In HIV hyperendemic settings, a gift can be highly effective at increasing consent rates for home-based HIV testing. Given the importance of HIV testing for treatment uptake and individual health, as well as for HIV treatment-as-prevention strategies and for monitoring the population impact of the HIV response, gifts should be considered as a supportive intervention for HIV-testing initiatives where consent rates have been low. Oxford University Press 2016-12 2016-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5841834/ /pubmed/27940483 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyw122 Text en © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Interventions
McGovern, Mark E
Herbst, Kobus
Tanser, Frank
Mutevedzi, Tinofa
Canning, David
Gareta, Dickman
Pillay, Deenan
Bärnighausen, Till
Do gifts increase consent to home-based HIV testing? A difference-in-differences study in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
title Do gifts increase consent to home-based HIV testing? A difference-in-differences study in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
title_full Do gifts increase consent to home-based HIV testing? A difference-in-differences study in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
title_fullStr Do gifts increase consent to home-based HIV testing? A difference-in-differences study in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
title_full_unstemmed Do gifts increase consent to home-based HIV testing? A difference-in-differences study in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
title_short Do gifts increase consent to home-based HIV testing? A difference-in-differences study in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
title_sort do gifts increase consent to home-based hiv testing? a difference-in-differences study in rural kwazulu-natal, south africa
topic Interventions
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5841834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27940483
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyw122
work_keys_str_mv AT mcgovernmarke dogiftsincreaseconsenttohomebasedhivtestingadifferenceindifferencesstudyinruralkwazulunatalsouthafrica
AT herbstkobus dogiftsincreaseconsenttohomebasedhivtestingadifferenceindifferencesstudyinruralkwazulunatalsouthafrica
AT tanserfrank dogiftsincreaseconsenttohomebasedhivtestingadifferenceindifferencesstudyinruralkwazulunatalsouthafrica
AT mutevedzitinofa dogiftsincreaseconsenttohomebasedhivtestingadifferenceindifferencesstudyinruralkwazulunatalsouthafrica
AT canningdavid dogiftsincreaseconsenttohomebasedhivtestingadifferenceindifferencesstudyinruralkwazulunatalsouthafrica
AT garetadickman dogiftsincreaseconsenttohomebasedhivtestingadifferenceindifferencesstudyinruralkwazulunatalsouthafrica
AT pillaydeenan dogiftsincreaseconsenttohomebasedhivtestingadifferenceindifferencesstudyinruralkwazulunatalsouthafrica
AT barnighausentill dogiftsincreaseconsenttohomebasedhivtestingadifferenceindifferencesstudyinruralkwazulunatalsouthafrica