Cargando…
Do gifts increase consent to home-based HIV testing? A difference-in-differences study in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
Background: Despite the importance of HIV testing for controlling the HIV epidemic, testing rates remain low. Efforts to scale up testing coverage and frequency in hard-to-reach and at-risk populations commonly focus on home-based HIV testing. This study evaluates the effect of a gift (a US$5 food v...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5841834/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27940483 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyw122 |
_version_ | 1783304808394915840 |
---|---|
author | McGovern, Mark E Herbst, Kobus Tanser, Frank Mutevedzi, Tinofa Canning, David Gareta, Dickman Pillay, Deenan Bärnighausen, Till |
author_facet | McGovern, Mark E Herbst, Kobus Tanser, Frank Mutevedzi, Tinofa Canning, David Gareta, Dickman Pillay, Deenan Bärnighausen, Till |
author_sort | McGovern, Mark E |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Despite the importance of HIV testing for controlling the HIV epidemic, testing rates remain low. Efforts to scale up testing coverage and frequency in hard-to-reach and at-risk populations commonly focus on home-based HIV testing. This study evaluates the effect of a gift (a US$5 food voucher for families) on consent rates for home-based HIV testing. Methods: We use data on 18 478 individuals (6 418 men and 12 060 women) who were successfully contacted to participate in the 2009 and 2010 population-based HIV surveillance carried out by the Wellcome Trust's Africa Health Research Institute in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Of 18 478 potential participants contacted in both years, 35% (6 518) consented to test in 2009, and 41% (7 533) consented to test in 2010. Our quasi-experimental difference-in-differences approach controls for unobserved confounding in estimating the causal effect of the intervention on HIV-testing consent rates. Results: Allocation of the gift to a family in 2010 increased the probability of family members consenting to test in the same year by 25 percentage points [95% confidence interval (CI) 21–30 percentage points; P < 0.001]. The intervention effect persisted, slightly attenuated, in the year following the intervention (2011). Conclusions: In HIV hyperendemic settings, a gift can be highly effective at increasing consent rates for home-based HIV testing. Given the importance of HIV testing for treatment uptake and individual health, as well as for HIV treatment-as-prevention strategies and for monitoring the population impact of the HIV response, gifts should be considered as a supportive intervention for HIV-testing initiatives where consent rates have been low. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5841834 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58418342018-03-28 Do gifts increase consent to home-based HIV testing? A difference-in-differences study in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa McGovern, Mark E Herbst, Kobus Tanser, Frank Mutevedzi, Tinofa Canning, David Gareta, Dickman Pillay, Deenan Bärnighausen, Till Int J Epidemiol Interventions Background: Despite the importance of HIV testing for controlling the HIV epidemic, testing rates remain low. Efforts to scale up testing coverage and frequency in hard-to-reach and at-risk populations commonly focus on home-based HIV testing. This study evaluates the effect of a gift (a US$5 food voucher for families) on consent rates for home-based HIV testing. Methods: We use data on 18 478 individuals (6 418 men and 12 060 women) who were successfully contacted to participate in the 2009 and 2010 population-based HIV surveillance carried out by the Wellcome Trust's Africa Health Research Institute in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Of 18 478 potential participants contacted in both years, 35% (6 518) consented to test in 2009, and 41% (7 533) consented to test in 2010. Our quasi-experimental difference-in-differences approach controls for unobserved confounding in estimating the causal effect of the intervention on HIV-testing consent rates. Results: Allocation of the gift to a family in 2010 increased the probability of family members consenting to test in the same year by 25 percentage points [95% confidence interval (CI) 21–30 percentage points; P < 0.001]. The intervention effect persisted, slightly attenuated, in the year following the intervention (2011). Conclusions: In HIV hyperendemic settings, a gift can be highly effective at increasing consent rates for home-based HIV testing. Given the importance of HIV testing for treatment uptake and individual health, as well as for HIV treatment-as-prevention strategies and for monitoring the population impact of the HIV response, gifts should be considered as a supportive intervention for HIV-testing initiatives where consent rates have been low. Oxford University Press 2016-12 2016-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5841834/ /pubmed/27940483 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyw122 Text en © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Interventions McGovern, Mark E Herbst, Kobus Tanser, Frank Mutevedzi, Tinofa Canning, David Gareta, Dickman Pillay, Deenan Bärnighausen, Till Do gifts increase consent to home-based HIV testing? A difference-in-differences study in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa |
title | Do gifts increase consent to home-based HIV testing? A difference-in-differences study in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa |
title_full | Do gifts increase consent to home-based HIV testing? A difference-in-differences study in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa |
title_fullStr | Do gifts increase consent to home-based HIV testing? A difference-in-differences study in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa |
title_full_unstemmed | Do gifts increase consent to home-based HIV testing? A difference-in-differences study in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa |
title_short | Do gifts increase consent to home-based HIV testing? A difference-in-differences study in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa |
title_sort | do gifts increase consent to home-based hiv testing? a difference-in-differences study in rural kwazulu-natal, south africa |
topic | Interventions |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5841834/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27940483 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyw122 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcgovernmarke dogiftsincreaseconsenttohomebasedhivtestingadifferenceindifferencesstudyinruralkwazulunatalsouthafrica AT herbstkobus dogiftsincreaseconsenttohomebasedhivtestingadifferenceindifferencesstudyinruralkwazulunatalsouthafrica AT tanserfrank dogiftsincreaseconsenttohomebasedhivtestingadifferenceindifferencesstudyinruralkwazulunatalsouthafrica AT mutevedzitinofa dogiftsincreaseconsenttohomebasedhivtestingadifferenceindifferencesstudyinruralkwazulunatalsouthafrica AT canningdavid dogiftsincreaseconsenttohomebasedhivtestingadifferenceindifferencesstudyinruralkwazulunatalsouthafrica AT garetadickman dogiftsincreaseconsenttohomebasedhivtestingadifferenceindifferencesstudyinruralkwazulunatalsouthafrica AT pillaydeenan dogiftsincreaseconsenttohomebasedhivtestingadifferenceindifferencesstudyinruralkwazulunatalsouthafrica AT barnighausentill dogiftsincreaseconsenttohomebasedhivtestingadifferenceindifferencesstudyinruralkwazulunatalsouthafrica |