Cargando…

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs for esophagectomy protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Esophageal cancer is one of the worst malignant digestive neoplasms with poor treatment outcomes. Esophagectomy plays an important role and offers a potential curable chance to these patients. However, esophagectomy with radical lymphadenectomy is known as one of the most invasive digest...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Feiyu, Wang, Wei, Wang, Chengde, Peng, Xiaonu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5842024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29465538
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010016
_version_ 1783304843069227008
author Liu, Feiyu
Wang, Wei
Wang, Chengde
Peng, Xiaonu
author_facet Liu, Feiyu
Wang, Wei
Wang, Chengde
Peng, Xiaonu
author_sort Liu, Feiyu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Esophageal cancer is one of the worst malignant digestive neoplasms with poor treatment outcomes. Esophagectomy plays an important role and offers a potential curable chance to these patients. However, esophagectomy with radical lymphadenectomy is known as one of the most invasive digestive surgeries which are associated with high morbidity and mortality. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol is a patient-centered, surgeon-led system combining anesthesia, nursing, nutrition, and psychology, which is designed for reducing complications, promoting recovery, and improving treatment outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis is aiming at how beneficial, and to what extent ERAS really will be. METHODS: A systematic literature search will be performed through January 2018 using MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar for relevant articles published in any language. Randomized controlled trials, prospective cohort studies, and propensity-matched comparative studies will be included. All meta-analyses will be performed using Review Manager software. The quality of the studies will be evaluated using the guidelines listed in the Cochrane Handbook. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statements will be followed until the findings of the systematic review and meta-analysis are reported. RESULTS: The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. CONCLUSION: Our study will draw an objective conclusion of the comparisons between ERAS and conventional care in aspects of perioperative outcomes and provide level I evidences for clinical decision makings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5842024
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58420242018-03-13 Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs for esophagectomy protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis Liu, Feiyu Wang, Wei Wang, Chengde Peng, Xiaonu Medicine (Baltimore) 7100 BACKGROUND: Esophageal cancer is one of the worst malignant digestive neoplasms with poor treatment outcomes. Esophagectomy plays an important role and offers a potential curable chance to these patients. However, esophagectomy with radical lymphadenectomy is known as one of the most invasive digestive surgeries which are associated with high morbidity and mortality. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol is a patient-centered, surgeon-led system combining anesthesia, nursing, nutrition, and psychology, which is designed for reducing complications, promoting recovery, and improving treatment outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis is aiming at how beneficial, and to what extent ERAS really will be. METHODS: A systematic literature search will be performed through January 2018 using MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar for relevant articles published in any language. Randomized controlled trials, prospective cohort studies, and propensity-matched comparative studies will be included. All meta-analyses will be performed using Review Manager software. The quality of the studies will be evaluated using the guidelines listed in the Cochrane Handbook. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statements will be followed until the findings of the systematic review and meta-analysis are reported. RESULTS: The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. CONCLUSION: Our study will draw an objective conclusion of the comparisons between ERAS and conventional care in aspects of perioperative outcomes and provide level I evidences for clinical decision makings. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5842024/ /pubmed/29465538 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010016 Text en Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle 7100
Liu, Feiyu
Wang, Wei
Wang, Chengde
Peng, Xiaonu
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs for esophagectomy protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs for esophagectomy protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs for esophagectomy protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs for esophagectomy protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs for esophagectomy protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs for esophagectomy protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort enhanced recovery after surgery (eras) programs for esophagectomy protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic 7100
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5842024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29465538
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010016
work_keys_str_mv AT liufeiyu enhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasprogramsforesophagectomyprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangwei enhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasprogramsforesophagectomyprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangchengde enhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasprogramsforesophagectomyprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT pengxiaonu enhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasprogramsforesophagectomyprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis