Cargando…
How does the femoral cortex depend on bone shape? A methodology for the joint analysis of surface texture and shape
In humans, there is clear evidence of an association between hip fracture risk and femoral neck bone mineral density, and some evidence of an association between fracture risk and the shape of the proximal femur. Here, we investigate whether the femoral cortex plays a role in these associations: do...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5842044/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29414436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2018.01.001 |
_version_ | 1783304847017115648 |
---|---|
author | Gee, A.H. Treece, G.M. Poole, K.E.S. |
author_facet | Gee, A.H. Treece, G.M. Poole, K.E.S. |
author_sort | Gee, A.H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In humans, there is clear evidence of an association between hip fracture risk and femoral neck bone mineral density, and some evidence of an association between fracture risk and the shape of the proximal femur. Here, we investigate whether the femoral cortex plays a role in these associations: do particular morphologies predispose to weaker cortices? To answer this question, we used cortical bone mapping to measure the distribution of cortical mass surface density (CMSD, mg/cm(2)) in a cohort of 125 females. Principal component analysis of the femoral surfaces identified three modes of shape variation accounting for 65% of the population variance. We then used statistical parametric mapping (SPM) to locate regions of the cortex where CMSD depends on shape, allowing for age. Our principal findings were increased CMSD with increased gracility over much of the proximal femur; and decreased CMSD at the superior femoral neck, coupled with increased CMSD at the calcar femorale, with increasing neck-shaft angle. In obtaining these results, we studied the role of spatial normalization in SPM, identifying systematic misregistration as a major impediment to the joint analysis of CMSD and shape. Through a series of experiments on synthetic data, we evaluated a number of registration methods for spatial normalization, concluding that only those predicated on an explicit set of homologous landmarks are suitable for this kind of analysis. The emergent methodology amounts to an extension of Geometric Morphometric Image Analysis to the domain of textured surfaces, alongside a protocol for labelling homologous landmarks in clinical CT scans of the human proximal femur. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5842044 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58420442018-04-01 How does the femoral cortex depend on bone shape? A methodology for the joint analysis of surface texture and shape Gee, A.H. Treece, G.M. Poole, K.E.S. Med Image Anal Article In humans, there is clear evidence of an association between hip fracture risk and femoral neck bone mineral density, and some evidence of an association between fracture risk and the shape of the proximal femur. Here, we investigate whether the femoral cortex plays a role in these associations: do particular morphologies predispose to weaker cortices? To answer this question, we used cortical bone mapping to measure the distribution of cortical mass surface density (CMSD, mg/cm(2)) in a cohort of 125 females. Principal component analysis of the femoral surfaces identified three modes of shape variation accounting for 65% of the population variance. We then used statistical parametric mapping (SPM) to locate regions of the cortex where CMSD depends on shape, allowing for age. Our principal findings were increased CMSD with increased gracility over much of the proximal femur; and decreased CMSD at the superior femoral neck, coupled with increased CMSD at the calcar femorale, with increasing neck-shaft angle. In obtaining these results, we studied the role of spatial normalization in SPM, identifying systematic misregistration as a major impediment to the joint analysis of CMSD and shape. Through a series of experiments on synthetic data, we evaluated a number of registration methods for spatial normalization, concluding that only those predicated on an explicit set of homologous landmarks are suitable for this kind of analysis. The emergent methodology amounts to an extension of Geometric Morphometric Image Analysis to the domain of textured surfaces, alongside a protocol for labelling homologous landmarks in clinical CT scans of the human proximal femur. Elsevier 2018-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5842044/ /pubmed/29414436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2018.01.001 Text en © 2018 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Gee, A.H. Treece, G.M. Poole, K.E.S. How does the femoral cortex depend on bone shape? A methodology for the joint analysis of surface texture and shape |
title | How does the femoral cortex depend on bone shape? A methodology for the joint analysis of surface texture and shape |
title_full | How does the femoral cortex depend on bone shape? A methodology for the joint analysis of surface texture and shape |
title_fullStr | How does the femoral cortex depend on bone shape? A methodology for the joint analysis of surface texture and shape |
title_full_unstemmed | How does the femoral cortex depend on bone shape? A methodology for the joint analysis of surface texture and shape |
title_short | How does the femoral cortex depend on bone shape? A methodology for the joint analysis of surface texture and shape |
title_sort | how does the femoral cortex depend on bone shape? a methodology for the joint analysis of surface texture and shape |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5842044/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29414436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2018.01.001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT geeah howdoesthefemoralcortexdependonboneshapeamethodologyforthejointanalysisofsurfacetextureandshape AT treecegm howdoesthefemoralcortexdependonboneshapeamethodologyforthejointanalysisofsurfacetextureandshape AT poolekes howdoesthefemoralcortexdependonboneshapeamethodologyforthejointanalysisofsurfacetextureandshape |