Cargando…
A comparison of pain control and complications using three different ways of anesthesia in patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy
BACKGROUND: We aim to compare the degree of pain control and complications in three types of anesthesia using periprostatic nerve block (PPNB) plus intrarectal local anesthesia (IRLA), low-dose spinal anesthesia, and intravenous (IV) sedation in patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guid...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5842442/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29531569 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jrms.JRMS_639_17 |
_version_ | 1783304893301260288 |
---|---|
author | Mazdak, Hamid Abtahi, Amir Mohamad Momeni, Fatemeh Izadpanahi, Mohammad Hossein |
author_facet | Mazdak, Hamid Abtahi, Amir Mohamad Momeni, Fatemeh Izadpanahi, Mohammad Hossein |
author_sort | Mazdak, Hamid |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We aim to compare the degree of pain control and complications in three types of anesthesia using periprostatic nerve block (PPNB) plus intrarectal local anesthesia (IRLA), low-dose spinal anesthesia, and intravenous (IV) sedation in patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this clinical trial study, 106 patients were participated from December 2015 to December 2016 at Alzahra Hospital, Isfahan, Iran. Patients were randomly allocated into three groups to receive PPNB plus IRLA (n = 36), low-dose spinal anesthesia (n = 35) and IV sedation (n = 35) before TRUS-guided prostate biopsy. Pain scores were recorded using a 10 point visual analog scale right after the biopsy was done. Early and late complications were assessed using a questionnaire after the procedure and in follow-up of patients. RESULTS: Overall, the pain score in the low-dose spinal anesthesia group was significantly lower than PPNB plus IRLA and IV sedation groups (P < 0.001). The differences in pain scores between PPNB plus IRLA group and IV sedation group were not significant (P = 0.30). Urinary retraction and fever were significantly more frequent in low-dose spinal anesthesia and IV sedation, retrospectively (P = 0.04, P = 0.03). No significant difference in late complications was found among the groups. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that low-dose spinal anesthesia is superior to PPNB plus IRLA and IV sedation in terms of pain controlling and was associated with higher tolerance of the examination and patient comfort. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5842442 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58424422018-03-12 A comparison of pain control and complications using three different ways of anesthesia in patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy Mazdak, Hamid Abtahi, Amir Mohamad Momeni, Fatemeh Izadpanahi, Mohammad Hossein J Res Med Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: We aim to compare the degree of pain control and complications in three types of anesthesia using periprostatic nerve block (PPNB) plus intrarectal local anesthesia (IRLA), low-dose spinal anesthesia, and intravenous (IV) sedation in patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this clinical trial study, 106 patients were participated from December 2015 to December 2016 at Alzahra Hospital, Isfahan, Iran. Patients were randomly allocated into three groups to receive PPNB plus IRLA (n = 36), low-dose spinal anesthesia (n = 35) and IV sedation (n = 35) before TRUS-guided prostate biopsy. Pain scores were recorded using a 10 point visual analog scale right after the biopsy was done. Early and late complications were assessed using a questionnaire after the procedure and in follow-up of patients. RESULTS: Overall, the pain score in the low-dose spinal anesthesia group was significantly lower than PPNB plus IRLA and IV sedation groups (P < 0.001). The differences in pain scores between PPNB plus IRLA group and IV sedation group were not significant (P = 0.30). Urinary retraction and fever were significantly more frequent in low-dose spinal anesthesia and IV sedation, retrospectively (P = 0.04, P = 0.03). No significant difference in late complications was found among the groups. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that low-dose spinal anesthesia is superior to PPNB plus IRLA and IV sedation in terms of pain controlling and was associated with higher tolerance of the examination and patient comfort. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5842442/ /pubmed/29531569 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jrms.JRMS_639_17 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Journal of Research in Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Mazdak, Hamid Abtahi, Amir Mohamad Momeni, Fatemeh Izadpanahi, Mohammad Hossein A comparison of pain control and complications using three different ways of anesthesia in patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy |
title | A comparison of pain control and complications using three different ways of anesthesia in patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy |
title_full | A comparison of pain control and complications using three different ways of anesthesia in patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy |
title_fullStr | A comparison of pain control and complications using three different ways of anesthesia in patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of pain control and complications using three different ways of anesthesia in patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy |
title_short | A comparison of pain control and complications using three different ways of anesthesia in patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy |
title_sort | comparison of pain control and complications using three different ways of anesthesia in patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5842442/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29531569 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jrms.JRMS_639_17 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mazdakhamid acomparisonofpaincontrolandcomplicationsusingthreedifferentwaysofanesthesiainpatientsundergoingtransrectalultrasoundguidedprostatebiopsy AT abtahiamirmohamad acomparisonofpaincontrolandcomplicationsusingthreedifferentwaysofanesthesiainpatientsundergoingtransrectalultrasoundguidedprostatebiopsy AT momenifatemeh acomparisonofpaincontrolandcomplicationsusingthreedifferentwaysofanesthesiainpatientsundergoingtransrectalultrasoundguidedprostatebiopsy AT izadpanahimohammadhossein acomparisonofpaincontrolandcomplicationsusingthreedifferentwaysofanesthesiainpatientsundergoingtransrectalultrasoundguidedprostatebiopsy AT mazdakhamid comparisonofpaincontrolandcomplicationsusingthreedifferentwaysofanesthesiainpatientsundergoingtransrectalultrasoundguidedprostatebiopsy AT abtahiamirmohamad comparisonofpaincontrolandcomplicationsusingthreedifferentwaysofanesthesiainpatientsundergoingtransrectalultrasoundguidedprostatebiopsy AT momenifatemeh comparisonofpaincontrolandcomplicationsusingthreedifferentwaysofanesthesiainpatientsundergoingtransrectalultrasoundguidedprostatebiopsy AT izadpanahimohammadhossein comparisonofpaincontrolandcomplicationsusingthreedifferentwaysofanesthesiainpatientsundergoingtransrectalultrasoundguidedprostatebiopsy |