Cargando…

The Tolerability and Efficacy of Oral Isotonic Solution versus Plain Water in Dengue Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND: Plasma leakage plays an important role in dengue infection, and this condition can lead to hemoconcentration, hypovolemia, and shock. Fluid replacement is the main treatment for dengue. There is a lack of evidence to support certain oral fluid therapy as a treatment for dengue patients....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nainggolan, Leonard, Bardosono, Saptawati, Ibrahim Ilyas, Ermita I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5842470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29531435
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijcm.IJCM_377_16
_version_ 1783304900127490048
author Nainggolan, Leonard
Bardosono, Saptawati
Ibrahim Ilyas, Ermita I.
author_facet Nainggolan, Leonard
Bardosono, Saptawati
Ibrahim Ilyas, Ermita I.
author_sort Nainggolan, Leonard
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Plasma leakage plays an important role in dengue infection, and this condition can lead to hemoconcentration, hypovolemia, and shock. Fluid replacement is the main treatment for dengue. There is a lack of evidence to support certain oral fluid therapy as a treatment for dengue patients. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to evaluate tolerability and efficacy of oral isotonic solution (OIS) compared to plain water as a fluid replacement in dengue patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized, clinical trial with single-blinded groups was conducted to compare tolerability and efficacy of OIS and plain water in dengue patients. We evaluated gastrointestinal disturbances (nausea, vomiting, and bloating), body temperature, mean arterial pressure (MAP), fluid balance, hematocrit, Na(+), and K(+) levels. Data were analyzed with SPSS 20.0, and figures were made with GraphPad Prism version 5.01. RESULTS: Twenty four subjects were included and divided equally into two groups. Our results showed that there are no significant differences but indicate several noteworthy trends. The intervention group (OIS) experienced less nausea, less vomiting, had positive fluid balance and higher MAP, and became afebrile faster compared to the control group (plain water). CONCLUSION: Although not statistically significant, this study shows the trend that OIS is well-tolerated and effective for dengue patients compared to plain water.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5842470
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58424702018-03-12 The Tolerability and Efficacy of Oral Isotonic Solution versus Plain Water in Dengue Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial Nainggolan, Leonard Bardosono, Saptawati Ibrahim Ilyas, Ermita I. Indian J Community Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Plasma leakage plays an important role in dengue infection, and this condition can lead to hemoconcentration, hypovolemia, and shock. Fluid replacement is the main treatment for dengue. There is a lack of evidence to support certain oral fluid therapy as a treatment for dengue patients. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to evaluate tolerability and efficacy of oral isotonic solution (OIS) compared to plain water as a fluid replacement in dengue patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized, clinical trial with single-blinded groups was conducted to compare tolerability and efficacy of OIS and plain water in dengue patients. We evaluated gastrointestinal disturbances (nausea, vomiting, and bloating), body temperature, mean arterial pressure (MAP), fluid balance, hematocrit, Na(+), and K(+) levels. Data were analyzed with SPSS 20.0, and figures were made with GraphPad Prism version 5.01. RESULTS: Twenty four subjects were included and divided equally into two groups. Our results showed that there are no significant differences but indicate several noteworthy trends. The intervention group (OIS) experienced less nausea, less vomiting, had positive fluid balance and higher MAP, and became afebrile faster compared to the control group (plain water). CONCLUSION: Although not statistically significant, this study shows the trend that OIS is well-tolerated and effective for dengue patients compared to plain water. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5842470/ /pubmed/29531435 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijcm.IJCM_377_16 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Indian Journal of Community Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Nainggolan, Leonard
Bardosono, Saptawati
Ibrahim Ilyas, Ermita I.
The Tolerability and Efficacy of Oral Isotonic Solution versus Plain Water in Dengue Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title The Tolerability and Efficacy of Oral Isotonic Solution versus Plain Water in Dengue Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full The Tolerability and Efficacy of Oral Isotonic Solution versus Plain Water in Dengue Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_fullStr The Tolerability and Efficacy of Oral Isotonic Solution versus Plain Water in Dengue Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed The Tolerability and Efficacy of Oral Isotonic Solution versus Plain Water in Dengue Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_short The Tolerability and Efficacy of Oral Isotonic Solution versus Plain Water in Dengue Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_sort tolerability and efficacy of oral isotonic solution versus plain water in dengue patients: a randomized clinical trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5842470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29531435
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijcm.IJCM_377_16
work_keys_str_mv AT nainggolanleonard thetolerabilityandefficacyoforalisotonicsolutionversusplainwaterindenguepatientsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT bardosonosaptawati thetolerabilityandefficacyoforalisotonicsolutionversusplainwaterindenguepatientsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT ibrahimilyasermitai thetolerabilityandefficacyoforalisotonicsolutionversusplainwaterindenguepatientsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT nainggolanleonard tolerabilityandefficacyoforalisotonicsolutionversusplainwaterindenguepatientsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT bardosonosaptawati tolerabilityandefficacyoforalisotonicsolutionversusplainwaterindenguepatientsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT ibrahimilyasermitai tolerabilityandefficacyoforalisotonicsolutionversusplainwaterindenguepatientsarandomizedclinicaltrial