Cargando…

Palliative care in the home: a scoping review of study quality, primary outcomes, and thematic component analysis

BACKGROUND: The aim of palliative care is to improve the quality of life of patients and families through the prevention and relief of suffering. Frequently, patients may choose to receive palliative care in the home. The objective of this paper is to summarize the quality and primary outcomes measu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hofmeister, Mark, Memedovich, Ally, Dowsett, Laura E., Sevick, Laura, McCarron, Tamara, Spackman, Eldon, Stafinski, Tania, Menon, Devidas, Noseworthy, Tom, Clement, Fiona
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5842572/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29514620
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-018-0299-z
_version_ 1783304924773220352
author Hofmeister, Mark
Memedovich, Ally
Dowsett, Laura E.
Sevick, Laura
McCarron, Tamara
Spackman, Eldon
Stafinski, Tania
Menon, Devidas
Noseworthy, Tom
Clement, Fiona
author_facet Hofmeister, Mark
Memedovich, Ally
Dowsett, Laura E.
Sevick, Laura
McCarron, Tamara
Spackman, Eldon
Stafinski, Tania
Menon, Devidas
Noseworthy, Tom
Clement, Fiona
author_sort Hofmeister, Mark
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of palliative care is to improve the quality of life of patients and families through the prevention and relief of suffering. Frequently, patients may choose to receive palliative care in the home. The objective of this paper is to summarize the quality and primary outcomes measured within the palliative care in the home literature. This will synthesize the current state of the literature and inform future work. METHODS: A scoping review was completed using PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, EconLit, PsycINFO, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, and National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database were searched from inception to August 2016. Inclusion criteria included: 1) care was provided in the “home of the patient” as defined by the study, 2) outcomes were reported, and 3) reported original data. Thematic component analysis was completed to categorize interventions. RESULTS: Fifty-three studies formed the final data set. The literature varied extensively. Five themes were identified: accessibility of healthcare, caregiver support, individualized patient centered care, multidisciplinary care provision, and quality improvement. Primary outcomes were resource use, symptom burden, quality of life, satisfaction, caregiver distress, place of death, cost analysis, or described experiences. The majority of studies were of moderate or unclear quality. CONCLUSIONS: There is robust literature of varying quality, assessing different components of palliative care in the home interventions, and measuring different outcomes. To be meaningful to patients, these interventions need to be consistently evaluated with outcomes that matter to patients. Future research could focus on reaching a consensus for outcomes to evaluate palliative care in the home interventions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12904-018-0299-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5842572
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58425722018-03-14 Palliative care in the home: a scoping review of study quality, primary outcomes, and thematic component analysis Hofmeister, Mark Memedovich, Ally Dowsett, Laura E. Sevick, Laura McCarron, Tamara Spackman, Eldon Stafinski, Tania Menon, Devidas Noseworthy, Tom Clement, Fiona BMC Palliat Care Research Article BACKGROUND: The aim of palliative care is to improve the quality of life of patients and families through the prevention and relief of suffering. Frequently, patients may choose to receive palliative care in the home. The objective of this paper is to summarize the quality and primary outcomes measured within the palliative care in the home literature. This will synthesize the current state of the literature and inform future work. METHODS: A scoping review was completed using PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, EconLit, PsycINFO, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, and National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database were searched from inception to August 2016. Inclusion criteria included: 1) care was provided in the “home of the patient” as defined by the study, 2) outcomes were reported, and 3) reported original data. Thematic component analysis was completed to categorize interventions. RESULTS: Fifty-three studies formed the final data set. The literature varied extensively. Five themes were identified: accessibility of healthcare, caregiver support, individualized patient centered care, multidisciplinary care provision, and quality improvement. Primary outcomes were resource use, symptom burden, quality of life, satisfaction, caregiver distress, place of death, cost analysis, or described experiences. The majority of studies were of moderate or unclear quality. CONCLUSIONS: There is robust literature of varying quality, assessing different components of palliative care in the home interventions, and measuring different outcomes. To be meaningful to patients, these interventions need to be consistently evaluated with outcomes that matter to patients. Future research could focus on reaching a consensus for outcomes to evaluate palliative care in the home interventions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12904-018-0299-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5842572/ /pubmed/29514620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-018-0299-z Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hofmeister, Mark
Memedovich, Ally
Dowsett, Laura E.
Sevick, Laura
McCarron, Tamara
Spackman, Eldon
Stafinski, Tania
Menon, Devidas
Noseworthy, Tom
Clement, Fiona
Palliative care in the home: a scoping review of study quality, primary outcomes, and thematic component analysis
title Palliative care in the home: a scoping review of study quality, primary outcomes, and thematic component analysis
title_full Palliative care in the home: a scoping review of study quality, primary outcomes, and thematic component analysis
title_fullStr Palliative care in the home: a scoping review of study quality, primary outcomes, and thematic component analysis
title_full_unstemmed Palliative care in the home: a scoping review of study quality, primary outcomes, and thematic component analysis
title_short Palliative care in the home: a scoping review of study quality, primary outcomes, and thematic component analysis
title_sort palliative care in the home: a scoping review of study quality, primary outcomes, and thematic component analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5842572/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29514620
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-018-0299-z
work_keys_str_mv AT hofmeistermark palliativecareinthehomeascopingreviewofstudyqualityprimaryoutcomesandthematiccomponentanalysis
AT memedovichally palliativecareinthehomeascopingreviewofstudyqualityprimaryoutcomesandthematiccomponentanalysis
AT dowsettlaurae palliativecareinthehomeascopingreviewofstudyqualityprimaryoutcomesandthematiccomponentanalysis
AT sevicklaura palliativecareinthehomeascopingreviewofstudyqualityprimaryoutcomesandthematiccomponentanalysis
AT mccarrontamara palliativecareinthehomeascopingreviewofstudyqualityprimaryoutcomesandthematiccomponentanalysis
AT spackmaneldon palliativecareinthehomeascopingreviewofstudyqualityprimaryoutcomesandthematiccomponentanalysis
AT stafinskitania palliativecareinthehomeascopingreviewofstudyqualityprimaryoutcomesandthematiccomponentanalysis
AT menondevidas palliativecareinthehomeascopingreviewofstudyqualityprimaryoutcomesandthematiccomponentanalysis
AT noseworthytom palliativecareinthehomeascopingreviewofstudyqualityprimaryoutcomesandthematiccomponentanalysis
AT clementfiona palliativecareinthehomeascopingreviewofstudyqualityprimaryoutcomesandthematiccomponentanalysis