Cargando…
Palliative care in the home: a scoping review of study quality, primary outcomes, and thematic component analysis
BACKGROUND: The aim of palliative care is to improve the quality of life of patients and families through the prevention and relief of suffering. Frequently, patients may choose to receive palliative care in the home. The objective of this paper is to summarize the quality and primary outcomes measu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5842572/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29514620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-018-0299-z |
_version_ | 1783304924773220352 |
---|---|
author | Hofmeister, Mark Memedovich, Ally Dowsett, Laura E. Sevick, Laura McCarron, Tamara Spackman, Eldon Stafinski, Tania Menon, Devidas Noseworthy, Tom Clement, Fiona |
author_facet | Hofmeister, Mark Memedovich, Ally Dowsett, Laura E. Sevick, Laura McCarron, Tamara Spackman, Eldon Stafinski, Tania Menon, Devidas Noseworthy, Tom Clement, Fiona |
author_sort | Hofmeister, Mark |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of palliative care is to improve the quality of life of patients and families through the prevention and relief of suffering. Frequently, patients may choose to receive palliative care in the home. The objective of this paper is to summarize the quality and primary outcomes measured within the palliative care in the home literature. This will synthesize the current state of the literature and inform future work. METHODS: A scoping review was completed using PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, EconLit, PsycINFO, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, and National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database were searched from inception to August 2016. Inclusion criteria included: 1) care was provided in the “home of the patient” as defined by the study, 2) outcomes were reported, and 3) reported original data. Thematic component analysis was completed to categorize interventions. RESULTS: Fifty-three studies formed the final data set. The literature varied extensively. Five themes were identified: accessibility of healthcare, caregiver support, individualized patient centered care, multidisciplinary care provision, and quality improvement. Primary outcomes were resource use, symptom burden, quality of life, satisfaction, caregiver distress, place of death, cost analysis, or described experiences. The majority of studies were of moderate or unclear quality. CONCLUSIONS: There is robust literature of varying quality, assessing different components of palliative care in the home interventions, and measuring different outcomes. To be meaningful to patients, these interventions need to be consistently evaluated with outcomes that matter to patients. Future research could focus on reaching a consensus for outcomes to evaluate palliative care in the home interventions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12904-018-0299-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5842572 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58425722018-03-14 Palliative care in the home: a scoping review of study quality, primary outcomes, and thematic component analysis Hofmeister, Mark Memedovich, Ally Dowsett, Laura E. Sevick, Laura McCarron, Tamara Spackman, Eldon Stafinski, Tania Menon, Devidas Noseworthy, Tom Clement, Fiona BMC Palliat Care Research Article BACKGROUND: The aim of palliative care is to improve the quality of life of patients and families through the prevention and relief of suffering. Frequently, patients may choose to receive palliative care in the home. The objective of this paper is to summarize the quality and primary outcomes measured within the palliative care in the home literature. This will synthesize the current state of the literature and inform future work. METHODS: A scoping review was completed using PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, EconLit, PsycINFO, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, and National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database were searched from inception to August 2016. Inclusion criteria included: 1) care was provided in the “home of the patient” as defined by the study, 2) outcomes were reported, and 3) reported original data. Thematic component analysis was completed to categorize interventions. RESULTS: Fifty-three studies formed the final data set. The literature varied extensively. Five themes were identified: accessibility of healthcare, caregiver support, individualized patient centered care, multidisciplinary care provision, and quality improvement. Primary outcomes were resource use, symptom burden, quality of life, satisfaction, caregiver distress, place of death, cost analysis, or described experiences. The majority of studies were of moderate or unclear quality. CONCLUSIONS: There is robust literature of varying quality, assessing different components of palliative care in the home interventions, and measuring different outcomes. To be meaningful to patients, these interventions need to be consistently evaluated with outcomes that matter to patients. Future research could focus on reaching a consensus for outcomes to evaluate palliative care in the home interventions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12904-018-0299-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5842572/ /pubmed/29514620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-018-0299-z Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hofmeister, Mark Memedovich, Ally Dowsett, Laura E. Sevick, Laura McCarron, Tamara Spackman, Eldon Stafinski, Tania Menon, Devidas Noseworthy, Tom Clement, Fiona Palliative care in the home: a scoping review of study quality, primary outcomes, and thematic component analysis |
title | Palliative care in the home: a scoping review of study quality, primary outcomes, and thematic component analysis |
title_full | Palliative care in the home: a scoping review of study quality, primary outcomes, and thematic component analysis |
title_fullStr | Palliative care in the home: a scoping review of study quality, primary outcomes, and thematic component analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Palliative care in the home: a scoping review of study quality, primary outcomes, and thematic component analysis |
title_short | Palliative care in the home: a scoping review of study quality, primary outcomes, and thematic component analysis |
title_sort | palliative care in the home: a scoping review of study quality, primary outcomes, and thematic component analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5842572/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29514620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-018-0299-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hofmeistermark palliativecareinthehomeascopingreviewofstudyqualityprimaryoutcomesandthematiccomponentanalysis AT memedovichally palliativecareinthehomeascopingreviewofstudyqualityprimaryoutcomesandthematiccomponentanalysis AT dowsettlaurae palliativecareinthehomeascopingreviewofstudyqualityprimaryoutcomesandthematiccomponentanalysis AT sevicklaura palliativecareinthehomeascopingreviewofstudyqualityprimaryoutcomesandthematiccomponentanalysis AT mccarrontamara palliativecareinthehomeascopingreviewofstudyqualityprimaryoutcomesandthematiccomponentanalysis AT spackmaneldon palliativecareinthehomeascopingreviewofstudyqualityprimaryoutcomesandthematiccomponentanalysis AT stafinskitania palliativecareinthehomeascopingreviewofstudyqualityprimaryoutcomesandthematiccomponentanalysis AT menondevidas palliativecareinthehomeascopingreviewofstudyqualityprimaryoutcomesandthematiccomponentanalysis AT noseworthytom palliativecareinthehomeascopingreviewofstudyqualityprimaryoutcomesandthematiccomponentanalysis AT clementfiona palliativecareinthehomeascopingreviewofstudyqualityprimaryoutcomesandthematiccomponentanalysis |