Cargando…
Hypoxia imaging with (18)F-FAZA PET/CT predicts radiotherapy response in esophageal adenocarcinoma xenografts
BACKGROUND: Esophageal cancer is an aggressive disease with poor survival rates. A more patient-tailored approach based on predictive biomarkers could improve outcome. We aimed to predict radiotherapy (RT) response by imaging tumor hypoxia with (18)F-FAZA PET/CT in an esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5842657/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29514673 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-0984-3 |
_version_ | 1783304945390321664 |
---|---|
author | Melsens, Elodie De Vlieghere, Elly Descamps, Benedicte Vanhove, Christian Kersemans, Ken De Vos, Filip Goethals, Ingeborg Brans, Boudewijn De Wever, Olivier Ceelen, Wim Pattyn, Piet |
author_facet | Melsens, Elodie De Vlieghere, Elly Descamps, Benedicte Vanhove, Christian Kersemans, Ken De Vos, Filip Goethals, Ingeborg Brans, Boudewijn De Wever, Olivier Ceelen, Wim Pattyn, Piet |
author_sort | Melsens, Elodie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Esophageal cancer is an aggressive disease with poor survival rates. A more patient-tailored approach based on predictive biomarkers could improve outcome. We aimed to predict radiotherapy (RT) response by imaging tumor hypoxia with (18)F-FAZA PET/CT in an esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) mouse model. Additionally, we investigated the radiosensitizing effect of the hypoxia modifier nimorazole in vitro and in vivo. METHODS: In vitro MTS cell proliferation assays (OACM5 1.C SC1, human EAC cell line) were performed under normoxic and hypoxic (< 1%) conditions: control (100 μL PBS), nimorazole, irradiation (5, 10 or 20 Gy) with or without nimorazole. In vivo, subcutaneous xenografts were induced in nude mice (OACM5 1.C SC1). Treatment was given daily for 5 consecutive days: (A) control (600 μl NaCl 0.9% intraperitoneally (IP)) (N = 5, n = 7), (B) RT (5 Gy/d) (N = 11, n = 20), (C) combination (nimorazole (200 mg/kg/d IP) 30 min before RT) (N = 13, n = 21). N = number of mice, n = number of tumors. (18)F-FAZA PET/CT was performed before treatment and tumor to background (T/B) ratios were calculated. Relative tumor growth was calculated and tumor sections were examined histologically (hypoxia, proliferation). RESULTS: A T/B ≥ 3.59 on pre-treatment (18)F-FAZA PET/CT was predictive for worse RT response (sensitivity 92.3%, specificity 71.4%). Radiation was less effective in hypoxic tumors (T/B ≥ 3.59) compared to normoxic tumors (T/B < 3.59) (P = 0.0025). In vitro, pre-treatment with nimorazole significantly decreased hypoxic radioresistance (P < 0.01) while in vivo, nimorazole enhanced the efficacy of RT to suppress cancer cell proliferation in hypoxic tumor areas (Ki67, P = 0.064), but did not affect macroscopic tumor growth. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor tissue hypoxia as measured with (18)F-FAZA PET/CT is predictive for RT response in an EAC xenograft model. The radiosensitizing effect of nimorazole was questionable and requires further investigation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13014-018-0984-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5842657 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58426572018-03-14 Hypoxia imaging with (18)F-FAZA PET/CT predicts radiotherapy response in esophageal adenocarcinoma xenografts Melsens, Elodie De Vlieghere, Elly Descamps, Benedicte Vanhove, Christian Kersemans, Ken De Vos, Filip Goethals, Ingeborg Brans, Boudewijn De Wever, Olivier Ceelen, Wim Pattyn, Piet Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Esophageal cancer is an aggressive disease with poor survival rates. A more patient-tailored approach based on predictive biomarkers could improve outcome. We aimed to predict radiotherapy (RT) response by imaging tumor hypoxia with (18)F-FAZA PET/CT in an esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) mouse model. Additionally, we investigated the radiosensitizing effect of the hypoxia modifier nimorazole in vitro and in vivo. METHODS: In vitro MTS cell proliferation assays (OACM5 1.C SC1, human EAC cell line) were performed under normoxic and hypoxic (< 1%) conditions: control (100 μL PBS), nimorazole, irradiation (5, 10 or 20 Gy) with or without nimorazole. In vivo, subcutaneous xenografts were induced in nude mice (OACM5 1.C SC1). Treatment was given daily for 5 consecutive days: (A) control (600 μl NaCl 0.9% intraperitoneally (IP)) (N = 5, n = 7), (B) RT (5 Gy/d) (N = 11, n = 20), (C) combination (nimorazole (200 mg/kg/d IP) 30 min before RT) (N = 13, n = 21). N = number of mice, n = number of tumors. (18)F-FAZA PET/CT was performed before treatment and tumor to background (T/B) ratios were calculated. Relative tumor growth was calculated and tumor sections were examined histologically (hypoxia, proliferation). RESULTS: A T/B ≥ 3.59 on pre-treatment (18)F-FAZA PET/CT was predictive for worse RT response (sensitivity 92.3%, specificity 71.4%). Radiation was less effective in hypoxic tumors (T/B ≥ 3.59) compared to normoxic tumors (T/B < 3.59) (P = 0.0025). In vitro, pre-treatment with nimorazole significantly decreased hypoxic radioresistance (P < 0.01) while in vivo, nimorazole enhanced the efficacy of RT to suppress cancer cell proliferation in hypoxic tumor areas (Ki67, P = 0.064), but did not affect macroscopic tumor growth. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor tissue hypoxia as measured with (18)F-FAZA PET/CT is predictive for RT response in an EAC xenograft model. The radiosensitizing effect of nimorazole was questionable and requires further investigation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13014-018-0984-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5842657/ /pubmed/29514673 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-0984-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Melsens, Elodie De Vlieghere, Elly Descamps, Benedicte Vanhove, Christian Kersemans, Ken De Vos, Filip Goethals, Ingeborg Brans, Boudewijn De Wever, Olivier Ceelen, Wim Pattyn, Piet Hypoxia imaging with (18)F-FAZA PET/CT predicts radiotherapy response in esophageal adenocarcinoma xenografts |
title | Hypoxia imaging with (18)F-FAZA PET/CT predicts radiotherapy response in esophageal adenocarcinoma xenografts |
title_full | Hypoxia imaging with (18)F-FAZA PET/CT predicts radiotherapy response in esophageal adenocarcinoma xenografts |
title_fullStr | Hypoxia imaging with (18)F-FAZA PET/CT predicts radiotherapy response in esophageal adenocarcinoma xenografts |
title_full_unstemmed | Hypoxia imaging with (18)F-FAZA PET/CT predicts radiotherapy response in esophageal adenocarcinoma xenografts |
title_short | Hypoxia imaging with (18)F-FAZA PET/CT predicts radiotherapy response in esophageal adenocarcinoma xenografts |
title_sort | hypoxia imaging with (18)f-faza pet/ct predicts radiotherapy response in esophageal adenocarcinoma xenografts |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5842657/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29514673 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-0984-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT melsenselodie hypoxiaimagingwith18ffazapetctpredictsradiotherapyresponseinesophagealadenocarcinomaxenografts AT devlieghereelly hypoxiaimagingwith18ffazapetctpredictsradiotherapyresponseinesophagealadenocarcinomaxenografts AT descampsbenedicte hypoxiaimagingwith18ffazapetctpredictsradiotherapyresponseinesophagealadenocarcinomaxenografts AT vanhovechristian hypoxiaimagingwith18ffazapetctpredictsradiotherapyresponseinesophagealadenocarcinomaxenografts AT kersemansken hypoxiaimagingwith18ffazapetctpredictsradiotherapyresponseinesophagealadenocarcinomaxenografts AT devosfilip hypoxiaimagingwith18ffazapetctpredictsradiotherapyresponseinesophagealadenocarcinomaxenografts AT goethalsingeborg hypoxiaimagingwith18ffazapetctpredictsradiotherapyresponseinesophagealadenocarcinomaxenografts AT bransboudewijn hypoxiaimagingwith18ffazapetctpredictsradiotherapyresponseinesophagealadenocarcinomaxenografts AT deweverolivier hypoxiaimagingwith18ffazapetctpredictsradiotherapyresponseinesophagealadenocarcinomaxenografts AT ceelenwim hypoxiaimagingwith18ffazapetctpredictsradiotherapyresponseinesophagealadenocarcinomaxenografts AT pattynpiet hypoxiaimagingwith18ffazapetctpredictsradiotherapyresponseinesophagealadenocarcinomaxenografts |