Cargando…

Peri-implant health, clinical outcome and patient-centred outcomes of implant-supported overdentures in the mandible and the maxilla

OBJECTIVES/AIMS: The primary aim of this retrospective pilot study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of overdentures on four non-splinted maxillary implants compared to the mandible using locator attachments and secondly to assess patient's opinion of the treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Offord, David, Mathieson, Grant, Kingsford, Nicola, Matthys, Carine, Glibert, Maarten, De Bruyn, Hugo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5842836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29607087
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bdjopen.2017.17
_version_ 1783304973937803264
author Offord, David
Mathieson, Grant
Kingsford, Nicola
Matthys, Carine
Glibert, Maarten
De Bruyn, Hugo
author_facet Offord, David
Mathieson, Grant
Kingsford, Nicola
Matthys, Carine
Glibert, Maarten
De Bruyn, Hugo
author_sort Offord, David
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES/AIMS: The primary aim of this retrospective pilot study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of overdentures on four non-splinted maxillary implants compared to the mandible using locator attachments and secondly to assess patient's opinion of the treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The treatment protocol used here is summarised as a single-stage surgical approach followed by immediate loading (same day in 12 of 17 patients) of a removable prosthesis in the maxilla and mandible. Most of the implants were installed into fresh extraction sockets. Clinical outcomes were evaluated in 68 southern implants, straight (non co-axis) or angulated (co-axis) in 17 patients. Patients were examined by independent examiners at an average follow-up of 14.5 months after implant placement. RESULTS: Outcomes measured were implant survival, bone loss, bleeding on probing, probing pocket depths and plaque score in addition to quality of life measured with OHIP-14 questionnaires. An overall implant survival of 100% was achieved. The mean marginal bone level (mm) over the entire cohort of 66 measured implants was (1.4 mm; range, 0–5.5). A significant difference (P=0.01) was found between bone level, from implant head to bone contact in the maxilla (M, 0.9 mm; s.d., 1.1; range, 0–4) and the mandible (M, 1.7; s.d., 1.0; range, 0–5.5). The marginal bone-to-implant head distance with the angulated co-axis implants was 1.9 mm (s.d., 1.5; range, 0–5.5) compared to non co-axis, mean 1.2 mm (s.d., 1.1; range, 0–4) (P=0.01). The OHIP-14 overall mean was 3.3 (out of a maximum of 56). CONCLUSION: The implant survival was 100% and the patients benefited from the overdenture treatment on four non-connected implants. The extremely low OHIP-14 indicated a very high level of patient satisfaction following treatment. The results of this study merit further long-term investigation to fully investigate the success of immediately loading implants in the maxilla as well as cost-benefit.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5842836
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58428362018-03-30 Peri-implant health, clinical outcome and patient-centred outcomes of implant-supported overdentures in the mandible and the maxilla Offord, David Mathieson, Grant Kingsford, Nicola Matthys, Carine Glibert, Maarten De Bruyn, Hugo BDJ Open Article OBJECTIVES/AIMS: The primary aim of this retrospective pilot study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of overdentures on four non-splinted maxillary implants compared to the mandible using locator attachments and secondly to assess patient's opinion of the treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The treatment protocol used here is summarised as a single-stage surgical approach followed by immediate loading (same day in 12 of 17 patients) of a removable prosthesis in the maxilla and mandible. Most of the implants were installed into fresh extraction sockets. Clinical outcomes were evaluated in 68 southern implants, straight (non co-axis) or angulated (co-axis) in 17 patients. Patients were examined by independent examiners at an average follow-up of 14.5 months after implant placement. RESULTS: Outcomes measured were implant survival, bone loss, bleeding on probing, probing pocket depths and plaque score in addition to quality of life measured with OHIP-14 questionnaires. An overall implant survival of 100% was achieved. The mean marginal bone level (mm) over the entire cohort of 66 measured implants was (1.4 mm; range, 0–5.5). A significant difference (P=0.01) was found between bone level, from implant head to bone contact in the maxilla (M, 0.9 mm; s.d., 1.1; range, 0–4) and the mandible (M, 1.7; s.d., 1.0; range, 0–5.5). The marginal bone-to-implant head distance with the angulated co-axis implants was 1.9 mm (s.d., 1.5; range, 0–5.5) compared to non co-axis, mean 1.2 mm (s.d., 1.1; range, 0–4) (P=0.01). The OHIP-14 overall mean was 3.3 (out of a maximum of 56). CONCLUSION: The implant survival was 100% and the patients benefited from the overdenture treatment on four non-connected implants. The extremely low OHIP-14 indicated a very high level of patient satisfaction following treatment. The results of this study merit further long-term investigation to fully investigate the success of immediately loading implants in the maxilla as well as cost-benefit. Nature Publishing Group 2017-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5842836/ /pubmed/29607087 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bdjopen.2017.17 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Offord, David
Mathieson, Grant
Kingsford, Nicola
Matthys, Carine
Glibert, Maarten
De Bruyn, Hugo
Peri-implant health, clinical outcome and patient-centred outcomes of implant-supported overdentures in the mandible and the maxilla
title Peri-implant health, clinical outcome and patient-centred outcomes of implant-supported overdentures in the mandible and the maxilla
title_full Peri-implant health, clinical outcome and patient-centred outcomes of implant-supported overdentures in the mandible and the maxilla
title_fullStr Peri-implant health, clinical outcome and patient-centred outcomes of implant-supported overdentures in the mandible and the maxilla
title_full_unstemmed Peri-implant health, clinical outcome and patient-centred outcomes of implant-supported overdentures in the mandible and the maxilla
title_short Peri-implant health, clinical outcome and patient-centred outcomes of implant-supported overdentures in the mandible and the maxilla
title_sort peri-implant health, clinical outcome and patient-centred outcomes of implant-supported overdentures in the mandible and the maxilla
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5842836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29607087
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bdjopen.2017.17
work_keys_str_mv AT offorddavid periimplanthealthclinicaloutcomeandpatientcentredoutcomesofimplantsupportedoverdenturesinthemandibleandthemaxilla
AT mathiesongrant periimplanthealthclinicaloutcomeandpatientcentredoutcomesofimplantsupportedoverdenturesinthemandibleandthemaxilla
AT kingsfordnicola periimplanthealthclinicaloutcomeandpatientcentredoutcomesofimplantsupportedoverdenturesinthemandibleandthemaxilla
AT matthyscarine periimplanthealthclinicaloutcomeandpatientcentredoutcomesofimplantsupportedoverdenturesinthemandibleandthemaxilla
AT glibertmaarten periimplanthealthclinicaloutcomeandpatientcentredoutcomesofimplantsupportedoverdenturesinthemandibleandthemaxilla
AT debruynhugo periimplanthealthclinicaloutcomeandpatientcentredoutcomesofimplantsupportedoverdenturesinthemandibleandthemaxilla