Cargando…

Interarch comparison of intraoral pH and temperature: a pilot study

PURPOSE OF STUDY: The severity of tooth wear is known to have an association with intraoral pH and temperature depending on the site. OBJECTIVE: To compare the intraoral pH and temperature between the maxillary and mandibular arch. METHODS: Fourteen participants (mean age=25.8 years) wore a custom-m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choi, Jung Eun, Lyons, Karl M, McLean, Mitten CB, Waddell, Neil J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5842863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29607069
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bdjopen.2016.8
_version_ 1783304980360331264
author Choi, Jung Eun
Lyons, Karl M
McLean, Mitten CB
Waddell, Neil J
author_facet Choi, Jung Eun
Lyons, Karl M
McLean, Mitten CB
Waddell, Neil J
author_sort Choi, Jung Eun
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE OF STUDY: The severity of tooth wear is known to have an association with intraoral pH and temperature depending on the site. OBJECTIVE: To compare the intraoral pH and temperature between the maxillary and mandibular arch. METHODS: Fourteen participants (mean age=25.8 years) wore a custom-made intraoral appliance fitted with a pH probe and thermocouple for 24 h while carrying out normal activities including sleep. All participants wore a maxillary appliance; four participants repeated the process and wore the mandibular appliance. Measurements were taken from the palatal aspect of the upper central incisors and lingual aspect of the lower canines. Both qualitative and quantitative statistical analyses were conducted. RESULTS: The mean intraoral pH from the maxilla was 7.32 (±0.52) and 7.07 (±0.26) for the mandible. During daytime, there was no statistical significance difference between the two arches (P=0.12). During sleep, there was a significant difference (P<0.001) between the mean pH of the maxilla, 7.0 (±0.46), and mandible, 6.46 (±0.31). The fluctuation patterns of pH and temperature from both arches were similar, but the maxilla showed more variations. The mean temperature from the mandible was slightly higher (36.18 °C (±0.96)) than the maxilla, 33.12 °C (±5.51) during daytime; however, there was no statistically significance difference in temperature between the arches during daytime (awake) or sleep (P=0.27). CONCLUSION: The results showed that there is significant difference in mean intraoral pH between the maxilla and the mandible during sleep, but not during the day and this difference may be associated variations in tooth wear between the arches.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5842863
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58428632018-03-30 Interarch comparison of intraoral pH and temperature: a pilot study Choi, Jung Eun Lyons, Karl M McLean, Mitten CB Waddell, Neil J BDJ Open Article PURPOSE OF STUDY: The severity of tooth wear is known to have an association with intraoral pH and temperature depending on the site. OBJECTIVE: To compare the intraoral pH and temperature between the maxillary and mandibular arch. METHODS: Fourteen participants (mean age=25.8 years) wore a custom-made intraoral appliance fitted with a pH probe and thermocouple for 24 h while carrying out normal activities including sleep. All participants wore a maxillary appliance; four participants repeated the process and wore the mandibular appliance. Measurements were taken from the palatal aspect of the upper central incisors and lingual aspect of the lower canines. Both qualitative and quantitative statistical analyses were conducted. RESULTS: The mean intraoral pH from the maxilla was 7.32 (±0.52) and 7.07 (±0.26) for the mandible. During daytime, there was no statistical significance difference between the two arches (P=0.12). During sleep, there was a significant difference (P<0.001) between the mean pH of the maxilla, 7.0 (±0.46), and mandible, 6.46 (±0.31). The fluctuation patterns of pH and temperature from both arches were similar, but the maxilla showed more variations. The mean temperature from the mandible was slightly higher (36.18 °C (±0.96)) than the maxilla, 33.12 °C (±5.51) during daytime; however, there was no statistically significance difference in temperature between the arches during daytime (awake) or sleep (P=0.27). CONCLUSION: The results showed that there is significant difference in mean intraoral pH between the maxilla and the mandible during sleep, but not during the day and this difference may be associated variations in tooth wear between the arches. Nature Publishing Group 2016-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5842863/ /pubmed/29607069 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bdjopen.2016.8 Text en Copyright © 2016 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Choi, Jung Eun
Lyons, Karl M
McLean, Mitten CB
Waddell, Neil J
Interarch comparison of intraoral pH and temperature: a pilot study
title Interarch comparison of intraoral pH and temperature: a pilot study
title_full Interarch comparison of intraoral pH and temperature: a pilot study
title_fullStr Interarch comparison of intraoral pH and temperature: a pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Interarch comparison of intraoral pH and temperature: a pilot study
title_short Interarch comparison of intraoral pH and temperature: a pilot study
title_sort interarch comparison of intraoral ph and temperature: a pilot study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5842863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29607069
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bdjopen.2016.8
work_keys_str_mv AT choijungeun interarchcomparisonofintraoralphandtemperatureapilotstudy
AT lyonskarlm interarchcomparisonofintraoralphandtemperatureapilotstudy
AT mcleanmittencb interarchcomparisonofintraoralphandtemperatureapilotstudy
AT waddellneilj interarchcomparisonofintraoralphandtemperatureapilotstudy