Cargando…
Interarch comparison of intraoral pH and temperature: a pilot study
PURPOSE OF STUDY: The severity of tooth wear is known to have an association with intraoral pH and temperature depending on the site. OBJECTIVE: To compare the intraoral pH and temperature between the maxillary and mandibular arch. METHODS: Fourteen participants (mean age=25.8 years) wore a custom-m...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5842863/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29607069 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bdjopen.2016.8 |
_version_ | 1783304980360331264 |
---|---|
author | Choi, Jung Eun Lyons, Karl M McLean, Mitten CB Waddell, Neil J |
author_facet | Choi, Jung Eun Lyons, Karl M McLean, Mitten CB Waddell, Neil J |
author_sort | Choi, Jung Eun |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE OF STUDY: The severity of tooth wear is known to have an association with intraoral pH and temperature depending on the site. OBJECTIVE: To compare the intraoral pH and temperature between the maxillary and mandibular arch. METHODS: Fourteen participants (mean age=25.8 years) wore a custom-made intraoral appliance fitted with a pH probe and thermocouple for 24 h while carrying out normal activities including sleep. All participants wore a maxillary appliance; four participants repeated the process and wore the mandibular appliance. Measurements were taken from the palatal aspect of the upper central incisors and lingual aspect of the lower canines. Both qualitative and quantitative statistical analyses were conducted. RESULTS: The mean intraoral pH from the maxilla was 7.32 (±0.52) and 7.07 (±0.26) for the mandible. During daytime, there was no statistical significance difference between the two arches (P=0.12). During sleep, there was a significant difference (P<0.001) between the mean pH of the maxilla, 7.0 (±0.46), and mandible, 6.46 (±0.31). The fluctuation patterns of pH and temperature from both arches were similar, but the maxilla showed more variations. The mean temperature from the mandible was slightly higher (36.18 °C (±0.96)) than the maxilla, 33.12 °C (±5.51) during daytime; however, there was no statistically significance difference in temperature between the arches during daytime (awake) or sleep (P=0.27). CONCLUSION: The results showed that there is significant difference in mean intraoral pH between the maxilla and the mandible during sleep, but not during the day and this difference may be associated variations in tooth wear between the arches. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5842863 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58428632018-03-30 Interarch comparison of intraoral pH and temperature: a pilot study Choi, Jung Eun Lyons, Karl M McLean, Mitten CB Waddell, Neil J BDJ Open Article PURPOSE OF STUDY: The severity of tooth wear is known to have an association with intraoral pH and temperature depending on the site. OBJECTIVE: To compare the intraoral pH and temperature between the maxillary and mandibular arch. METHODS: Fourteen participants (mean age=25.8 years) wore a custom-made intraoral appliance fitted with a pH probe and thermocouple for 24 h while carrying out normal activities including sleep. All participants wore a maxillary appliance; four participants repeated the process and wore the mandibular appliance. Measurements were taken from the palatal aspect of the upper central incisors and lingual aspect of the lower canines. Both qualitative and quantitative statistical analyses were conducted. RESULTS: The mean intraoral pH from the maxilla was 7.32 (±0.52) and 7.07 (±0.26) for the mandible. During daytime, there was no statistical significance difference between the two arches (P=0.12). During sleep, there was a significant difference (P<0.001) between the mean pH of the maxilla, 7.0 (±0.46), and mandible, 6.46 (±0.31). The fluctuation patterns of pH and temperature from both arches were similar, but the maxilla showed more variations. The mean temperature from the mandible was slightly higher (36.18 °C (±0.96)) than the maxilla, 33.12 °C (±5.51) during daytime; however, there was no statistically significance difference in temperature between the arches during daytime (awake) or sleep (P=0.27). CONCLUSION: The results showed that there is significant difference in mean intraoral pH between the maxilla and the mandible during sleep, but not during the day and this difference may be associated variations in tooth wear between the arches. Nature Publishing Group 2016-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5842863/ /pubmed/29607069 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bdjopen.2016.8 Text en Copyright © 2016 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Choi, Jung Eun Lyons, Karl M McLean, Mitten CB Waddell, Neil J Interarch comparison of intraoral pH and temperature: a pilot study |
title | Interarch comparison of intraoral pH and temperature: a pilot study |
title_full | Interarch comparison of intraoral pH and temperature: a pilot study |
title_fullStr | Interarch comparison of intraoral pH and temperature: a pilot study |
title_full_unstemmed | Interarch comparison of intraoral pH and temperature: a pilot study |
title_short | Interarch comparison of intraoral pH and temperature: a pilot study |
title_sort | interarch comparison of intraoral ph and temperature: a pilot study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5842863/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29607069 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bdjopen.2016.8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT choijungeun interarchcomparisonofintraoralphandtemperatureapilotstudy AT lyonskarlm interarchcomparisonofintraoralphandtemperatureapilotstudy AT mcleanmittencb interarchcomparisonofintraoralphandtemperatureapilotstudy AT waddellneilj interarchcomparisonofintraoralphandtemperatureapilotstudy |