Cargando…

Is it appropriate to use WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study standards to assess the growth parameters of Sri Lankan babies? A single-centre cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE: To compare the anthropometric measurements of newborns in a tertiary care hospital in Sri Lanka, with WHO standards. METHODS: Birth weight, length and occipitofrontal circumference (OFC) of 400 consecutive, term newborns of healthy mothers were measured in a tertiary care hospital. RESULT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abeyagunawardena, Ishanya Ayeshini, Abeynayake, Arundhi, Anuththara, Thushani, Alawaththegama, Kasun, Amanda, Sakuni, Abeyrathne, Vishaka, Amaradasa, Prabhadi, Anuradha, Buddhika, Ahmed, Hanan, Abeykoon, Chathupa, Fernando, Dinesh Malcolm Gerard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5842993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29637182
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2017-000174
_version_ 1783304995880304640
author Abeyagunawardena, Ishanya Ayeshini
Abeynayake, Arundhi
Anuththara, Thushani
Alawaththegama, Kasun
Amanda, Sakuni
Abeyrathne, Vishaka
Amaradasa, Prabhadi
Anuradha, Buddhika
Ahmed, Hanan
Abeykoon, Chathupa
Fernando, Dinesh Malcolm Gerard
author_facet Abeyagunawardena, Ishanya Ayeshini
Abeynayake, Arundhi
Anuththara, Thushani
Alawaththegama, Kasun
Amanda, Sakuni
Abeyrathne, Vishaka
Amaradasa, Prabhadi
Anuradha, Buddhika
Ahmed, Hanan
Abeykoon, Chathupa
Fernando, Dinesh Malcolm Gerard
author_sort Abeyagunawardena, Ishanya Ayeshini
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the anthropometric measurements of newborns in a tertiary care hospital in Sri Lanka, with WHO standards. METHODS: Birth weight, length and occipitofrontal circumference (OFC) of 400 consecutive, term newborns of healthy mothers were measured in a tertiary care hospital. RESULTS: 400 subjects were approached and seven were excluded, concluding the study population to 184 boys and 209 females. Medians of birth weight, length and OFC were 3000 g, 49.95 cm and 34.15 cm of males and IQRs were 555.00, 2.70 and 1.70, respectively. For females, the medians of birth weight, length and OFC were 2900 g, 48.9 cm and 34.00 cm with IQRs of 450.00, 2.70 and 1.50, respectively. The two-tailed t-test revealed that median weights of males (t=9.632) and females (t=12.04) and OFC of males (t=3.98) were significantly lower than the WHO medians. There was a significant association of birth weight, with mother’s prepregnancy weight, in males (β coefficient=12.629 with 95% CI 6.275 to 18.982) and females (β coefficient=5.880, 95% CI 1.434 to 10.325). Significant associations of length (β coefficient=0.046, 95% CI 0.012 to 0.080) and OFC (β coefficient=0.033, 95% CI 0.014 to 0.053) with mother’s prepregnancy weight in males and length (β coefficient=0.084, 95% CI 0.022 to 0.145) and weight (β coefficient=10.780, 95% CI 0.93 to 20.629) with maternal age in females were found. Furthermore, birth weight in males was significantly associated with maternal height (β coefficient=10.899, 95% CI 0.552 to 21.247). Education level, ethnicity and parity showed no significant associations with above parameters. CONCLUSION: The median weights of both sexes and OFC in males were significantly lower than the WHO standards. Island-wide studies are indicated to evaluate the appropriateness of applying WHO standards to Sri Lankan newborns.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5842993
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58429932018-04-10 Is it appropriate to use WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study standards to assess the growth parameters of Sri Lankan babies? A single-centre cross-sectional study Abeyagunawardena, Ishanya Ayeshini Abeynayake, Arundhi Anuththara, Thushani Alawaththegama, Kasun Amanda, Sakuni Abeyrathne, Vishaka Amaradasa, Prabhadi Anuradha, Buddhika Ahmed, Hanan Abeykoon, Chathupa Fernando, Dinesh Malcolm Gerard BMJ Paediatr Open Original Article OBJECTIVE: To compare the anthropometric measurements of newborns in a tertiary care hospital in Sri Lanka, with WHO standards. METHODS: Birth weight, length and occipitofrontal circumference (OFC) of 400 consecutive, term newborns of healthy mothers were measured in a tertiary care hospital. RESULTS: 400 subjects were approached and seven were excluded, concluding the study population to 184 boys and 209 females. Medians of birth weight, length and OFC were 3000 g, 49.95 cm and 34.15 cm of males and IQRs were 555.00, 2.70 and 1.70, respectively. For females, the medians of birth weight, length and OFC were 2900 g, 48.9 cm and 34.00 cm with IQRs of 450.00, 2.70 and 1.50, respectively. The two-tailed t-test revealed that median weights of males (t=9.632) and females (t=12.04) and OFC of males (t=3.98) were significantly lower than the WHO medians. There was a significant association of birth weight, with mother’s prepregnancy weight, in males (β coefficient=12.629 with 95% CI 6.275 to 18.982) and females (β coefficient=5.880, 95% CI 1.434 to 10.325). Significant associations of length (β coefficient=0.046, 95% CI 0.012 to 0.080) and OFC (β coefficient=0.033, 95% CI 0.014 to 0.053) with mother’s prepregnancy weight in males and length (β coefficient=0.084, 95% CI 0.022 to 0.145) and weight (β coefficient=10.780, 95% CI 0.93 to 20.629) with maternal age in females were found. Furthermore, birth weight in males was significantly associated with maternal height (β coefficient=10.899, 95% CI 0.552 to 21.247). Education level, ethnicity and parity showed no significant associations with above parameters. CONCLUSION: The median weights of both sexes and OFC in males were significantly lower than the WHO standards. Island-wide studies are indicated to evaluate the appropriateness of applying WHO standards to Sri Lankan newborns. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5842993/ /pubmed/29637182 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2017-000174 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
Abeyagunawardena, Ishanya Ayeshini
Abeynayake, Arundhi
Anuththara, Thushani
Alawaththegama, Kasun
Amanda, Sakuni
Abeyrathne, Vishaka
Amaradasa, Prabhadi
Anuradha, Buddhika
Ahmed, Hanan
Abeykoon, Chathupa
Fernando, Dinesh Malcolm Gerard
Is it appropriate to use WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study standards to assess the growth parameters of Sri Lankan babies? A single-centre cross-sectional study
title Is it appropriate to use WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study standards to assess the growth parameters of Sri Lankan babies? A single-centre cross-sectional study
title_full Is it appropriate to use WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study standards to assess the growth parameters of Sri Lankan babies? A single-centre cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Is it appropriate to use WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study standards to assess the growth parameters of Sri Lankan babies? A single-centre cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Is it appropriate to use WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study standards to assess the growth parameters of Sri Lankan babies? A single-centre cross-sectional study
title_short Is it appropriate to use WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study standards to assess the growth parameters of Sri Lankan babies? A single-centre cross-sectional study
title_sort is it appropriate to use who multicentre growth reference study standards to assess the growth parameters of sri lankan babies? a single-centre cross-sectional study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5842993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29637182
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2017-000174
work_keys_str_mv AT abeyagunawardenaishanyaayeshini isitappropriatetousewhomulticentregrowthreferencestudystandardstoassessthegrowthparametersofsrilankanbabiesasinglecentrecrosssectionalstudy
AT abeynayakearundhi isitappropriatetousewhomulticentregrowthreferencestudystandardstoassessthegrowthparametersofsrilankanbabiesasinglecentrecrosssectionalstudy
AT anuththarathushani isitappropriatetousewhomulticentregrowthreferencestudystandardstoassessthegrowthparametersofsrilankanbabiesasinglecentrecrosssectionalstudy
AT alawaththegamakasun isitappropriatetousewhomulticentregrowthreferencestudystandardstoassessthegrowthparametersofsrilankanbabiesasinglecentrecrosssectionalstudy
AT amandasakuni isitappropriatetousewhomulticentregrowthreferencestudystandardstoassessthegrowthparametersofsrilankanbabiesasinglecentrecrosssectionalstudy
AT abeyrathnevishaka isitappropriatetousewhomulticentregrowthreferencestudystandardstoassessthegrowthparametersofsrilankanbabiesasinglecentrecrosssectionalstudy
AT amaradasaprabhadi isitappropriatetousewhomulticentregrowthreferencestudystandardstoassessthegrowthparametersofsrilankanbabiesasinglecentrecrosssectionalstudy
AT anuradhabuddhika isitappropriatetousewhomulticentregrowthreferencestudystandardstoassessthegrowthparametersofsrilankanbabiesasinglecentrecrosssectionalstudy
AT ahmedhanan isitappropriatetousewhomulticentregrowthreferencestudystandardstoassessthegrowthparametersofsrilankanbabiesasinglecentrecrosssectionalstudy
AT abeykoonchathupa isitappropriatetousewhomulticentregrowthreferencestudystandardstoassessthegrowthparametersofsrilankanbabiesasinglecentrecrosssectionalstudy
AT fernandodineshmalcolmgerard isitappropriatetousewhomulticentregrowthreferencestudystandardstoassessthegrowthparametersofsrilankanbabiesasinglecentrecrosssectionalstudy