Cargando…
Is it appropriate to use WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study standards to assess the growth parameters of Sri Lankan babies? A single-centre cross-sectional study
OBJECTIVE: To compare the anthropometric measurements of newborns in a tertiary care hospital in Sri Lanka, with WHO standards. METHODS: Birth weight, length and occipitofrontal circumference (OFC) of 400 consecutive, term newborns of healthy mothers were measured in a tertiary care hospital. RESULT...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5842993/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29637182 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2017-000174 |
_version_ | 1783304995880304640 |
---|---|
author | Abeyagunawardena, Ishanya Ayeshini Abeynayake, Arundhi Anuththara, Thushani Alawaththegama, Kasun Amanda, Sakuni Abeyrathne, Vishaka Amaradasa, Prabhadi Anuradha, Buddhika Ahmed, Hanan Abeykoon, Chathupa Fernando, Dinesh Malcolm Gerard |
author_facet | Abeyagunawardena, Ishanya Ayeshini Abeynayake, Arundhi Anuththara, Thushani Alawaththegama, Kasun Amanda, Sakuni Abeyrathne, Vishaka Amaradasa, Prabhadi Anuradha, Buddhika Ahmed, Hanan Abeykoon, Chathupa Fernando, Dinesh Malcolm Gerard |
author_sort | Abeyagunawardena, Ishanya Ayeshini |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To compare the anthropometric measurements of newborns in a tertiary care hospital in Sri Lanka, with WHO standards. METHODS: Birth weight, length and occipitofrontal circumference (OFC) of 400 consecutive, term newborns of healthy mothers were measured in a tertiary care hospital. RESULTS: 400 subjects were approached and seven were excluded, concluding the study population to 184 boys and 209 females. Medians of birth weight, length and OFC were 3000 g, 49.95 cm and 34.15 cm of males and IQRs were 555.00, 2.70 and 1.70, respectively. For females, the medians of birth weight, length and OFC were 2900 g, 48.9 cm and 34.00 cm with IQRs of 450.00, 2.70 and 1.50, respectively. The two-tailed t-test revealed that median weights of males (t=9.632) and females (t=12.04) and OFC of males (t=3.98) were significantly lower than the WHO medians. There was a significant association of birth weight, with mother’s prepregnancy weight, in males (β coefficient=12.629 with 95% CI 6.275 to 18.982) and females (β coefficient=5.880, 95% CI 1.434 to 10.325). Significant associations of length (β coefficient=0.046, 95% CI 0.012 to 0.080) and OFC (β coefficient=0.033, 95% CI 0.014 to 0.053) with mother’s prepregnancy weight in males and length (β coefficient=0.084, 95% CI 0.022 to 0.145) and weight (β coefficient=10.780, 95% CI 0.93 to 20.629) with maternal age in females were found. Furthermore, birth weight in males was significantly associated with maternal height (β coefficient=10.899, 95% CI 0.552 to 21.247). Education level, ethnicity and parity showed no significant associations with above parameters. CONCLUSION: The median weights of both sexes and OFC in males were significantly lower than the WHO standards. Island-wide studies are indicated to evaluate the appropriateness of applying WHO standards to Sri Lankan newborns. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5842993 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58429932018-04-10 Is it appropriate to use WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study standards to assess the growth parameters of Sri Lankan babies? A single-centre cross-sectional study Abeyagunawardena, Ishanya Ayeshini Abeynayake, Arundhi Anuththara, Thushani Alawaththegama, Kasun Amanda, Sakuni Abeyrathne, Vishaka Amaradasa, Prabhadi Anuradha, Buddhika Ahmed, Hanan Abeykoon, Chathupa Fernando, Dinesh Malcolm Gerard BMJ Paediatr Open Original Article OBJECTIVE: To compare the anthropometric measurements of newborns in a tertiary care hospital in Sri Lanka, with WHO standards. METHODS: Birth weight, length and occipitofrontal circumference (OFC) of 400 consecutive, term newborns of healthy mothers were measured in a tertiary care hospital. RESULTS: 400 subjects were approached and seven were excluded, concluding the study population to 184 boys and 209 females. Medians of birth weight, length and OFC were 3000 g, 49.95 cm and 34.15 cm of males and IQRs were 555.00, 2.70 and 1.70, respectively. For females, the medians of birth weight, length and OFC were 2900 g, 48.9 cm and 34.00 cm with IQRs of 450.00, 2.70 and 1.50, respectively. The two-tailed t-test revealed that median weights of males (t=9.632) and females (t=12.04) and OFC of males (t=3.98) were significantly lower than the WHO medians. There was a significant association of birth weight, with mother’s prepregnancy weight, in males (β coefficient=12.629 with 95% CI 6.275 to 18.982) and females (β coefficient=5.880, 95% CI 1.434 to 10.325). Significant associations of length (β coefficient=0.046, 95% CI 0.012 to 0.080) and OFC (β coefficient=0.033, 95% CI 0.014 to 0.053) with mother’s prepregnancy weight in males and length (β coefficient=0.084, 95% CI 0.022 to 0.145) and weight (β coefficient=10.780, 95% CI 0.93 to 20.629) with maternal age in females were found. Furthermore, birth weight in males was significantly associated with maternal height (β coefficient=10.899, 95% CI 0.552 to 21.247). Education level, ethnicity and parity showed no significant associations with above parameters. CONCLUSION: The median weights of both sexes and OFC in males were significantly lower than the WHO standards. Island-wide studies are indicated to evaluate the appropriateness of applying WHO standards to Sri Lankan newborns. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5842993/ /pubmed/29637182 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2017-000174 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Original Article Abeyagunawardena, Ishanya Ayeshini Abeynayake, Arundhi Anuththara, Thushani Alawaththegama, Kasun Amanda, Sakuni Abeyrathne, Vishaka Amaradasa, Prabhadi Anuradha, Buddhika Ahmed, Hanan Abeykoon, Chathupa Fernando, Dinesh Malcolm Gerard Is it appropriate to use WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study standards to assess the growth parameters of Sri Lankan babies? A single-centre cross-sectional study |
title | Is it appropriate to use WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study standards to assess the growth parameters of Sri Lankan babies? A single-centre cross-sectional study |
title_full | Is it appropriate to use WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study standards to assess the growth parameters of Sri Lankan babies? A single-centre cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr | Is it appropriate to use WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study standards to assess the growth parameters of Sri Lankan babies? A single-centre cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed | Is it appropriate to use WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study standards to assess the growth parameters of Sri Lankan babies? A single-centre cross-sectional study |
title_short | Is it appropriate to use WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study standards to assess the growth parameters of Sri Lankan babies? A single-centre cross-sectional study |
title_sort | is it appropriate to use who multicentre growth reference study standards to assess the growth parameters of sri lankan babies? a single-centre cross-sectional study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5842993/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29637182 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2017-000174 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abeyagunawardenaishanyaayeshini isitappropriatetousewhomulticentregrowthreferencestudystandardstoassessthegrowthparametersofsrilankanbabiesasinglecentrecrosssectionalstudy AT abeynayakearundhi isitappropriatetousewhomulticentregrowthreferencestudystandardstoassessthegrowthparametersofsrilankanbabiesasinglecentrecrosssectionalstudy AT anuththarathushani isitappropriatetousewhomulticentregrowthreferencestudystandardstoassessthegrowthparametersofsrilankanbabiesasinglecentrecrosssectionalstudy AT alawaththegamakasun isitappropriatetousewhomulticentregrowthreferencestudystandardstoassessthegrowthparametersofsrilankanbabiesasinglecentrecrosssectionalstudy AT amandasakuni isitappropriatetousewhomulticentregrowthreferencestudystandardstoassessthegrowthparametersofsrilankanbabiesasinglecentrecrosssectionalstudy AT abeyrathnevishaka isitappropriatetousewhomulticentregrowthreferencestudystandardstoassessthegrowthparametersofsrilankanbabiesasinglecentrecrosssectionalstudy AT amaradasaprabhadi isitappropriatetousewhomulticentregrowthreferencestudystandardstoassessthegrowthparametersofsrilankanbabiesasinglecentrecrosssectionalstudy AT anuradhabuddhika isitappropriatetousewhomulticentregrowthreferencestudystandardstoassessthegrowthparametersofsrilankanbabiesasinglecentrecrosssectionalstudy AT ahmedhanan isitappropriatetousewhomulticentregrowthreferencestudystandardstoassessthegrowthparametersofsrilankanbabiesasinglecentrecrosssectionalstudy AT abeykoonchathupa isitappropriatetousewhomulticentregrowthreferencestudystandardstoassessthegrowthparametersofsrilankanbabiesasinglecentrecrosssectionalstudy AT fernandodineshmalcolmgerard isitappropriatetousewhomulticentregrowthreferencestudystandardstoassessthegrowthparametersofsrilankanbabiesasinglecentrecrosssectionalstudy |