Cargando…
Position paper on current aspects of sponsoring in accredited CME
This position paper is the result of a collaborative approach of several European Specialty Accreditation Boards (ESABs) and, has been stimulated by their current experience in accreditation regarding roles and responsibilities assumed by sponsors of accredited continuing medical education (CME). Th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5843059/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29644130 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21614083.2017.1312062 |
_version_ | 1783305011258720256 |
---|---|
author | Stolz, Daiana Griebenow, Reinhard Tichelli, Andre Ullmann, Andrew J. Costello, Richard W. Michalis, Lampros Guenova, Margarita Sutter, Sandy De Andrade, Fabiola Schaefer, Robert |
author_facet | Stolz, Daiana Griebenow, Reinhard Tichelli, Andre Ullmann, Andrew J. Costello, Richard W. Michalis, Lampros Guenova, Margarita Sutter, Sandy De Andrade, Fabiola Schaefer, Robert |
author_sort | Stolz, Daiana |
collection | PubMed |
description | This position paper is the result of a collaborative approach of several European Specialty Accreditation Boards (ESABs) and, has been stimulated by their current experience in accreditation regarding roles and responsibilities assumed by sponsors of accredited continuing medical education (CME). The suggestions made in this paper aim to preserve the fundamental principle in CME accreditation that the physician in charge of the programme has sole responsibility for the selection of topics, speakers, content and format, as well as mode of presentation, and that sponsors will under no circumstances interfere with this principle. This is considered as a responsibility of an individual physician (or physicians), which cannot be delegated, even in part, to third parties. This responsibility has been extended to include all communication before and after the event. The paper also identifies undecided issues, about which ESABs are committed to elaborate proposals in the future. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5843059 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58430592018-04-11 Position paper on current aspects of sponsoring in accredited CME Stolz, Daiana Griebenow, Reinhard Tichelli, Andre Ullmann, Andrew J. Costello, Richard W. Michalis, Lampros Guenova, Margarita Sutter, Sandy De Andrade, Fabiola Schaefer, Robert J Eur CME Position Paper This position paper is the result of a collaborative approach of several European Specialty Accreditation Boards (ESABs) and, has been stimulated by their current experience in accreditation regarding roles and responsibilities assumed by sponsors of accredited continuing medical education (CME). The suggestions made in this paper aim to preserve the fundamental principle in CME accreditation that the physician in charge of the programme has sole responsibility for the selection of topics, speakers, content and format, as well as mode of presentation, and that sponsors will under no circumstances interfere with this principle. This is considered as a responsibility of an individual physician (or physicians), which cannot be delegated, even in part, to third parties. This responsibility has been extended to include all communication before and after the event. The paper also identifies undecided issues, about which ESABs are committed to elaborate proposals in the future. Taylor & Francis 2017-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5843059/ /pubmed/29644130 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21614083.2017.1312062 Text en © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Position Paper Stolz, Daiana Griebenow, Reinhard Tichelli, Andre Ullmann, Andrew J. Costello, Richard W. Michalis, Lampros Guenova, Margarita Sutter, Sandy De Andrade, Fabiola Schaefer, Robert Position paper on current aspects of sponsoring in accredited CME |
title | Position paper on current aspects of sponsoring in accredited CME |
title_full | Position paper on current aspects of sponsoring in accredited CME |
title_fullStr | Position paper on current aspects of sponsoring in accredited CME |
title_full_unstemmed | Position paper on current aspects of sponsoring in accredited CME |
title_short | Position paper on current aspects of sponsoring in accredited CME |
title_sort | position paper on current aspects of sponsoring in accredited cme |
topic | Position Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5843059/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29644130 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21614083.2017.1312062 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stolzdaiana positionpaperoncurrentaspectsofsponsoringinaccreditedcme AT griebenowreinhard positionpaperoncurrentaspectsofsponsoringinaccreditedcme AT tichelliandre positionpaperoncurrentaspectsofsponsoringinaccreditedcme AT ullmannandrewj positionpaperoncurrentaspectsofsponsoringinaccreditedcme AT costellorichardw positionpaperoncurrentaspectsofsponsoringinaccreditedcme AT michalislampros positionpaperoncurrentaspectsofsponsoringinaccreditedcme AT guenovamargarita positionpaperoncurrentaspectsofsponsoringinaccreditedcme AT suttersandy positionpaperoncurrentaspectsofsponsoringinaccreditedcme AT deandradefabiola positionpaperoncurrentaspectsofsponsoringinaccreditedcme AT schaeferrobert positionpaperoncurrentaspectsofsponsoringinaccreditedcme |