Cargando…

Compliance to HIV treatment monitoring guidelines can reduce laboratory costs

BACKGROUND: Panel tests are a predetermined group of tests commonly requested together to provide a comprehensive and conclusive diagnosis, for example, liver function test (LFT). South African HIV antiretroviral treatment (ART) guidelines recommend individual tests for toxicity monitoring over pane...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cassim, Naseem, Coetzee, Lindi M., Schnippel, Kathryn, Glencross, Deborah K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AOSIS 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5843144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29568608
http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajhivmed.v17i1.449
_version_ 1783305027976167424
author Cassim, Naseem
Coetzee, Lindi M.
Schnippel, Kathryn
Glencross, Deborah K.
author_facet Cassim, Naseem
Coetzee, Lindi M.
Schnippel, Kathryn
Glencross, Deborah K.
author_sort Cassim, Naseem
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Panel tests are a predetermined group of tests commonly requested together to provide a comprehensive and conclusive diagnosis, for example, liver function test (LFT). South African HIV antiretroviral treatment (ART) guidelines recommend individual tests for toxicity monitoring over panel tests. In 2008, the National Health Laboratory Services (NHLS) request form was redesigned to list individual tests instead of panel tests and removed the ‘other tests’ box option to facilitate efficient ART laboratory monitoring. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to demonstrate changes in laboratory expenditure, for individual and panel tests, for ART toxicity monitoring. METHOD: NHLS Corporate Data Warehouse (CDW) data were extracted for HIV conditional grant accounts to assess ART toxicity monitoring laboratory expenditure between 2010/2011 and 2014/2015. Data were classified based on the tests requested, as either panel (LFT or urea and electrolytes) or individual (alanine transaminase or creatinine) tests. RESULTS: Expenditure on panel tests reduced from R340 million in 2010/2011 to R140m by 2014/2015 (reduction of R204m) and individual test expenditure increased from R34m to R76m (twofold increase). A significant reduction in LFT panel expenditure was noted, reducing from R322m in 2010/2011 to R130m in 2014/2015 (60% reduction). CONCLUSION: Changes in toxicity monitoring guidelines and the re-engineering of the NHLS request form successfully reduced expenditure on panel tests relative to individual tests. The introduction of order entry systems could further reduce unnecessary laboratory expenditure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5843144
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher AOSIS
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58431442018-03-22 Compliance to HIV treatment monitoring guidelines can reduce laboratory costs Cassim, Naseem Coetzee, Lindi M. Schnippel, Kathryn Glencross, Deborah K. South Afr J HIV Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Panel tests are a predetermined group of tests commonly requested together to provide a comprehensive and conclusive diagnosis, for example, liver function test (LFT). South African HIV antiretroviral treatment (ART) guidelines recommend individual tests for toxicity monitoring over panel tests. In 2008, the National Health Laboratory Services (NHLS) request form was redesigned to list individual tests instead of panel tests and removed the ‘other tests’ box option to facilitate efficient ART laboratory monitoring. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to demonstrate changes in laboratory expenditure, for individual and panel tests, for ART toxicity monitoring. METHOD: NHLS Corporate Data Warehouse (CDW) data were extracted for HIV conditional grant accounts to assess ART toxicity monitoring laboratory expenditure between 2010/2011 and 2014/2015. Data were classified based on the tests requested, as either panel (LFT or urea and electrolytes) or individual (alanine transaminase or creatinine) tests. RESULTS: Expenditure on panel tests reduced from R340 million in 2010/2011 to R140m by 2014/2015 (reduction of R204m) and individual test expenditure increased from R34m to R76m (twofold increase). A significant reduction in LFT panel expenditure was noted, reducing from R322m in 2010/2011 to R130m in 2014/2015 (60% reduction). CONCLUSION: Changes in toxicity monitoring guidelines and the re-engineering of the NHLS request form successfully reduced expenditure on panel tests relative to individual tests. The introduction of order entry systems could further reduce unnecessary laboratory expenditure. AOSIS 2016-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5843144/ /pubmed/29568608 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajhivmed.v17i1.449 Text en © 2016. The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ Licensee: AOSIS. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License.
spellingShingle Original Research
Cassim, Naseem
Coetzee, Lindi M.
Schnippel, Kathryn
Glencross, Deborah K.
Compliance to HIV treatment monitoring guidelines can reduce laboratory costs
title Compliance to HIV treatment monitoring guidelines can reduce laboratory costs
title_full Compliance to HIV treatment monitoring guidelines can reduce laboratory costs
title_fullStr Compliance to HIV treatment monitoring guidelines can reduce laboratory costs
title_full_unstemmed Compliance to HIV treatment monitoring guidelines can reduce laboratory costs
title_short Compliance to HIV treatment monitoring guidelines can reduce laboratory costs
title_sort compliance to hiv treatment monitoring guidelines can reduce laboratory costs
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5843144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29568608
http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajhivmed.v17i1.449
work_keys_str_mv AT cassimnaseem compliancetohivtreatmentmonitoringguidelinescanreducelaboratorycosts
AT coetzeelindim compliancetohivtreatmentmonitoringguidelinescanreducelaboratorycosts
AT schnippelkathryn compliancetohivtreatmentmonitoringguidelinescanreducelaboratorycosts
AT glencrossdeborahk compliancetohivtreatmentmonitoringguidelinescanreducelaboratorycosts