Cargando…
Variability and validity of intimate partner violence reporting by couples in Tanzania
In recent years, major global institutions have amplified their efforts to address intimate partner violence (IPV) against women—a global health and human rights violation affecting 15–71% of reproductive aged women over their lifetimes. Still, some scholars remain concerned about the validity of in...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5843259/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29518162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193253 |
_version_ | 1783305053407281152 |
---|---|
author | Halim, Nafisa Steven, Ester Reich, Naomi Badi, Lilian Messersmith, Lisa |
author_facet | Halim, Nafisa Steven, Ester Reich, Naomi Badi, Lilian Messersmith, Lisa |
author_sort | Halim, Nafisa |
collection | PubMed |
description | In recent years, major global institutions have amplified their efforts to address intimate partner violence (IPV) against women—a global health and human rights violation affecting 15–71% of reproductive aged women over their lifetimes. Still, some scholars remain concerned about the validity of instruments used for IPV assessment in population-based studies. In this paper, we conducted two validation analyses using novel data from 450 women-men dyads across nine villages in Northern Tanzania. First, we examined the level of inter-partner agreement in reporting of men’s physical, sexual, emotional and economic IPV against women in the last three and twelve months prior to the survey, ever in the relationship, and during pregnancy. Second, we conducted a convergent validity analysis to compare the relative efficacy of men’s self-reports of perpetration and women’s of victimization as a valid indicator of IPV against Tanzanian women using logistic regression models with village-level clustered errors. We found that, for every violence type across the recall periods of the last three months, the last twelve months and ever in the relationship, at least one in three couples disagreed about IPV occurrences in the relationship. Couples’ agreement about physical, sexual and economic IPV during pregnancy was high with 86–93% of couples reporting concordantly. Also, men’s self-reported perpetration had statistically significant associations with at least as many validated risk factors as had women’s self-reported victimization. This finding suggests that men’s self-reports are at least as valid as women’s as an indicator of IPV against women in Northern Tanzania. We recommend more validation studies are conducted in low-income countries, and that data on relationship factors affecting IPV reports and reporting are made available along with data on IPV occurrences. Keywords: Intimate partner violence; measurement; validity; survey research; Tanzania. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5843259 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58432592018-03-23 Variability and validity of intimate partner violence reporting by couples in Tanzania Halim, Nafisa Steven, Ester Reich, Naomi Badi, Lilian Messersmith, Lisa PLoS One Research Article In recent years, major global institutions have amplified their efforts to address intimate partner violence (IPV) against women—a global health and human rights violation affecting 15–71% of reproductive aged women over their lifetimes. Still, some scholars remain concerned about the validity of instruments used for IPV assessment in population-based studies. In this paper, we conducted two validation analyses using novel data from 450 women-men dyads across nine villages in Northern Tanzania. First, we examined the level of inter-partner agreement in reporting of men’s physical, sexual, emotional and economic IPV against women in the last three and twelve months prior to the survey, ever in the relationship, and during pregnancy. Second, we conducted a convergent validity analysis to compare the relative efficacy of men’s self-reports of perpetration and women’s of victimization as a valid indicator of IPV against Tanzanian women using logistic regression models with village-level clustered errors. We found that, for every violence type across the recall periods of the last three months, the last twelve months and ever in the relationship, at least one in three couples disagreed about IPV occurrences in the relationship. Couples’ agreement about physical, sexual and economic IPV during pregnancy was high with 86–93% of couples reporting concordantly. Also, men’s self-reported perpetration had statistically significant associations with at least as many validated risk factors as had women’s self-reported victimization. This finding suggests that men’s self-reports are at least as valid as women’s as an indicator of IPV against women in Northern Tanzania. We recommend more validation studies are conducted in low-income countries, and that data on relationship factors affecting IPV reports and reporting are made available along with data on IPV occurrences. Keywords: Intimate partner violence; measurement; validity; survey research; Tanzania. Public Library of Science 2018-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5843259/ /pubmed/29518162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193253 Text en © 2018 Halim et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Halim, Nafisa Steven, Ester Reich, Naomi Badi, Lilian Messersmith, Lisa Variability and validity of intimate partner violence reporting by couples in Tanzania |
title | Variability and validity of intimate partner violence reporting by couples in Tanzania |
title_full | Variability and validity of intimate partner violence reporting by couples in Tanzania |
title_fullStr | Variability and validity of intimate partner violence reporting by couples in Tanzania |
title_full_unstemmed | Variability and validity of intimate partner violence reporting by couples in Tanzania |
title_short | Variability and validity of intimate partner violence reporting by couples in Tanzania |
title_sort | variability and validity of intimate partner violence reporting by couples in tanzania |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5843259/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29518162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193253 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT halimnafisa variabilityandvalidityofintimatepartnerviolencereportingbycouplesintanzania AT stevenester variabilityandvalidityofintimatepartnerviolencereportingbycouplesintanzania AT reichnaomi variabilityandvalidityofintimatepartnerviolencereportingbycouplesintanzania AT badililian variabilityandvalidityofintimatepartnerviolencereportingbycouplesintanzania AT messersmithlisa variabilityandvalidityofintimatepartnerviolencereportingbycouplesintanzania |