Cargando…

Variability and validity of intimate partner violence reporting by couples in Tanzania

In recent years, major global institutions have amplified their efforts to address intimate partner violence (IPV) against women—a global health and human rights violation affecting 15–71% of reproductive aged women over their lifetimes. Still, some scholars remain concerned about the validity of in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Halim, Nafisa, Steven, Ester, Reich, Naomi, Badi, Lilian, Messersmith, Lisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5843259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29518162
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193253
_version_ 1783305053407281152
author Halim, Nafisa
Steven, Ester
Reich, Naomi
Badi, Lilian
Messersmith, Lisa
author_facet Halim, Nafisa
Steven, Ester
Reich, Naomi
Badi, Lilian
Messersmith, Lisa
author_sort Halim, Nafisa
collection PubMed
description In recent years, major global institutions have amplified their efforts to address intimate partner violence (IPV) against women—a global health and human rights violation affecting 15–71% of reproductive aged women over their lifetimes. Still, some scholars remain concerned about the validity of instruments used for IPV assessment in population-based studies. In this paper, we conducted two validation analyses using novel data from 450 women-men dyads across nine villages in Northern Tanzania. First, we examined the level of inter-partner agreement in reporting of men’s physical, sexual, emotional and economic IPV against women in the last three and twelve months prior to the survey, ever in the relationship, and during pregnancy. Second, we conducted a convergent validity analysis to compare the relative efficacy of men’s self-reports of perpetration and women’s of victimization as a valid indicator of IPV against Tanzanian women using logistic regression models with village-level clustered errors. We found that, for every violence type across the recall periods of the last three months, the last twelve months and ever in the relationship, at least one in three couples disagreed about IPV occurrences in the relationship. Couples’ agreement about physical, sexual and economic IPV during pregnancy was high with 86–93% of couples reporting concordantly. Also, men’s self-reported perpetration had statistically significant associations with at least as many validated risk factors as had women’s self-reported victimization. This finding suggests that men’s self-reports are at least as valid as women’s as an indicator of IPV against women in Northern Tanzania. We recommend more validation studies are conducted in low-income countries, and that data on relationship factors affecting IPV reports and reporting are made available along with data on IPV occurrences. Keywords: Intimate partner violence; measurement; validity; survey research; Tanzania.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5843259
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58432592018-03-23 Variability and validity of intimate partner violence reporting by couples in Tanzania Halim, Nafisa Steven, Ester Reich, Naomi Badi, Lilian Messersmith, Lisa PLoS One Research Article In recent years, major global institutions have amplified their efforts to address intimate partner violence (IPV) against women—a global health and human rights violation affecting 15–71% of reproductive aged women over their lifetimes. Still, some scholars remain concerned about the validity of instruments used for IPV assessment in population-based studies. In this paper, we conducted two validation analyses using novel data from 450 women-men dyads across nine villages in Northern Tanzania. First, we examined the level of inter-partner agreement in reporting of men’s physical, sexual, emotional and economic IPV against women in the last three and twelve months prior to the survey, ever in the relationship, and during pregnancy. Second, we conducted a convergent validity analysis to compare the relative efficacy of men’s self-reports of perpetration and women’s of victimization as a valid indicator of IPV against Tanzanian women using logistic regression models with village-level clustered errors. We found that, for every violence type across the recall periods of the last three months, the last twelve months and ever in the relationship, at least one in three couples disagreed about IPV occurrences in the relationship. Couples’ agreement about physical, sexual and economic IPV during pregnancy was high with 86–93% of couples reporting concordantly. Also, men’s self-reported perpetration had statistically significant associations with at least as many validated risk factors as had women’s self-reported victimization. This finding suggests that men’s self-reports are at least as valid as women’s as an indicator of IPV against women in Northern Tanzania. We recommend more validation studies are conducted in low-income countries, and that data on relationship factors affecting IPV reports and reporting are made available along with data on IPV occurrences. Keywords: Intimate partner violence; measurement; validity; survey research; Tanzania. Public Library of Science 2018-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5843259/ /pubmed/29518162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193253 Text en © 2018 Halim et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Halim, Nafisa
Steven, Ester
Reich, Naomi
Badi, Lilian
Messersmith, Lisa
Variability and validity of intimate partner violence reporting by couples in Tanzania
title Variability and validity of intimate partner violence reporting by couples in Tanzania
title_full Variability and validity of intimate partner violence reporting by couples in Tanzania
title_fullStr Variability and validity of intimate partner violence reporting by couples in Tanzania
title_full_unstemmed Variability and validity of intimate partner violence reporting by couples in Tanzania
title_short Variability and validity of intimate partner violence reporting by couples in Tanzania
title_sort variability and validity of intimate partner violence reporting by couples in tanzania
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5843259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29518162
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193253
work_keys_str_mv AT halimnafisa variabilityandvalidityofintimatepartnerviolencereportingbycouplesintanzania
AT stevenester variabilityandvalidityofintimatepartnerviolencereportingbycouplesintanzania
AT reichnaomi variabilityandvalidityofintimatepartnerviolencereportingbycouplesintanzania
AT badililian variabilityandvalidityofintimatepartnerviolencereportingbycouplesintanzania
AT messersmithlisa variabilityandvalidityofintimatepartnerviolencereportingbycouplesintanzania