Cargando…

Surgical outcome of conjunctival rotational autograft-mitomycin C (MMC) versus free conjunctival autograft-MMC for pterygium removal: A randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Pterygium is a common degenerative eye disease. Despite various surgical methods to treat pterygium, recurrence is the main complication. The main issue is finding a surgical method with the lowest recurrence. OBJECTIVE: to compare the complications, recurrence rate and the cosmetic effe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bamdad, Shahram, Kooshki, Anis Shamsi, Yasemi, Masoud
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Electronic physician 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5843411/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29560137
http://dx.doi.org/10.19082/5877
_version_ 1783305085410869248
author Bamdad, Shahram
Kooshki, Anis Shamsi
Yasemi, Masoud
author_facet Bamdad, Shahram
Kooshki, Anis Shamsi
Yasemi, Masoud
author_sort Bamdad, Shahram
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pterygium is a common degenerative eye disease. Despite various surgical methods to treat pterygium, recurrence is the main complication. The main issue is finding a surgical method with the lowest recurrence. OBJECTIVE: to compare the complications, recurrence rate and the cosmetic effects of two surgical techniques, namely conjunctival rotation autograft (CRA) and conjunctival autograft (CA), in treating pterygium. METHODS: This randomized clinical trial was conducted at Khalili Hospital in Shiraz, Iran, from January to August 2015. Forty-five eyes from 45 patients were studied. The patients were randomly divided into two groups using the blocking method. The patients of one group were operated on by the CRA technique, while the other group was operated on by the CA method. The patients were checked for the recurrence of pterygium, and other complications at the end of the first, third, and sixth month. Finally, the data were analyzed using SPSS version 21. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 42.5 years. The recurrence of pterygium was not observed in any of the patients 6 months after the surgery. Following 6 months after the operation, graft retraction occurred during the first week for one patient (4.5%) in the CA group, and five patients (21.7%) in the CRA group. The prevalence rate of graft injection among the patients of the CA and CRA groups 6 months after the operation was 9.1% and 65.2%, respectively. There was a significant correlation between injection intensity and the dissatisfaction of the patients with the operation’s outcome (p=0.017). CONCLUSION: CRA with mitomycin is considered as an effective method to reduce the recurrence of pterygium after operation. This technique can be used as an acceptable method for pterygium operation, especially for patients with insufficient conjunctiva. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered at the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (http://www.irct.ir) with the Irct ID: IRCT2016092119581N2. FUNDING: The study was financially supported by Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (SUMS) (grants No. 8901).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5843411
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Electronic physician
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58434112018-03-20 Surgical outcome of conjunctival rotational autograft-mitomycin C (MMC) versus free conjunctival autograft-MMC for pterygium removal: A randomized clinical trial Bamdad, Shahram Kooshki, Anis Shamsi Yasemi, Masoud Electron Physician Original Article BACKGROUND: Pterygium is a common degenerative eye disease. Despite various surgical methods to treat pterygium, recurrence is the main complication. The main issue is finding a surgical method with the lowest recurrence. OBJECTIVE: to compare the complications, recurrence rate and the cosmetic effects of two surgical techniques, namely conjunctival rotation autograft (CRA) and conjunctival autograft (CA), in treating pterygium. METHODS: This randomized clinical trial was conducted at Khalili Hospital in Shiraz, Iran, from January to August 2015. Forty-five eyes from 45 patients were studied. The patients were randomly divided into two groups using the blocking method. The patients of one group were operated on by the CRA technique, while the other group was operated on by the CA method. The patients were checked for the recurrence of pterygium, and other complications at the end of the first, third, and sixth month. Finally, the data were analyzed using SPSS version 21. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 42.5 years. The recurrence of pterygium was not observed in any of the patients 6 months after the surgery. Following 6 months after the operation, graft retraction occurred during the first week for one patient (4.5%) in the CA group, and five patients (21.7%) in the CRA group. The prevalence rate of graft injection among the patients of the CA and CRA groups 6 months after the operation was 9.1% and 65.2%, respectively. There was a significant correlation between injection intensity and the dissatisfaction of the patients with the operation’s outcome (p=0.017). CONCLUSION: CRA with mitomycin is considered as an effective method to reduce the recurrence of pterygium after operation. This technique can be used as an acceptable method for pterygium operation, especially for patients with insufficient conjunctiva. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered at the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (http://www.irct.ir) with the Irct ID: IRCT2016092119581N2. FUNDING: The study was financially supported by Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (SUMS) (grants No. 8901). Electronic physician 2017-12-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5843411/ /pubmed/29560137 http://dx.doi.org/10.19082/5877 Text en © 2017 The Authors This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) , which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Bamdad, Shahram
Kooshki, Anis Shamsi
Yasemi, Masoud
Surgical outcome of conjunctival rotational autograft-mitomycin C (MMC) versus free conjunctival autograft-MMC for pterygium removal: A randomized clinical trial
title Surgical outcome of conjunctival rotational autograft-mitomycin C (MMC) versus free conjunctival autograft-MMC for pterygium removal: A randomized clinical trial
title_full Surgical outcome of conjunctival rotational autograft-mitomycin C (MMC) versus free conjunctival autograft-MMC for pterygium removal: A randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr Surgical outcome of conjunctival rotational autograft-mitomycin C (MMC) versus free conjunctival autograft-MMC for pterygium removal: A randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Surgical outcome of conjunctival rotational autograft-mitomycin C (MMC) versus free conjunctival autograft-MMC for pterygium removal: A randomized clinical trial
title_short Surgical outcome of conjunctival rotational autograft-mitomycin C (MMC) versus free conjunctival autograft-MMC for pterygium removal: A randomized clinical trial
title_sort surgical outcome of conjunctival rotational autograft-mitomycin c (mmc) versus free conjunctival autograft-mmc for pterygium removal: a randomized clinical trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5843411/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29560137
http://dx.doi.org/10.19082/5877
work_keys_str_mv AT bamdadshahram surgicaloutcomeofconjunctivalrotationalautograftmitomycincmmcversusfreeconjunctivalautograftmmcforpterygiumremovalarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT kooshkianisshamsi surgicaloutcomeofconjunctivalrotationalautograftmitomycincmmcversusfreeconjunctivalautograftmmcforpterygiumremovalarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT yasemimasoud surgicaloutcomeofconjunctivalrotationalautograftmitomycincmmcversusfreeconjunctivalautograftmmcforpterygiumremovalarandomizedclinicaltrial