Cargando…

Should we still consider clips for basilar apex aneurysms? A critical appraisal of the literature

BACKGROUND: Basilar apex aneurysms constitute 5–8% of all intracranial aneurysms, and their treatment remains challenging for both microsurgical and endovascular approaches. The perceived drawback of the microsurgical approach is its invasiveness leading to increased surgical morbidity. However, man...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tjahjadi, Mardjono, Serrone, Joseph, Hernesniemi, Juha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5843972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29541485
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sni.sni_311_17
_version_ 1783305175756177408
author Tjahjadi, Mardjono
Serrone, Joseph
Hernesniemi, Juha
author_facet Tjahjadi, Mardjono
Serrone, Joseph
Hernesniemi, Juha
author_sort Tjahjadi, Mardjono
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Basilar apex aneurysms constitute 5–8% of all intracranial aneurysms, and their treatment remains challenging for both microsurgical and endovascular approaches. The perceived drawback of the microsurgical approach is its invasiveness leading to increased surgical morbidity. However, many high-volume centers have shown excellent clinical results with better occlusion rates compared to endovascular treatment. With endovascular therapy taking a larger role in the management of cerebral aneurysms, the future role of microsurgery for basilar apex aneurysm treatment is unclear. METHODS: We performed a literature search to review the microsurgical and endovascular outcomes for basilar apex aneurysms. RESULTS: Many studies have examined the efficacy of microsurgical and endovascular treatment for intracranial aneurysms, including large randomized trials such as ISAT and BRAT, prospective observational series such as ISUIA, and many single-center retrospective reviews. The recruitment number for posterior circulation aneurysms, specifically for basilar apex aneurysms, was limited in most prospective trials, thus failing to offer clear guidance on basilar apex aneurysm treatment. Recent single-center series report good clinical outcomes between 57–92% for surgical series and 73–96% in endovascular series. The durability of aneurysm occlusion remains superior in surgical cases. The techniques and devices in endovascular treatment have improved treatment aneurysm occlusion rates but more follow-up is needed to confirm long-term durability. CONCLUSIONS: Both microsurgical and endovascular approaches should be complementing each other to treat basilar apex aneurysms. Although endovascular therapy has taken a larger role in the treatment of basilar apex aneurysms, many indications still exist for the use of microsurgery. Advancements in microsurgical techniques and good case selection will allow for acceptably low morbidity after surgical treatment while maintaining its superior durability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5843972
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58439722018-03-14 Should we still consider clips for basilar apex aneurysms? A critical appraisal of the literature Tjahjadi, Mardjono Serrone, Joseph Hernesniemi, Juha Surg Neurol Int Neurovascular: Review Article BACKGROUND: Basilar apex aneurysms constitute 5–8% of all intracranial aneurysms, and their treatment remains challenging for both microsurgical and endovascular approaches. The perceived drawback of the microsurgical approach is its invasiveness leading to increased surgical morbidity. However, many high-volume centers have shown excellent clinical results with better occlusion rates compared to endovascular treatment. With endovascular therapy taking a larger role in the management of cerebral aneurysms, the future role of microsurgery for basilar apex aneurysm treatment is unclear. METHODS: We performed a literature search to review the microsurgical and endovascular outcomes for basilar apex aneurysms. RESULTS: Many studies have examined the efficacy of microsurgical and endovascular treatment for intracranial aneurysms, including large randomized trials such as ISAT and BRAT, prospective observational series such as ISUIA, and many single-center retrospective reviews. The recruitment number for posterior circulation aneurysms, specifically for basilar apex aneurysms, was limited in most prospective trials, thus failing to offer clear guidance on basilar apex aneurysm treatment. Recent single-center series report good clinical outcomes between 57–92% for surgical series and 73–96% in endovascular series. The durability of aneurysm occlusion remains superior in surgical cases. The techniques and devices in endovascular treatment have improved treatment aneurysm occlusion rates but more follow-up is needed to confirm long-term durability. CONCLUSIONS: Both microsurgical and endovascular approaches should be complementing each other to treat basilar apex aneurysms. Although endovascular therapy has taken a larger role in the treatment of basilar apex aneurysms, many indications still exist for the use of microsurgery. Advancements in microsurgical techniques and good case selection will allow for acceptably low morbidity after surgical treatment while maintaining its superior durability. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5843972/ /pubmed/29541485 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sni.sni_311_17 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Surgical Neurology International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Neurovascular: Review Article
Tjahjadi, Mardjono
Serrone, Joseph
Hernesniemi, Juha
Should we still consider clips for basilar apex aneurysms? A critical appraisal of the literature
title Should we still consider clips for basilar apex aneurysms? A critical appraisal of the literature
title_full Should we still consider clips for basilar apex aneurysms? A critical appraisal of the literature
title_fullStr Should we still consider clips for basilar apex aneurysms? A critical appraisal of the literature
title_full_unstemmed Should we still consider clips for basilar apex aneurysms? A critical appraisal of the literature
title_short Should we still consider clips for basilar apex aneurysms? A critical appraisal of the literature
title_sort should we still consider clips for basilar apex aneurysms? a critical appraisal of the literature
topic Neurovascular: Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5843972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29541485
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sni.sni_311_17
work_keys_str_mv AT tjahjadimardjono shouldwestillconsiderclipsforbasilarapexaneurysmsacriticalappraisaloftheliterature
AT serronejoseph shouldwestillconsiderclipsforbasilarapexaneurysmsacriticalappraisaloftheliterature
AT hernesniemijuha shouldwestillconsiderclipsforbasilarapexaneurysmsacriticalappraisaloftheliterature