Cargando…
Ethnicity and Language Proficiency Differences in the Provision of and Intention to Use Prenatal Screening for Down’s Syndrome and Congenital Anomalies. A Prospective, Non-selected, Register-Based Study in the Netherlands
Objective We aimed to conduct an analysis of the associations between the information provision procedure of prenatal screening for Down’s syndrome and congenital anomalies and the intention to participate in prenatal screening (PS) of ethnicity groups and Dutch language proficiency groups. Design U...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5845051/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28884405 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10995-017-2364-2 |
_version_ | 1783305343236833280 |
---|---|
author | Peters, Ingrid A. Heetkamp, Kirsten M. Ursem, Nicolette T. C. Steegers, Eric A. P. Denktaş, Semiha Knapen, Maarten F. C. M. |
author_facet | Peters, Ingrid A. Heetkamp, Kirsten M. Ursem, Nicolette T. C. Steegers, Eric A. P. Denktaş, Semiha Knapen, Maarten F. C. M. |
author_sort | Peters, Ingrid A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective We aimed to conduct an analysis of the associations between the information provision procedure of prenatal screening for Down’s syndrome and congenital anomalies and the intention to participate in prenatal screening (PS) of ethnicity groups and Dutch language proficiency groups. Design Using a prospective web-based registration form, we asked counselors (midwives, general practitioners, nurses and gynecologists) to report whether and how they offered information about PS to pregnant women. Duration The study was conducted from 2008 to 2010. Participants We collected data on the characteristics of the women who received an information offer about PS from counselors. Measurements Measures included socio-demographic and language proficiency level (LPL) characteristics, key elements of the provision procedure of PS, and intentional participation in PS. Findings The dataset represents 37% of the total population in the study area. Women with a non-native Dutch background and/or insufficient Dutch LPL received fewer information offers about PS, faced a reduced chance of receiving counseling, and showed lower intentional participation rates for PS. Key Conclusions Women with a non-native Dutch background and/or with an insufficient LPL are underserved in the Dutch PS program. These findings present evidence indicating that the fundamental principle of the Dutch Population Screening Act, namely, equal access to PS for all pregnant women, is not being realized. Implications for Practice Therefore, the study findings are important for national and international healthcare, policy makers and governmental professionals to allow ethnic and LPL-related differences in the provision and intentional uptake of PS. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10995-017-2364-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5845051 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58450512018-03-19 Ethnicity and Language Proficiency Differences in the Provision of and Intention to Use Prenatal Screening for Down’s Syndrome and Congenital Anomalies. A Prospective, Non-selected, Register-Based Study in the Netherlands Peters, Ingrid A. Heetkamp, Kirsten M. Ursem, Nicolette T. C. Steegers, Eric A. P. Denktaş, Semiha Knapen, Maarten F. C. M. Matern Child Health J Article Objective We aimed to conduct an analysis of the associations between the information provision procedure of prenatal screening for Down’s syndrome and congenital anomalies and the intention to participate in prenatal screening (PS) of ethnicity groups and Dutch language proficiency groups. Design Using a prospective web-based registration form, we asked counselors (midwives, general practitioners, nurses and gynecologists) to report whether and how they offered information about PS to pregnant women. Duration The study was conducted from 2008 to 2010. Participants We collected data on the characteristics of the women who received an information offer about PS from counselors. Measurements Measures included socio-demographic and language proficiency level (LPL) characteristics, key elements of the provision procedure of PS, and intentional participation in PS. Findings The dataset represents 37% of the total population in the study area. Women with a non-native Dutch background and/or insufficient Dutch LPL received fewer information offers about PS, faced a reduced chance of receiving counseling, and showed lower intentional participation rates for PS. Key Conclusions Women with a non-native Dutch background and/or with an insufficient LPL are underserved in the Dutch PS program. These findings present evidence indicating that the fundamental principle of the Dutch Population Screening Act, namely, equal access to PS for all pregnant women, is not being realized. Implications for Practice Therefore, the study findings are important for national and international healthcare, policy makers and governmental professionals to allow ethnic and LPL-related differences in the provision and intentional uptake of PS. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10995-017-2364-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2017-09-07 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5845051/ /pubmed/28884405 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10995-017-2364-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Article Peters, Ingrid A. Heetkamp, Kirsten M. Ursem, Nicolette T. C. Steegers, Eric A. P. Denktaş, Semiha Knapen, Maarten F. C. M. Ethnicity and Language Proficiency Differences in the Provision of and Intention to Use Prenatal Screening for Down’s Syndrome and Congenital Anomalies. A Prospective, Non-selected, Register-Based Study in the Netherlands |
title | Ethnicity and Language Proficiency Differences in the Provision of and Intention to Use Prenatal Screening for Down’s Syndrome and Congenital Anomalies. A Prospective, Non-selected, Register-Based Study in the Netherlands |
title_full | Ethnicity and Language Proficiency Differences in the Provision of and Intention to Use Prenatal Screening for Down’s Syndrome and Congenital Anomalies. A Prospective, Non-selected, Register-Based Study in the Netherlands |
title_fullStr | Ethnicity and Language Proficiency Differences in the Provision of and Intention to Use Prenatal Screening for Down’s Syndrome and Congenital Anomalies. A Prospective, Non-selected, Register-Based Study in the Netherlands |
title_full_unstemmed | Ethnicity and Language Proficiency Differences in the Provision of and Intention to Use Prenatal Screening for Down’s Syndrome and Congenital Anomalies. A Prospective, Non-selected, Register-Based Study in the Netherlands |
title_short | Ethnicity and Language Proficiency Differences in the Provision of and Intention to Use Prenatal Screening for Down’s Syndrome and Congenital Anomalies. A Prospective, Non-selected, Register-Based Study in the Netherlands |
title_sort | ethnicity and language proficiency differences in the provision of and intention to use prenatal screening for down’s syndrome and congenital anomalies. a prospective, non-selected, register-based study in the netherlands |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5845051/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28884405 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10995-017-2364-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT petersingrida ethnicityandlanguageproficiencydifferencesintheprovisionofandintentiontouseprenatalscreeningfordownssyndromeandcongenitalanomaliesaprospectivenonselectedregisterbasedstudyinthenetherlands AT heetkampkirstenm ethnicityandlanguageproficiencydifferencesintheprovisionofandintentiontouseprenatalscreeningfordownssyndromeandcongenitalanomaliesaprospectivenonselectedregisterbasedstudyinthenetherlands AT ursemnicolettetc ethnicityandlanguageproficiencydifferencesintheprovisionofandintentiontouseprenatalscreeningfordownssyndromeandcongenitalanomaliesaprospectivenonselectedregisterbasedstudyinthenetherlands AT steegersericap ethnicityandlanguageproficiencydifferencesintheprovisionofandintentiontouseprenatalscreeningfordownssyndromeandcongenitalanomaliesaprospectivenonselectedregisterbasedstudyinthenetherlands AT denktassemiha ethnicityandlanguageproficiencydifferencesintheprovisionofandintentiontouseprenatalscreeningfordownssyndromeandcongenitalanomaliesaprospectivenonselectedregisterbasedstudyinthenetherlands AT knapenmaartenfcm ethnicityandlanguageproficiencydifferencesintheprovisionofandintentiontouseprenatalscreeningfordownssyndromeandcongenitalanomaliesaprospectivenonselectedregisterbasedstudyinthenetherlands |