Cargando…
Characterizing and Managing Missing Structured Data in Electronic Health Records: Data Analysis
BACKGROUND: Missing data is a challenge for all studies; however, this is especially true for electronic health record (EHR)-based analyses. Failure to appropriately consider missing data can lead to biased results. While there has been extensive theoretical work on imputation, and many sophisticate...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5845101/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29475824 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/medinform.8960 |
_version_ | 1783305354896998400 |
---|---|
author | Beaulieu-Jones, Brett K Lavage, Daniel R Snyder, John W Moore, Jason H Pendergrass, Sarah A Bauer, Christopher R |
author_facet | Beaulieu-Jones, Brett K Lavage, Daniel R Snyder, John W Moore, Jason H Pendergrass, Sarah A Bauer, Christopher R |
author_sort | Beaulieu-Jones, Brett K |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Missing data is a challenge for all studies; however, this is especially true for electronic health record (EHR)-based analyses. Failure to appropriately consider missing data can lead to biased results. While there has been extensive theoretical work on imputation, and many sophisticated methods are now available, it remains quite challenging for researchers to implement these methods appropriately. Here, we provide detailed procedures for when and how to conduct imputation of EHR laboratory results. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to demonstrate how the mechanism of missingness can be assessed, evaluate the performance of a variety of imputation methods, and describe some of the most frequent problems that can be encountered. METHODS: We analyzed clinical laboratory measures from 602,366 patients in the EHR of Geisinger Health System in Pennsylvania, USA. Using these data, we constructed a representative set of complete cases and assessed the performance of 12 different imputation methods for missing data that was simulated based on 4 mechanisms of missingness (missing completely at random, missing not at random, missing at random, and real data modelling). RESULTS: Our results showed that several methods, including variations of Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations (MICE) and softImpute, consistently imputed missing values with low error; however, only a subset of the MICE methods was suitable for multiple imputation. CONCLUSIONS: The analyses we describe provide an outline of considerations for dealing with missing EHR data, steps that researchers can perform to characterize missingness within their own data, and an evaluation of methods that can be applied to impute clinical data. While the performance of methods may vary between datasets, the process we describe can be generalized to the majority of structured data types that exist in EHRs, and all of our methods and code are publicly available. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5845101 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58451012018-03-19 Characterizing and Managing Missing Structured Data in Electronic Health Records: Data Analysis Beaulieu-Jones, Brett K Lavage, Daniel R Snyder, John W Moore, Jason H Pendergrass, Sarah A Bauer, Christopher R JMIR Med Inform Original Paper BACKGROUND: Missing data is a challenge for all studies; however, this is especially true for electronic health record (EHR)-based analyses. Failure to appropriately consider missing data can lead to biased results. While there has been extensive theoretical work on imputation, and many sophisticated methods are now available, it remains quite challenging for researchers to implement these methods appropriately. Here, we provide detailed procedures for when and how to conduct imputation of EHR laboratory results. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to demonstrate how the mechanism of missingness can be assessed, evaluate the performance of a variety of imputation methods, and describe some of the most frequent problems that can be encountered. METHODS: We analyzed clinical laboratory measures from 602,366 patients in the EHR of Geisinger Health System in Pennsylvania, USA. Using these data, we constructed a representative set of complete cases and assessed the performance of 12 different imputation methods for missing data that was simulated based on 4 mechanisms of missingness (missing completely at random, missing not at random, missing at random, and real data modelling). RESULTS: Our results showed that several methods, including variations of Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations (MICE) and softImpute, consistently imputed missing values with low error; however, only a subset of the MICE methods was suitable for multiple imputation. CONCLUSIONS: The analyses we describe provide an outline of considerations for dealing with missing EHR data, steps that researchers can perform to characterize missingness within their own data, and an evaluation of methods that can be applied to impute clinical data. While the performance of methods may vary between datasets, the process we describe can be generalized to the majority of structured data types that exist in EHRs, and all of our methods and code are publicly available. JMIR Publications 2018-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5845101/ /pubmed/29475824 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/medinform.8960 Text en ©Brett K Beaulieu-Jones, Daniel R Lavage, John W Snyder, Jason H Moore, Sarah A Pendergrass, Christopher R Bauer. Originally published in JMIR Medical Informatics (http://medinform.jmir.org), 23.02.2018. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Medical Informatics, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://medinform.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Beaulieu-Jones, Brett K Lavage, Daniel R Snyder, John W Moore, Jason H Pendergrass, Sarah A Bauer, Christopher R Characterizing and Managing Missing Structured Data in Electronic Health Records: Data Analysis |
title | Characterizing and Managing Missing Structured Data in Electronic Health Records: Data Analysis |
title_full | Characterizing and Managing Missing Structured Data in Electronic Health Records: Data Analysis |
title_fullStr | Characterizing and Managing Missing Structured Data in Electronic Health Records: Data Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Characterizing and Managing Missing Structured Data in Electronic Health Records: Data Analysis |
title_short | Characterizing and Managing Missing Structured Data in Electronic Health Records: Data Analysis |
title_sort | characterizing and managing missing structured data in electronic health records: data analysis |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5845101/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29475824 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/medinform.8960 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT beaulieujonesbrettk characterizingandmanagingmissingstructureddatainelectronichealthrecordsdataanalysis AT lavagedanielr characterizingandmanagingmissingstructureddatainelectronichealthrecordsdataanalysis AT snyderjohnw characterizingandmanagingmissingstructureddatainelectronichealthrecordsdataanalysis AT moorejasonh characterizingandmanagingmissingstructureddatainelectronichealthrecordsdataanalysis AT pendergrasssaraha characterizingandmanagingmissingstructureddatainelectronichealthrecordsdataanalysis AT bauerchristopherr characterizingandmanagingmissingstructureddatainelectronichealthrecordsdataanalysis |