Cargando…
Cost-effectiveness in extracorporeal life support in critically ill adults in the Netherlands
BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) is used to support the cardiorespiratory function in case of severe cardiac and/or respiratory failure in critically ill patients. According to the ELSO guidelines ECLS should be considered when estimated mortality risk approximates 80%. ECLS seems an e...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5845153/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29523153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-2964-6 |
_version_ | 1783305367207280640 |
---|---|
author | Oude Lansink-Hartgring, Annemieke Dos Reis Miranda, Dinis Donker, Dirk W. Maas, Jacinta J. Delnoij, Thijs Kuijpers, Marijn van den Brule, Judith Scholten, Erik Endeman, Hendrik Vlaar, Alexander P. J. van den Bergh, Walter M. |
author_facet | Oude Lansink-Hartgring, Annemieke Dos Reis Miranda, Dinis Donker, Dirk W. Maas, Jacinta J. Delnoij, Thijs Kuijpers, Marijn van den Brule, Judith Scholten, Erik Endeman, Hendrik Vlaar, Alexander P. J. van den Bergh, Walter M. |
author_sort | Oude Lansink-Hartgring, Annemieke |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) is used to support the cardiorespiratory function in case of severe cardiac and/or respiratory failure in critically ill patients. According to the ELSO guidelines ECLS should be considered when estimated mortality risk approximates 80%. ECLS seems an efficient therapy in terms of survival benefit, but no undisputed evidence is delivered yet. The aim of the study is to assess the health-related quality of life after ECLS treatment and its cost effectiveness. METHODS: We will perform a prospective observational cohort study. All adult patients who receive ECLS in the participating centers will be included. Exclusion criteria are patients in whom the ECLS is only used to bridge a procedure (like a high risk percutaneous coronary intervention or surgery) or the absence of informed consent. Data collection includes patient characteristics and data specific for ECLS treatment. Severity of illness and mortality risk is measured as precisely as possible using measurements for the appropriate age group and organ failure. For analyses on survival patients will act as their own control as we compare the actual survival with the estimated mortality on initiation of ECLS if conservative treatment would have been continued. Survivors are asked to complete validated questionnaires on health related quality of life (EQ5D-5 L) and on medical consumption and productivity losses (iMTA/iPCQ) at 6 and 12 months. Also the health related quality of life 1 month prior to ECLS initiation will be obtained by a questionnaire, if needed provided by relatives. With an estimated overall survival of 62% 210 patients need to be recruited to make a statement on cost effectiveness for all ECLS indications. DISCUSSION: If our hypothesis that ECLS treatment is cost-effective is confirmed by this prospective study this could lead to an even broader use of ECLS treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered at (NCT02837419) registration date July 19, 2016 and with the Dutch trial register, http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=6599 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5845153 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58451532018-03-14 Cost-effectiveness in extracorporeal life support in critically ill adults in the Netherlands Oude Lansink-Hartgring, Annemieke Dos Reis Miranda, Dinis Donker, Dirk W. Maas, Jacinta J. Delnoij, Thijs Kuijpers, Marijn van den Brule, Judith Scholten, Erik Endeman, Hendrik Vlaar, Alexander P. J. van den Bergh, Walter M. BMC Health Serv Res Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) is used to support the cardiorespiratory function in case of severe cardiac and/or respiratory failure in critically ill patients. According to the ELSO guidelines ECLS should be considered when estimated mortality risk approximates 80%. ECLS seems an efficient therapy in terms of survival benefit, but no undisputed evidence is delivered yet. The aim of the study is to assess the health-related quality of life after ECLS treatment and its cost effectiveness. METHODS: We will perform a prospective observational cohort study. All adult patients who receive ECLS in the participating centers will be included. Exclusion criteria are patients in whom the ECLS is only used to bridge a procedure (like a high risk percutaneous coronary intervention or surgery) or the absence of informed consent. Data collection includes patient characteristics and data specific for ECLS treatment. Severity of illness and mortality risk is measured as precisely as possible using measurements for the appropriate age group and organ failure. For analyses on survival patients will act as their own control as we compare the actual survival with the estimated mortality on initiation of ECLS if conservative treatment would have been continued. Survivors are asked to complete validated questionnaires on health related quality of life (EQ5D-5 L) and on medical consumption and productivity losses (iMTA/iPCQ) at 6 and 12 months. Also the health related quality of life 1 month prior to ECLS initiation will be obtained by a questionnaire, if needed provided by relatives. With an estimated overall survival of 62% 210 patients need to be recruited to make a statement on cost effectiveness for all ECLS indications. DISCUSSION: If our hypothesis that ECLS treatment is cost-effective is confirmed by this prospective study this could lead to an even broader use of ECLS treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered at (NCT02837419) registration date July 19, 2016 and with the Dutch trial register, http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=6599 BioMed Central 2018-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5845153/ /pubmed/29523153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-2964-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Oude Lansink-Hartgring, Annemieke Dos Reis Miranda, Dinis Donker, Dirk W. Maas, Jacinta J. Delnoij, Thijs Kuijpers, Marijn van den Brule, Judith Scholten, Erik Endeman, Hendrik Vlaar, Alexander P. J. van den Bergh, Walter M. Cost-effectiveness in extracorporeal life support in critically ill adults in the Netherlands |
title | Cost-effectiveness in extracorporeal life support in critically ill adults in the Netherlands |
title_full | Cost-effectiveness in extracorporeal life support in critically ill adults in the Netherlands |
title_fullStr | Cost-effectiveness in extracorporeal life support in critically ill adults in the Netherlands |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost-effectiveness in extracorporeal life support in critically ill adults in the Netherlands |
title_short | Cost-effectiveness in extracorporeal life support in critically ill adults in the Netherlands |
title_sort | cost-effectiveness in extracorporeal life support in critically ill adults in the netherlands |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5845153/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29523153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-2964-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oudelansinkhartgringannemieke costeffectivenessinextracorporeallifesupportincriticallyilladultsinthenetherlands AT dosreismirandadinis costeffectivenessinextracorporeallifesupportincriticallyilladultsinthenetherlands AT donkerdirkw costeffectivenessinextracorporeallifesupportincriticallyilladultsinthenetherlands AT maasjacintaj costeffectivenessinextracorporeallifesupportincriticallyilladultsinthenetherlands AT delnoijthijs costeffectivenessinextracorporeallifesupportincriticallyilladultsinthenetherlands AT kuijpersmarijn costeffectivenessinextracorporeallifesupportincriticallyilladultsinthenetherlands AT vandenbrulejudith costeffectivenessinextracorporeallifesupportincriticallyilladultsinthenetherlands AT scholtenerik costeffectivenessinextracorporeallifesupportincriticallyilladultsinthenetherlands AT endemanhendrik costeffectivenessinextracorporeallifesupportincriticallyilladultsinthenetherlands AT vlaaralexanderpj costeffectivenessinextracorporeallifesupportincriticallyilladultsinthenetherlands AT vandenberghwalterm costeffectivenessinextracorporeallifesupportincriticallyilladultsinthenetherlands AT costeffectivenessinextracorporeallifesupportincriticallyilladultsinthenetherlands |