Cargando…

Individualized controlled ovarian stimulation in expected poor-responders: an update

Controlled ovarian stimulation with subsequent multi-follicular development continues to be a keystone in ART. Evidence supports an individualized approach to ovarian stimulation, usually involving combinations of ovarian reserve tests, body mass index and age to tailor the exogenous gonadotropin do...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haahr, Thor, Esteves, Sandro C., Humaidan, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5845159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29523204
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-018-0342-1
_version_ 1783305368627052544
author Haahr, Thor
Esteves, Sandro C.
Humaidan, Peter
author_facet Haahr, Thor
Esteves, Sandro C.
Humaidan, Peter
author_sort Haahr, Thor
collection PubMed
description Controlled ovarian stimulation with subsequent multi-follicular development continues to be a keystone in ART. Evidence supports an individualized approach to ovarian stimulation, usually involving combinations of ovarian reserve tests, body mass index and age to tailor the exogenous gonadotropin dose, and potentially adjuvant treatment aiming for high safety and a shortening of time to live birth. While stimulation and trigger concepts have been developed successfully in normo- and hyperresponder patients, the poor responder patient remains difficult to manage. However, recent advances in definition and classification of the expected poor ovarian responder patient might enable a more accurate and clinically useful interpretation of new treatment concepts in a more homogenous study population. In the present review, we discuss the classification of the expected poor ovarian responder patient as well as clinically useful measurements of efficacy for controlled ovarian stimulation, and finally, we discuss the evidence for clinical management of patients with expected poor ovarian response, including adjuvant treatments such as growth hormone, androgens, and LH activity. In conclusion, the best available evidence supports that the treatment of the expected poor ovarian response patient should be individualized in all steps of ART, including the choice of GnRH analogue, the gonadotropin type and dose, ovulation trigger, and the possible use of adjuvant therapies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5845159
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58451592018-03-14 Individualized controlled ovarian stimulation in expected poor-responders: an update Haahr, Thor Esteves, Sandro C. Humaidan, Peter Reprod Biol Endocrinol Review Controlled ovarian stimulation with subsequent multi-follicular development continues to be a keystone in ART. Evidence supports an individualized approach to ovarian stimulation, usually involving combinations of ovarian reserve tests, body mass index and age to tailor the exogenous gonadotropin dose, and potentially adjuvant treatment aiming for high safety and a shortening of time to live birth. While stimulation and trigger concepts have been developed successfully in normo- and hyperresponder patients, the poor responder patient remains difficult to manage. However, recent advances in definition and classification of the expected poor ovarian responder patient might enable a more accurate and clinically useful interpretation of new treatment concepts in a more homogenous study population. In the present review, we discuss the classification of the expected poor ovarian responder patient as well as clinically useful measurements of efficacy for controlled ovarian stimulation, and finally, we discuss the evidence for clinical management of patients with expected poor ovarian response, including adjuvant treatments such as growth hormone, androgens, and LH activity. In conclusion, the best available evidence supports that the treatment of the expected poor ovarian response patient should be individualized in all steps of ART, including the choice of GnRH analogue, the gonadotropin type and dose, ovulation trigger, and the possible use of adjuvant therapies. BioMed Central 2018-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5845159/ /pubmed/29523204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-018-0342-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Haahr, Thor
Esteves, Sandro C.
Humaidan, Peter
Individualized controlled ovarian stimulation in expected poor-responders: an update
title Individualized controlled ovarian stimulation in expected poor-responders: an update
title_full Individualized controlled ovarian stimulation in expected poor-responders: an update
title_fullStr Individualized controlled ovarian stimulation in expected poor-responders: an update
title_full_unstemmed Individualized controlled ovarian stimulation in expected poor-responders: an update
title_short Individualized controlled ovarian stimulation in expected poor-responders: an update
title_sort individualized controlled ovarian stimulation in expected poor-responders: an update
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5845159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29523204
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-018-0342-1
work_keys_str_mv AT haahrthor individualizedcontrolledovarianstimulationinexpectedpoorrespondersanupdate
AT estevessandroc individualizedcontrolledovarianstimulationinexpectedpoorrespondersanupdate
AT humaidanpeter individualizedcontrolledovarianstimulationinexpectedpoorrespondersanupdate