Cargando…
Preventing cervical cancer using HPV self-sampling: direct mailing of test-kits increases screening participation more than timely opt-in procedures - a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer screening participation remains insufficient in most countries. Our aim was to evaluate whether offering a HPV self-sampling kit, either mailed directly to the woman’s home or using timely opt-in procedures for ordering the kit, increased screening participation compared...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5845195/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29523108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4165-4 |
_version_ | 1783305377204404224 |
---|---|
author | Tranberg, Mette Bech, Bodil Hammer Blaakær, Jan Jensen, Jørgen Skov Svanholm, Hans Andersen, Berit |
author_facet | Tranberg, Mette Bech, Bodil Hammer Blaakær, Jan Jensen, Jørgen Skov Svanholm, Hans Andersen, Berit |
author_sort | Tranberg, Mette |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer screening participation remains insufficient in most countries. Our aim was to evaluate whether offering a HPV self-sampling kit, either mailed directly to the woman’s home or using timely opt-in procedures for ordering the kit, increased screening participation compared with a standard second reminder. METHODS: In this randomized, controlled effectiveness trial, 9791 Danish women aged 30–64 who were due to receive the second reminder were equally randomized to either: 1) direct mailing of a second reminder and a self-sampling kit (directly mailed group); 2) mailing of a second reminder that offered a self-sampling kit to be ordered by e-mail, text message, phone, or webpage (opt-in group); or 3) mailing of a second reminder to attend regular cytology screening (control group). In an intention-to-treat analysis, we estimated the participation rate at 180 days post intervention, by returning a self-sample or attending regular cytology screening. We calculated the proportion of women with a positive HPV self-sample who attended for cervical cytology triage at the general practitioner within 90 days. RESULTS: Participation was significantly higher in the directly mailed group (38.0%) and in the opt-in group (30.9%) than in the control group (25.2%) (participation difference (PD): 12.8%, 95% CI: 10.6–15.0% and PD: 5.7%, 95% CI: 3.5–7.9%, respectively). Within 90 days, 107 women (90.7%, 95% CI: 83.9–95.3%) with a HPV-positive self-sample attended follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Offering the opportunity of HPV self-sampling as an alternative to regular cytology screening increased participation; the direct mailing strategy was the most effective invitation strategy. A high compliance with follow-up was seen. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials NCT02680262. Registered 10 February 2016. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5845195 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58451952018-03-14 Preventing cervical cancer using HPV self-sampling: direct mailing of test-kits increases screening participation more than timely opt-in procedures - a randomized controlled trial Tranberg, Mette Bech, Bodil Hammer Blaakær, Jan Jensen, Jørgen Skov Svanholm, Hans Andersen, Berit BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer screening participation remains insufficient in most countries. Our aim was to evaluate whether offering a HPV self-sampling kit, either mailed directly to the woman’s home or using timely opt-in procedures for ordering the kit, increased screening participation compared with a standard second reminder. METHODS: In this randomized, controlled effectiveness trial, 9791 Danish women aged 30–64 who were due to receive the second reminder were equally randomized to either: 1) direct mailing of a second reminder and a self-sampling kit (directly mailed group); 2) mailing of a second reminder that offered a self-sampling kit to be ordered by e-mail, text message, phone, or webpage (opt-in group); or 3) mailing of a second reminder to attend regular cytology screening (control group). In an intention-to-treat analysis, we estimated the participation rate at 180 days post intervention, by returning a self-sample or attending regular cytology screening. We calculated the proportion of women with a positive HPV self-sample who attended for cervical cytology triage at the general practitioner within 90 days. RESULTS: Participation was significantly higher in the directly mailed group (38.0%) and in the opt-in group (30.9%) than in the control group (25.2%) (participation difference (PD): 12.8%, 95% CI: 10.6–15.0% and PD: 5.7%, 95% CI: 3.5–7.9%, respectively). Within 90 days, 107 women (90.7%, 95% CI: 83.9–95.3%) with a HPV-positive self-sample attended follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Offering the opportunity of HPV self-sampling as an alternative to regular cytology screening increased participation; the direct mailing strategy was the most effective invitation strategy. A high compliance with follow-up was seen. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials NCT02680262. Registered 10 February 2016. BioMed Central 2018-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5845195/ /pubmed/29523108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4165-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Tranberg, Mette Bech, Bodil Hammer Blaakær, Jan Jensen, Jørgen Skov Svanholm, Hans Andersen, Berit Preventing cervical cancer using HPV self-sampling: direct mailing of test-kits increases screening participation more than timely opt-in procedures - a randomized controlled trial |
title | Preventing cervical cancer using HPV self-sampling: direct mailing of test-kits increases screening participation more than timely opt-in procedures - a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Preventing cervical cancer using HPV self-sampling: direct mailing of test-kits increases screening participation more than timely opt-in procedures - a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Preventing cervical cancer using HPV self-sampling: direct mailing of test-kits increases screening participation more than timely opt-in procedures - a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Preventing cervical cancer using HPV self-sampling: direct mailing of test-kits increases screening participation more than timely opt-in procedures - a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Preventing cervical cancer using HPV self-sampling: direct mailing of test-kits increases screening participation more than timely opt-in procedures - a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | preventing cervical cancer using hpv self-sampling: direct mailing of test-kits increases screening participation more than timely opt-in procedures - a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5845195/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29523108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4165-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tranbergmette preventingcervicalcancerusinghpvselfsamplingdirectmailingoftestkitsincreasesscreeningparticipationmorethantimelyoptinproceduresarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT bechbodilhammer preventingcervicalcancerusinghpvselfsamplingdirectmailingoftestkitsincreasesscreeningparticipationmorethantimelyoptinproceduresarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT blaakærjan preventingcervicalcancerusinghpvselfsamplingdirectmailingoftestkitsincreasesscreeningparticipationmorethantimelyoptinproceduresarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT jensenjørgenskov preventingcervicalcancerusinghpvselfsamplingdirectmailingoftestkitsincreasesscreeningparticipationmorethantimelyoptinproceduresarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT svanholmhans preventingcervicalcancerusinghpvselfsamplingdirectmailingoftestkitsincreasesscreeningparticipationmorethantimelyoptinproceduresarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT andersenberit preventingcervicalcancerusinghpvselfsamplingdirectmailingoftestkitsincreasesscreeningparticipationmorethantimelyoptinproceduresarandomizedcontrolledtrial |