Cargando…

Preventing cervical cancer using HPV self-sampling: direct mailing of test-kits increases screening participation more than timely opt-in procedures - a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer screening participation remains insufficient in most countries. Our aim was to evaluate whether offering a HPV self-sampling kit, either mailed directly to the woman’s home or using timely opt-in procedures for ordering the kit, increased screening participation compared...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tranberg, Mette, Bech, Bodil Hammer, Blaakær, Jan, Jensen, Jørgen Skov, Svanholm, Hans, Andersen, Berit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5845195/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29523108
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4165-4
_version_ 1783305377204404224
author Tranberg, Mette
Bech, Bodil Hammer
Blaakær, Jan
Jensen, Jørgen Skov
Svanholm, Hans
Andersen, Berit
author_facet Tranberg, Mette
Bech, Bodil Hammer
Blaakær, Jan
Jensen, Jørgen Skov
Svanholm, Hans
Andersen, Berit
author_sort Tranberg, Mette
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer screening participation remains insufficient in most countries. Our aim was to evaluate whether offering a HPV self-sampling kit, either mailed directly to the woman’s home or using timely opt-in procedures for ordering the kit, increased screening participation compared with a standard second reminder. METHODS: In this randomized, controlled effectiveness trial, 9791 Danish women aged 30–64 who were due to receive the second reminder were equally randomized to either: 1) direct mailing of a second reminder and a self-sampling kit (directly mailed group); 2) mailing of a second reminder that offered a self-sampling kit to be ordered by e-mail, text message, phone, or webpage (opt-in group); or 3) mailing of a second reminder to attend regular cytology screening (control group). In an intention-to-treat analysis, we estimated the participation rate at 180 days post intervention, by returning a self-sample or attending regular cytology screening. We calculated the proportion of women with a positive HPV self-sample who attended for cervical cytology triage at the general practitioner within 90 days. RESULTS: Participation was significantly higher in the directly mailed group (38.0%) and in the opt-in group (30.9%) than in the control group (25.2%) (participation difference (PD): 12.8%, 95% CI: 10.6–15.0% and PD: 5.7%, 95% CI: 3.5–7.9%, respectively). Within 90 days, 107 women (90.7%, 95% CI: 83.9–95.3%) with a HPV-positive self-sample attended follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Offering the opportunity of HPV self-sampling as an alternative to regular cytology screening increased participation; the direct mailing strategy was the most effective invitation strategy. A high compliance with follow-up was seen. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials NCT02680262. Registered 10 February 2016.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5845195
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58451952018-03-14 Preventing cervical cancer using HPV self-sampling: direct mailing of test-kits increases screening participation more than timely opt-in procedures - a randomized controlled trial Tranberg, Mette Bech, Bodil Hammer Blaakær, Jan Jensen, Jørgen Skov Svanholm, Hans Andersen, Berit BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer screening participation remains insufficient in most countries. Our aim was to evaluate whether offering a HPV self-sampling kit, either mailed directly to the woman’s home or using timely opt-in procedures for ordering the kit, increased screening participation compared with a standard second reminder. METHODS: In this randomized, controlled effectiveness trial, 9791 Danish women aged 30–64 who were due to receive the second reminder were equally randomized to either: 1) direct mailing of a second reminder and a self-sampling kit (directly mailed group); 2) mailing of a second reminder that offered a self-sampling kit to be ordered by e-mail, text message, phone, or webpage (opt-in group); or 3) mailing of a second reminder to attend regular cytology screening (control group). In an intention-to-treat analysis, we estimated the participation rate at 180 days post intervention, by returning a self-sample or attending regular cytology screening. We calculated the proportion of women with a positive HPV self-sample who attended for cervical cytology triage at the general practitioner within 90 days. RESULTS: Participation was significantly higher in the directly mailed group (38.0%) and in the opt-in group (30.9%) than in the control group (25.2%) (participation difference (PD): 12.8%, 95% CI: 10.6–15.0% and PD: 5.7%, 95% CI: 3.5–7.9%, respectively). Within 90 days, 107 women (90.7%, 95% CI: 83.9–95.3%) with a HPV-positive self-sample attended follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Offering the opportunity of HPV self-sampling as an alternative to regular cytology screening increased participation; the direct mailing strategy was the most effective invitation strategy. A high compliance with follow-up was seen. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials NCT02680262. Registered 10 February 2016. BioMed Central 2018-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5845195/ /pubmed/29523108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4165-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tranberg, Mette
Bech, Bodil Hammer
Blaakær, Jan
Jensen, Jørgen Skov
Svanholm, Hans
Andersen, Berit
Preventing cervical cancer using HPV self-sampling: direct mailing of test-kits increases screening participation more than timely opt-in procedures - a randomized controlled trial
title Preventing cervical cancer using HPV self-sampling: direct mailing of test-kits increases screening participation more than timely opt-in procedures - a randomized controlled trial
title_full Preventing cervical cancer using HPV self-sampling: direct mailing of test-kits increases screening participation more than timely opt-in procedures - a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Preventing cervical cancer using HPV self-sampling: direct mailing of test-kits increases screening participation more than timely opt-in procedures - a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Preventing cervical cancer using HPV self-sampling: direct mailing of test-kits increases screening participation more than timely opt-in procedures - a randomized controlled trial
title_short Preventing cervical cancer using HPV self-sampling: direct mailing of test-kits increases screening participation more than timely opt-in procedures - a randomized controlled trial
title_sort preventing cervical cancer using hpv self-sampling: direct mailing of test-kits increases screening participation more than timely opt-in procedures - a randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5845195/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29523108
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4165-4
work_keys_str_mv AT tranbergmette preventingcervicalcancerusinghpvselfsamplingdirectmailingoftestkitsincreasesscreeningparticipationmorethantimelyoptinproceduresarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bechbodilhammer preventingcervicalcancerusinghpvselfsamplingdirectmailingoftestkitsincreasesscreeningparticipationmorethantimelyoptinproceduresarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT blaakærjan preventingcervicalcancerusinghpvselfsamplingdirectmailingoftestkitsincreasesscreeningparticipationmorethantimelyoptinproceduresarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jensenjørgenskov preventingcervicalcancerusinghpvselfsamplingdirectmailingoftestkitsincreasesscreeningparticipationmorethantimelyoptinproceduresarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT svanholmhans preventingcervicalcancerusinghpvselfsamplingdirectmailingoftestkitsincreasesscreeningparticipationmorethantimelyoptinproceduresarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT andersenberit preventingcervicalcancerusinghpvselfsamplingdirectmailingoftestkitsincreasesscreeningparticipationmorethantimelyoptinproceduresarandomizedcontrolledtrial