Cargando…
Compassionate use programs in Italy: ethical guidelines
BACKGROUND: This article proposes a retrospective analysis of a compassionate use (CU), using a case study of request for Avelumab for a patient suffering from Merkel Cell Carcinoma. The study is the result of a discussion within a Provincial Ethics Committee (EC) following the finding of a high num...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5845200/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29523198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-018-0263-8 |
_version_ | 1783305378378809344 |
---|---|
author | De Panfilis, Ludovica Satolli, Roberto Costantini, Massimo |
author_facet | De Panfilis, Ludovica Satolli, Roberto Costantini, Massimo |
author_sort | De Panfilis, Ludovica |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This article proposes a retrospective analysis of a compassionate use (CU), using a case study of request for Avelumab for a patient suffering from Merkel Cell Carcinoma. The study is the result of a discussion within a Provincial Ethics Committee (EC) following the finding of a high number of requests for CU program. The primary objective of the study is to illustrate the specific ethical and clinical profiles that emerge from the compassionate use program (CUP) issue. The secondary goals are: a) to promote a moral reflection among physicians who require approval for the CUP and b) provide the basis for recommendations on how to request CUP. MAIN BODY: The instruments for carrying out the analysis of the case study and the discussion are as follows: Analysis of the audio-recording of the EC meeting regarding the selected Case study. In-depth discussion of topics that emerged during the meeting by means of administration of 5 semi-structured interviews with 2 doctors involved in the case (proposing physician and palliative physician) and with 3 components of the EC who played a major role in the EC internal discussion. CONCLUSIONS: In an exploration of emerging clinical and ethical issues, four primary themes arise: 1. efficacy, safety of the treatment and patient’s quality of life; 2. clear, realistic, adequate communication; 3. right to hope; 4. simultaneous Palliative Care approach. The results of ethical analysis carried out concern two areas: 1) ethical profiles relating to the use of CUP; 2) the role of the EC concerning the compassionate use of drugs and the need to provide recommendations on how to request CUP. With the aim of implementing these conclusions, the provincial EC of Reggio Emilia chose to steer the request for drugs for compassionate use through recommendations for good clinical and ethical practice based on the following assumptions: 1) the “simultaneous care” approach must be preferred. Secondly, 2) the EC’s assessment must be part of the decision-making process that the care team conducts before proposing compassionate use to the patient. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5845200 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58452002018-03-19 Compassionate use programs in Italy: ethical guidelines De Panfilis, Ludovica Satolli, Roberto Costantini, Massimo BMC Med Ethics Debate BACKGROUND: This article proposes a retrospective analysis of a compassionate use (CU), using a case study of request for Avelumab for a patient suffering from Merkel Cell Carcinoma. The study is the result of a discussion within a Provincial Ethics Committee (EC) following the finding of a high number of requests for CU program. The primary objective of the study is to illustrate the specific ethical and clinical profiles that emerge from the compassionate use program (CUP) issue. The secondary goals are: a) to promote a moral reflection among physicians who require approval for the CUP and b) provide the basis for recommendations on how to request CUP. MAIN BODY: The instruments for carrying out the analysis of the case study and the discussion are as follows: Analysis of the audio-recording of the EC meeting regarding the selected Case study. In-depth discussion of topics that emerged during the meeting by means of administration of 5 semi-structured interviews with 2 doctors involved in the case (proposing physician and palliative physician) and with 3 components of the EC who played a major role in the EC internal discussion. CONCLUSIONS: In an exploration of emerging clinical and ethical issues, four primary themes arise: 1. efficacy, safety of the treatment and patient’s quality of life; 2. clear, realistic, adequate communication; 3. right to hope; 4. simultaneous Palliative Care approach. The results of ethical analysis carried out concern two areas: 1) ethical profiles relating to the use of CUP; 2) the role of the EC concerning the compassionate use of drugs and the need to provide recommendations on how to request CUP. With the aim of implementing these conclusions, the provincial EC of Reggio Emilia chose to steer the request for drugs for compassionate use through recommendations for good clinical and ethical practice based on the following assumptions: 1) the “simultaneous care” approach must be preferred. Secondly, 2) the EC’s assessment must be part of the decision-making process that the care team conducts before proposing compassionate use to the patient. BioMed Central 2018-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5845200/ /pubmed/29523198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-018-0263-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Debate De Panfilis, Ludovica Satolli, Roberto Costantini, Massimo Compassionate use programs in Italy: ethical guidelines |
title | Compassionate use programs in Italy: ethical guidelines |
title_full | Compassionate use programs in Italy: ethical guidelines |
title_fullStr | Compassionate use programs in Italy: ethical guidelines |
title_full_unstemmed | Compassionate use programs in Italy: ethical guidelines |
title_short | Compassionate use programs in Italy: ethical guidelines |
title_sort | compassionate use programs in italy: ethical guidelines |
topic | Debate |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5845200/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29523198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-018-0263-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT depanfilisludovica compassionateuseprogramsinitalyethicalguidelines AT satolliroberto compassionateuseprogramsinitalyethicalguidelines AT costantinimassimo compassionateuseprogramsinitalyethicalguidelines |