Cargando…

Compassionate use programs in Italy: ethical guidelines

BACKGROUND: This article proposes a retrospective analysis of a compassionate use (CU), using a case study of request for Avelumab for a patient suffering from Merkel Cell Carcinoma. The study is the result of a discussion within a Provincial Ethics Committee (EC) following the finding of a high num...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Panfilis, Ludovica, Satolli, Roberto, Costantini, Massimo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5845200/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29523198
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-018-0263-8
_version_ 1783305378378809344
author De Panfilis, Ludovica
Satolli, Roberto
Costantini, Massimo
author_facet De Panfilis, Ludovica
Satolli, Roberto
Costantini, Massimo
author_sort De Panfilis, Ludovica
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This article proposes a retrospective analysis of a compassionate use (CU), using a case study of request for Avelumab for a patient suffering from Merkel Cell Carcinoma. The study is the result of a discussion within a Provincial Ethics Committee (EC) following the finding of a high number of requests for CU program. The primary objective of the study is to illustrate the specific ethical and clinical profiles that emerge from the compassionate use program (CUP) issue. The secondary goals are: a) to promote a moral reflection among physicians who require approval for the CUP and b) provide the basis for recommendations on how to request CUP. MAIN BODY: The instruments for carrying out the analysis of the case study and the discussion are as follows: Analysis of the audio-recording of the EC meeting regarding the selected Case study. In-depth discussion of topics that emerged during the meeting by means of administration of 5 semi-structured interviews with 2 doctors involved in the case (proposing physician and palliative physician) and with 3 components of the EC who played a major role in the EC internal discussion. CONCLUSIONS: In an exploration of emerging clinical and ethical issues, four primary themes arise: 1. efficacy, safety of the treatment and patient’s quality of life; 2. clear, realistic, adequate communication; 3. right to hope; 4. simultaneous Palliative Care approach. The results of ethical analysis carried out concern two areas: 1) ethical profiles relating to the use of CUP; 2) the role of the EC concerning the compassionate use of drugs and the need to provide recommendations on how to request CUP. With the aim of implementing these conclusions, the provincial EC of Reggio Emilia chose to steer the request for drugs for compassionate use through recommendations for good clinical and ethical practice based on the following assumptions: 1) the “simultaneous care” approach must be preferred. Secondly, 2) the EC’s assessment must be part of the decision-making process that the care team conducts before proposing compassionate use to the patient.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5845200
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58452002018-03-19 Compassionate use programs in Italy: ethical guidelines De Panfilis, Ludovica Satolli, Roberto Costantini, Massimo BMC Med Ethics Debate BACKGROUND: This article proposes a retrospective analysis of a compassionate use (CU), using a case study of request for Avelumab for a patient suffering from Merkel Cell Carcinoma. The study is the result of a discussion within a Provincial Ethics Committee (EC) following the finding of a high number of requests for CU program. The primary objective of the study is to illustrate the specific ethical and clinical profiles that emerge from the compassionate use program (CUP) issue. The secondary goals are: a) to promote a moral reflection among physicians who require approval for the CUP and b) provide the basis for recommendations on how to request CUP. MAIN BODY: The instruments for carrying out the analysis of the case study and the discussion are as follows: Analysis of the audio-recording of the EC meeting regarding the selected Case study. In-depth discussion of topics that emerged during the meeting by means of administration of 5 semi-structured interviews with 2 doctors involved in the case (proposing physician and palliative physician) and with 3 components of the EC who played a major role in the EC internal discussion. CONCLUSIONS: In an exploration of emerging clinical and ethical issues, four primary themes arise: 1. efficacy, safety of the treatment and patient’s quality of life; 2. clear, realistic, adequate communication; 3. right to hope; 4. simultaneous Palliative Care approach. The results of ethical analysis carried out concern two areas: 1) ethical profiles relating to the use of CUP; 2) the role of the EC concerning the compassionate use of drugs and the need to provide recommendations on how to request CUP. With the aim of implementing these conclusions, the provincial EC of Reggio Emilia chose to steer the request for drugs for compassionate use through recommendations for good clinical and ethical practice based on the following assumptions: 1) the “simultaneous care” approach must be preferred. Secondly, 2) the EC’s assessment must be part of the decision-making process that the care team conducts before proposing compassionate use to the patient. BioMed Central 2018-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5845200/ /pubmed/29523198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-018-0263-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Debate
De Panfilis, Ludovica
Satolli, Roberto
Costantini, Massimo
Compassionate use programs in Italy: ethical guidelines
title Compassionate use programs in Italy: ethical guidelines
title_full Compassionate use programs in Italy: ethical guidelines
title_fullStr Compassionate use programs in Italy: ethical guidelines
title_full_unstemmed Compassionate use programs in Italy: ethical guidelines
title_short Compassionate use programs in Italy: ethical guidelines
title_sort compassionate use programs in italy: ethical guidelines
topic Debate
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5845200/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29523198
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-018-0263-8
work_keys_str_mv AT depanfilisludovica compassionateuseprogramsinitalyethicalguidelines
AT satolliroberto compassionateuseprogramsinitalyethicalguidelines
AT costantinimassimo compassionateuseprogramsinitalyethicalguidelines