Cargando…

Visual quality assessment of the liver graft by the transplanting surgeon predicts postreperfusion syndrome after liver transplantation: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: The discrepancy between demand and supply for liver transplants (LT) has led to an increased transplantation of organs from extended criteria donors (ECD). METHODS: In this single center retrospective analysis of 122 cadaveric LT recipients, we investigated predictors of postreperfusion...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kork, Felix, Rimek, Alexandra, Andert, Anne, Becker, Niklas Jurek, Heidenhain, Christoph, Neumann, Ulf P., Kroy, Daniela, Roehl, Anna B., Rossaint, Rolf, Hein, Marc
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5845208/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29523082
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-018-0493-9
_version_ 1783305380283023360
author Kork, Felix
Rimek, Alexandra
Andert, Anne
Becker, Niklas Jurek
Heidenhain, Christoph
Neumann, Ulf P.
Kroy, Daniela
Roehl, Anna B.
Rossaint, Rolf
Hein, Marc
author_facet Kork, Felix
Rimek, Alexandra
Andert, Anne
Becker, Niklas Jurek
Heidenhain, Christoph
Neumann, Ulf P.
Kroy, Daniela
Roehl, Anna B.
Rossaint, Rolf
Hein, Marc
author_sort Kork, Felix
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The discrepancy between demand and supply for liver transplants (LT) has led to an increased transplantation of organs from extended criteria donors (ECD). METHODS: In this single center retrospective analysis of 122 cadaveric LT recipients, we investigated predictors of postreperfusion syndrome (PRS) including transplant liver quality categorized by both histological assessment of steatosis and subjective visual assessment by the transplanting surgeon using multivariable regression analysis. Furthermore, we describe the relevance of PRS during the intraoperative and postoperative course of LT recipients. RESULTS: 53.3% (n = 65) of the patients suffered from PRS. Risk factors for PRS were visually assessed organ quality of the liver grafts (acceptable: OR 12.2 [95% CI 2.43–61.59], P = 0.002; poor: OR 13.4 [95% CI 1.48–121.1], P = 0.02) as well as intraoperative norepinephrine dosage before reperfusion (OR 2.2 [95% CI 1.26–3.86] per 0.1 μg kg(− 1) min(− 1), P = 0.01). In contrast, histological assessment of the graft was not associated with PRS. LT recipients suffering from PRS were hemodynamically more instable after reperfusion compared to recipients not suffering from PRS. They had lower mean arterial pressures until the end of surgery (P < 0.001), received more epinephrine and norepinephrine before reperfusion (P = 0.02 and P < 0.001, respectively) as well as higher rates of continuous infusion of norepinephrine (P < 0.001) and vasopressin (P = 0.02) after reperfusion. Postoperative peak AST was significantly higher (P = 0.001) in LT recipients with PRS. LT recipients with intraoperative PRS had more postoperative adverse cardiac events (P = 0.05) and suffered more often from postoperative delirium (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving ECD liver grafts are especially prone to PRS. Anesthesiologists should keep these newly described risk factors in mind when preparing for reperfusion in patients receiving high-risk organs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5845208
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58452082018-03-19 Visual quality assessment of the liver graft by the transplanting surgeon predicts postreperfusion syndrome after liver transplantation: a retrospective cohort study Kork, Felix Rimek, Alexandra Andert, Anne Becker, Niklas Jurek Heidenhain, Christoph Neumann, Ulf P. Kroy, Daniela Roehl, Anna B. Rossaint, Rolf Hein, Marc BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: The discrepancy between demand and supply for liver transplants (LT) has led to an increased transplantation of organs from extended criteria donors (ECD). METHODS: In this single center retrospective analysis of 122 cadaveric LT recipients, we investigated predictors of postreperfusion syndrome (PRS) including transplant liver quality categorized by both histological assessment of steatosis and subjective visual assessment by the transplanting surgeon using multivariable regression analysis. Furthermore, we describe the relevance of PRS during the intraoperative and postoperative course of LT recipients. RESULTS: 53.3% (n = 65) of the patients suffered from PRS. Risk factors for PRS were visually assessed organ quality of the liver grafts (acceptable: OR 12.2 [95% CI 2.43–61.59], P = 0.002; poor: OR 13.4 [95% CI 1.48–121.1], P = 0.02) as well as intraoperative norepinephrine dosage before reperfusion (OR 2.2 [95% CI 1.26–3.86] per 0.1 μg kg(− 1) min(− 1), P = 0.01). In contrast, histological assessment of the graft was not associated with PRS. LT recipients suffering from PRS were hemodynamically more instable after reperfusion compared to recipients not suffering from PRS. They had lower mean arterial pressures until the end of surgery (P < 0.001), received more epinephrine and norepinephrine before reperfusion (P = 0.02 and P < 0.001, respectively) as well as higher rates of continuous infusion of norepinephrine (P < 0.001) and vasopressin (P = 0.02) after reperfusion. Postoperative peak AST was significantly higher (P = 0.001) in LT recipients with PRS. LT recipients with intraoperative PRS had more postoperative adverse cardiac events (P = 0.05) and suffered more often from postoperative delirium (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving ECD liver grafts are especially prone to PRS. Anesthesiologists should keep these newly described risk factors in mind when preparing for reperfusion in patients receiving high-risk organs. BioMed Central 2018-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5845208/ /pubmed/29523082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-018-0493-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kork, Felix
Rimek, Alexandra
Andert, Anne
Becker, Niklas Jurek
Heidenhain, Christoph
Neumann, Ulf P.
Kroy, Daniela
Roehl, Anna B.
Rossaint, Rolf
Hein, Marc
Visual quality assessment of the liver graft by the transplanting surgeon predicts postreperfusion syndrome after liver transplantation: a retrospective cohort study
title Visual quality assessment of the liver graft by the transplanting surgeon predicts postreperfusion syndrome after liver transplantation: a retrospective cohort study
title_full Visual quality assessment of the liver graft by the transplanting surgeon predicts postreperfusion syndrome after liver transplantation: a retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Visual quality assessment of the liver graft by the transplanting surgeon predicts postreperfusion syndrome after liver transplantation: a retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Visual quality assessment of the liver graft by the transplanting surgeon predicts postreperfusion syndrome after liver transplantation: a retrospective cohort study
title_short Visual quality assessment of the liver graft by the transplanting surgeon predicts postreperfusion syndrome after liver transplantation: a retrospective cohort study
title_sort visual quality assessment of the liver graft by the transplanting surgeon predicts postreperfusion syndrome after liver transplantation: a retrospective cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5845208/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29523082
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-018-0493-9
work_keys_str_mv AT korkfelix visualqualityassessmentofthelivergraftbythetransplantingsurgeonpredictspostreperfusionsyndromeafterlivertransplantationaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT rimekalexandra visualqualityassessmentofthelivergraftbythetransplantingsurgeonpredictspostreperfusionsyndromeafterlivertransplantationaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT andertanne visualqualityassessmentofthelivergraftbythetransplantingsurgeonpredictspostreperfusionsyndromeafterlivertransplantationaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT beckerniklasjurek visualqualityassessmentofthelivergraftbythetransplantingsurgeonpredictspostreperfusionsyndromeafterlivertransplantationaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT heidenhainchristoph visualqualityassessmentofthelivergraftbythetransplantingsurgeonpredictspostreperfusionsyndromeafterlivertransplantationaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT neumannulfp visualqualityassessmentofthelivergraftbythetransplantingsurgeonpredictspostreperfusionsyndromeafterlivertransplantationaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT kroydaniela visualqualityassessmentofthelivergraftbythetransplantingsurgeonpredictspostreperfusionsyndromeafterlivertransplantationaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT roehlannab visualqualityassessmentofthelivergraftbythetransplantingsurgeonpredictspostreperfusionsyndromeafterlivertransplantationaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT rossaintrolf visualqualityassessmentofthelivergraftbythetransplantingsurgeonpredictspostreperfusionsyndromeafterlivertransplantationaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT heinmarc visualqualityassessmentofthelivergraftbythetransplantingsurgeonpredictspostreperfusionsyndromeafterlivertransplantationaretrospectivecohortstudy