Cargando…
Contrasting groups’ standard setting for consequences analysis in validity studies: reporting considerations
BACKGROUND: The contrasting groups’ standard setting method is commonly used for consequences analysis in validity studies for performance in medicine and surgery. The method identifies a pass/fail cut-off score, from which it is possible to determine false positives and false negatives based on obs...
Autores principales: | Jørgensen, Morten, Konge, Lars, Subhi, Yousif |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5845294/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29556423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41077-018-0064-7 |
Ejemplares similares
-
An integrable, web-based solution for easy assessment of video-recorded performances
por: Subhi, Yousif, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Designing web-apps for smartphones can be easy as making slideshow presentations
por: Subhi, Yousif, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
A comparison of standard and compositional data analysis in studies addressing group differences in sedentary behavior and physical activity
por: Gupta, Nidhi, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Ensuring basic competency in chest tube insertion using a simulated scenario: an international validation study
por: Hertz, Peter, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Considerations for Using Multiple Imputation in Propensity Score-Weighted Analysis – A Tutorial with Applied Example
por: Eiset, Andreas Halgreen, et al.
Publicado: (2022)