Cargando…

Comparison of pain response after subcutaneous injection of two maropitant formulations to beagle dogs

The antiemetic maropitant, with metacresol as preservative (Cerenia, Zoetis), has been associated with pain after subcutaneous injection in dogs and cats. Recently, a generic formulation containing benzyl alcohol was authorised (Prevomax, Le Vet). Benzyl alcohol is reported to have local anaesthetic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deckers, Nynke, Ruigrok, Catharina A, Verhoeve, Hans Peter, Lourens, Nicky
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5845409/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29531751
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vetreco-2017-000262
_version_ 1783305426366889984
author Deckers, Nynke
Ruigrok, Catharina A
Verhoeve, Hans Peter
Lourens, Nicky
author_facet Deckers, Nynke
Ruigrok, Catharina A
Verhoeve, Hans Peter
Lourens, Nicky
author_sort Deckers, Nynke
collection PubMed
description The antiemetic maropitant, with metacresol as preservative (Cerenia, Zoetis), has been associated with pain after subcutaneous injection in dogs and cats. Recently, a generic formulation containing benzyl alcohol was authorised (Prevomax, Le Vet). Benzyl alcohol is reported to have local anaesthetic properties and reduce injection pain. This study compared local pain after subcutaneous injection of the two maropitant formulations, administered at approximately 4°C and 25°C, to dogs. Thirty-two healthy beagle dogs were enrolled into a blinded, randomised, cross-over study. Dogs received subcutaneous injections of maropitant injection containing metacresol as preservative and maropitant injection containing benzyl alcohol as preservative, both at approximately 4°C and 25°C, with at least three days in between treatments. Injection pain was evaluated by two blinded observers using a visual analogue scale immediately after injection and a simple descriptive scale at two minutes after injection. In healthy beagle dogs, subcutaneous injection of maropitant with benzyl alcohol is significantly less painful than injection of maropitant with metacresol.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5845409
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58454092018-03-12 Comparison of pain response after subcutaneous injection of two maropitant formulations to beagle dogs Deckers, Nynke Ruigrok, Catharina A Verhoeve, Hans Peter Lourens, Nicky Vet Rec Open Non-Clinical The antiemetic maropitant, with metacresol as preservative (Cerenia, Zoetis), has been associated with pain after subcutaneous injection in dogs and cats. Recently, a generic formulation containing benzyl alcohol was authorised (Prevomax, Le Vet). Benzyl alcohol is reported to have local anaesthetic properties and reduce injection pain. This study compared local pain after subcutaneous injection of the two maropitant formulations, administered at approximately 4°C and 25°C, to dogs. Thirty-two healthy beagle dogs were enrolled into a blinded, randomised, cross-over study. Dogs received subcutaneous injections of maropitant injection containing metacresol as preservative and maropitant injection containing benzyl alcohol as preservative, both at approximately 4°C and 25°C, with at least three days in between treatments. Injection pain was evaluated by two blinded observers using a visual analogue scale immediately after injection and a simple descriptive scale at two minutes after injection. In healthy beagle dogs, subcutaneous injection of maropitant with benzyl alcohol is significantly less painful than injection of maropitant with metacresol. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5845409/ /pubmed/29531751 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vetreco-2017-000262 Text en © British Veterinary Association (unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Non-Clinical
Deckers, Nynke
Ruigrok, Catharina A
Verhoeve, Hans Peter
Lourens, Nicky
Comparison of pain response after subcutaneous injection of two maropitant formulations to beagle dogs
title Comparison of pain response after subcutaneous injection of two maropitant formulations to beagle dogs
title_full Comparison of pain response after subcutaneous injection of two maropitant formulations to beagle dogs
title_fullStr Comparison of pain response after subcutaneous injection of two maropitant formulations to beagle dogs
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of pain response after subcutaneous injection of two maropitant formulations to beagle dogs
title_short Comparison of pain response after subcutaneous injection of two maropitant formulations to beagle dogs
title_sort comparison of pain response after subcutaneous injection of two maropitant formulations to beagle dogs
topic Non-Clinical
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5845409/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29531751
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vetreco-2017-000262
work_keys_str_mv AT deckersnynke comparisonofpainresponseaftersubcutaneousinjectionoftwomaropitantformulationstobeagledogs
AT ruigrokcatharinaa comparisonofpainresponseaftersubcutaneousinjectionoftwomaropitantformulationstobeagledogs
AT verhoevehanspeter comparisonofpainresponseaftersubcutaneousinjectionoftwomaropitantformulationstobeagledogs
AT lourensnicky comparisonofpainresponseaftersubcutaneousinjectionoftwomaropitantformulationstobeagledogs