Cargando…
A Comparative (68)Ga-Citrate and (68)Ga-Chloride PET/CT Imaging of Staphylococcus aureus Osteomyelitis in the Rat Tibia
There may be some differences in the in vivo behavior of (68)Ga-chloride and (68)Ga-citrate leading to different accumulation profiles. This study compared (68)Ga-citrate and (68)Ga-chloride PET/CT imaging under standardized experimental models. Methods. Diffuse Staphylococcus aureus tibial osteomye...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5845485/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29681785 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9892604 |
_version_ | 1783305434017300480 |
---|---|
author | Lankinen, Petteri Noponen, Tommi Autio, Anu Luoto, Pauliina Frantzèn, Janek Löyttyniemi, Eliisa Hakanen, Antti J. Aro, Hannu T. Roivainen, Anne |
author_facet | Lankinen, Petteri Noponen, Tommi Autio, Anu Luoto, Pauliina Frantzèn, Janek Löyttyniemi, Eliisa Hakanen, Antti J. Aro, Hannu T. Roivainen, Anne |
author_sort | Lankinen, Petteri |
collection | PubMed |
description | There may be some differences in the in vivo behavior of (68)Ga-chloride and (68)Ga-citrate leading to different accumulation profiles. This study compared (68)Ga-citrate and (68)Ga-chloride PET/CT imaging under standardized experimental models. Methods. Diffuse Staphylococcus aureus tibial osteomyelitis and uncomplicated bone healing rat models were used (n = 32). Two weeks after surgery, PET/CT imaging was performed on consecutive days using (68)Ga-citrate or (68)Ga-chloride, and tissue accumulation was confirmed by ex vivo analysis. In addition, peripheral quantitative computed tomography and conventional radiography were performed. Osteomyelitis was verified by microbiological analysis and specimens were also processed for histomorphometry. Results. In PET/CT imaging, the SUV(max) of (68)Ga-chloride and (68)Ga-citrate in the osteomyelitic tibias (3.6 ± 1.4 and 4.7 ± 1.5, resp.) were significantly higher (P = 0.0019 and P = 0.0020, resp.) than in the uncomplicated bone healing (2.7 ± 0.44 and 2.5 ± 0.49, resp.). In osteomyelitic tibias, the SUV(max) of (68)Ga-citrate was significantly higher than the uptake of (68)Ga-chloride (P = 0.0017). In animals with uncomplicated bone healing, no difference in the SUV(max) of (68)Ga-chloride or (68)Ga-citrate was seen in the operated tibias. Conclusions. This study further corroborates the use of (68)Ga-citrate for PET imaging of osteomyelitis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5845485 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58454852018-04-21 A Comparative (68)Ga-Citrate and (68)Ga-Chloride PET/CT Imaging of Staphylococcus aureus Osteomyelitis in the Rat Tibia Lankinen, Petteri Noponen, Tommi Autio, Anu Luoto, Pauliina Frantzèn, Janek Löyttyniemi, Eliisa Hakanen, Antti J. Aro, Hannu T. Roivainen, Anne Contrast Media Mol Imaging Research Article There may be some differences in the in vivo behavior of (68)Ga-chloride and (68)Ga-citrate leading to different accumulation profiles. This study compared (68)Ga-citrate and (68)Ga-chloride PET/CT imaging under standardized experimental models. Methods. Diffuse Staphylococcus aureus tibial osteomyelitis and uncomplicated bone healing rat models were used (n = 32). Two weeks after surgery, PET/CT imaging was performed on consecutive days using (68)Ga-citrate or (68)Ga-chloride, and tissue accumulation was confirmed by ex vivo analysis. In addition, peripheral quantitative computed tomography and conventional radiography were performed. Osteomyelitis was verified by microbiological analysis and specimens were also processed for histomorphometry. Results. In PET/CT imaging, the SUV(max) of (68)Ga-chloride and (68)Ga-citrate in the osteomyelitic tibias (3.6 ± 1.4 and 4.7 ± 1.5, resp.) were significantly higher (P = 0.0019 and P = 0.0020, resp.) than in the uncomplicated bone healing (2.7 ± 0.44 and 2.5 ± 0.49, resp.). In osteomyelitic tibias, the SUV(max) of (68)Ga-citrate was significantly higher than the uptake of (68)Ga-chloride (P = 0.0017). In animals with uncomplicated bone healing, no difference in the SUV(max) of (68)Ga-chloride or (68)Ga-citrate was seen in the operated tibias. Conclusions. This study further corroborates the use of (68)Ga-citrate for PET imaging of osteomyelitis. Hindawi 2018-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5845485/ /pubmed/29681785 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9892604 Text en Copyright © 2018 Petteri Lankinen et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lankinen, Petteri Noponen, Tommi Autio, Anu Luoto, Pauliina Frantzèn, Janek Löyttyniemi, Eliisa Hakanen, Antti J. Aro, Hannu T. Roivainen, Anne A Comparative (68)Ga-Citrate and (68)Ga-Chloride PET/CT Imaging of Staphylococcus aureus Osteomyelitis in the Rat Tibia |
title | A Comparative (68)Ga-Citrate and (68)Ga-Chloride PET/CT Imaging of Staphylococcus aureus Osteomyelitis in the Rat Tibia |
title_full | A Comparative (68)Ga-Citrate and (68)Ga-Chloride PET/CT Imaging of Staphylococcus aureus Osteomyelitis in the Rat Tibia |
title_fullStr | A Comparative (68)Ga-Citrate and (68)Ga-Chloride PET/CT Imaging of Staphylococcus aureus Osteomyelitis in the Rat Tibia |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparative (68)Ga-Citrate and (68)Ga-Chloride PET/CT Imaging of Staphylococcus aureus Osteomyelitis in the Rat Tibia |
title_short | A Comparative (68)Ga-Citrate and (68)Ga-Chloride PET/CT Imaging of Staphylococcus aureus Osteomyelitis in the Rat Tibia |
title_sort | comparative (68)ga-citrate and (68)ga-chloride pet/ct imaging of staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis in the rat tibia |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5845485/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29681785 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9892604 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lankinenpetteri acomparative68gacitrateand68gachloridepetctimagingofstaphylococcusaureusosteomyelitisintherattibia AT noponentommi acomparative68gacitrateand68gachloridepetctimagingofstaphylococcusaureusosteomyelitisintherattibia AT autioanu acomparative68gacitrateand68gachloridepetctimagingofstaphylococcusaureusosteomyelitisintherattibia AT luotopauliina acomparative68gacitrateand68gachloridepetctimagingofstaphylococcusaureusosteomyelitisintherattibia AT frantzenjanek acomparative68gacitrateand68gachloridepetctimagingofstaphylococcusaureusosteomyelitisintherattibia AT loyttyniemieliisa acomparative68gacitrateand68gachloridepetctimagingofstaphylococcusaureusosteomyelitisintherattibia AT hakanenanttij acomparative68gacitrateand68gachloridepetctimagingofstaphylococcusaureusosteomyelitisintherattibia AT arohannut acomparative68gacitrateand68gachloridepetctimagingofstaphylococcusaureusosteomyelitisintherattibia AT roivainenanne acomparative68gacitrateand68gachloridepetctimagingofstaphylococcusaureusosteomyelitisintherattibia AT lankinenpetteri comparative68gacitrateand68gachloridepetctimagingofstaphylococcusaureusosteomyelitisintherattibia AT noponentommi comparative68gacitrateand68gachloridepetctimagingofstaphylococcusaureusosteomyelitisintherattibia AT autioanu comparative68gacitrateand68gachloridepetctimagingofstaphylococcusaureusosteomyelitisintherattibia AT luotopauliina comparative68gacitrateand68gachloridepetctimagingofstaphylococcusaureusosteomyelitisintherattibia AT frantzenjanek comparative68gacitrateand68gachloridepetctimagingofstaphylococcusaureusosteomyelitisintherattibia AT loyttyniemieliisa comparative68gacitrateand68gachloridepetctimagingofstaphylococcusaureusosteomyelitisintherattibia AT hakanenanttij comparative68gacitrateand68gachloridepetctimagingofstaphylococcusaureusosteomyelitisintherattibia AT arohannut comparative68gacitrateand68gachloridepetctimagingofstaphylococcusaureusosteomyelitisintherattibia AT roivainenanne comparative68gacitrateand68gachloridepetctimagingofstaphylococcusaureusosteomyelitisintherattibia |