Cargando…

A Comparative (68)Ga-Citrate and (68)Ga-Chloride PET/CT Imaging of Staphylococcus aureus Osteomyelitis in the Rat Tibia

There may be some differences in the in vivo behavior of (68)Ga-chloride and (68)Ga-citrate leading to different accumulation profiles. This study compared (68)Ga-citrate and (68)Ga-chloride PET/CT imaging under standardized experimental models. Methods. Diffuse Staphylococcus aureus tibial osteomye...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lankinen, Petteri, Noponen, Tommi, Autio, Anu, Luoto, Pauliina, Frantzèn, Janek, Löyttyniemi, Eliisa, Hakanen, Antti J., Aro, Hannu T., Roivainen, Anne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5845485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29681785
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9892604
_version_ 1783305434017300480
author Lankinen, Petteri
Noponen, Tommi
Autio, Anu
Luoto, Pauliina
Frantzèn, Janek
Löyttyniemi, Eliisa
Hakanen, Antti J.
Aro, Hannu T.
Roivainen, Anne
author_facet Lankinen, Petteri
Noponen, Tommi
Autio, Anu
Luoto, Pauliina
Frantzèn, Janek
Löyttyniemi, Eliisa
Hakanen, Antti J.
Aro, Hannu T.
Roivainen, Anne
author_sort Lankinen, Petteri
collection PubMed
description There may be some differences in the in vivo behavior of (68)Ga-chloride and (68)Ga-citrate leading to different accumulation profiles. This study compared (68)Ga-citrate and (68)Ga-chloride PET/CT imaging under standardized experimental models. Methods. Diffuse Staphylococcus aureus tibial osteomyelitis and uncomplicated bone healing rat models were used (n = 32). Two weeks after surgery, PET/CT imaging was performed on consecutive days using (68)Ga-citrate or (68)Ga-chloride, and tissue accumulation was confirmed by ex vivo analysis. In addition, peripheral quantitative computed tomography and conventional radiography were performed. Osteomyelitis was verified by microbiological analysis and specimens were also processed for histomorphometry. Results. In PET/CT imaging, the SUV(max) of (68)Ga-chloride and (68)Ga-citrate in the osteomyelitic tibias (3.6 ± 1.4 and 4.7 ± 1.5, resp.) were significantly higher (P = 0.0019 and P = 0.0020, resp.) than in the uncomplicated bone healing (2.7 ± 0.44 and 2.5 ± 0.49, resp.). In osteomyelitic tibias, the SUV(max) of (68)Ga-citrate was significantly higher than the uptake of (68)Ga-chloride (P = 0.0017). In animals with uncomplicated bone healing, no difference in the SUV(max) of (68)Ga-chloride or (68)Ga-citrate was seen in the operated tibias. Conclusions. This study further corroborates the use of (68)Ga-citrate for PET imaging of osteomyelitis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5845485
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58454852018-04-21 A Comparative (68)Ga-Citrate and (68)Ga-Chloride PET/CT Imaging of Staphylococcus aureus Osteomyelitis in the Rat Tibia Lankinen, Petteri Noponen, Tommi Autio, Anu Luoto, Pauliina Frantzèn, Janek Löyttyniemi, Eliisa Hakanen, Antti J. Aro, Hannu T. Roivainen, Anne Contrast Media Mol Imaging Research Article There may be some differences in the in vivo behavior of (68)Ga-chloride and (68)Ga-citrate leading to different accumulation profiles. This study compared (68)Ga-citrate and (68)Ga-chloride PET/CT imaging under standardized experimental models. Methods. Diffuse Staphylococcus aureus tibial osteomyelitis and uncomplicated bone healing rat models were used (n = 32). Two weeks after surgery, PET/CT imaging was performed on consecutive days using (68)Ga-citrate or (68)Ga-chloride, and tissue accumulation was confirmed by ex vivo analysis. In addition, peripheral quantitative computed tomography and conventional radiography were performed. Osteomyelitis was verified by microbiological analysis and specimens were also processed for histomorphometry. Results. In PET/CT imaging, the SUV(max) of (68)Ga-chloride and (68)Ga-citrate in the osteomyelitic tibias (3.6 ± 1.4 and 4.7 ± 1.5, resp.) were significantly higher (P = 0.0019 and P = 0.0020, resp.) than in the uncomplicated bone healing (2.7 ± 0.44 and 2.5 ± 0.49, resp.). In osteomyelitic tibias, the SUV(max) of (68)Ga-citrate was significantly higher than the uptake of (68)Ga-chloride (P = 0.0017). In animals with uncomplicated bone healing, no difference in the SUV(max) of (68)Ga-chloride or (68)Ga-citrate was seen in the operated tibias. Conclusions. This study further corroborates the use of (68)Ga-citrate for PET imaging of osteomyelitis. Hindawi 2018-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5845485/ /pubmed/29681785 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9892604 Text en Copyright © 2018 Petteri Lankinen et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lankinen, Petteri
Noponen, Tommi
Autio, Anu
Luoto, Pauliina
Frantzèn, Janek
Löyttyniemi, Eliisa
Hakanen, Antti J.
Aro, Hannu T.
Roivainen, Anne
A Comparative (68)Ga-Citrate and (68)Ga-Chloride PET/CT Imaging of Staphylococcus aureus Osteomyelitis in the Rat Tibia
title A Comparative (68)Ga-Citrate and (68)Ga-Chloride PET/CT Imaging of Staphylococcus aureus Osteomyelitis in the Rat Tibia
title_full A Comparative (68)Ga-Citrate and (68)Ga-Chloride PET/CT Imaging of Staphylococcus aureus Osteomyelitis in the Rat Tibia
title_fullStr A Comparative (68)Ga-Citrate and (68)Ga-Chloride PET/CT Imaging of Staphylococcus aureus Osteomyelitis in the Rat Tibia
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative (68)Ga-Citrate and (68)Ga-Chloride PET/CT Imaging of Staphylococcus aureus Osteomyelitis in the Rat Tibia
title_short A Comparative (68)Ga-Citrate and (68)Ga-Chloride PET/CT Imaging of Staphylococcus aureus Osteomyelitis in the Rat Tibia
title_sort comparative (68)ga-citrate and (68)ga-chloride pet/ct imaging of staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis in the rat tibia
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5845485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29681785
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9892604
work_keys_str_mv AT lankinenpetteri acomparative68gacitrateand68gachloridepetctimagingofstaphylococcusaureusosteomyelitisintherattibia
AT noponentommi acomparative68gacitrateand68gachloridepetctimagingofstaphylococcusaureusosteomyelitisintherattibia
AT autioanu acomparative68gacitrateand68gachloridepetctimagingofstaphylococcusaureusosteomyelitisintherattibia
AT luotopauliina acomparative68gacitrateand68gachloridepetctimagingofstaphylococcusaureusosteomyelitisintherattibia
AT frantzenjanek acomparative68gacitrateand68gachloridepetctimagingofstaphylococcusaureusosteomyelitisintherattibia
AT loyttyniemieliisa acomparative68gacitrateand68gachloridepetctimagingofstaphylococcusaureusosteomyelitisintherattibia
AT hakanenanttij acomparative68gacitrateand68gachloridepetctimagingofstaphylococcusaureusosteomyelitisintherattibia
AT arohannut acomparative68gacitrateand68gachloridepetctimagingofstaphylococcusaureusosteomyelitisintherattibia
AT roivainenanne acomparative68gacitrateand68gachloridepetctimagingofstaphylococcusaureusosteomyelitisintherattibia
AT lankinenpetteri comparative68gacitrateand68gachloridepetctimagingofstaphylococcusaureusosteomyelitisintherattibia
AT noponentommi comparative68gacitrateand68gachloridepetctimagingofstaphylococcusaureusosteomyelitisintherattibia
AT autioanu comparative68gacitrateand68gachloridepetctimagingofstaphylococcusaureusosteomyelitisintherattibia
AT luotopauliina comparative68gacitrateand68gachloridepetctimagingofstaphylococcusaureusosteomyelitisintherattibia
AT frantzenjanek comparative68gacitrateand68gachloridepetctimagingofstaphylococcusaureusosteomyelitisintherattibia
AT loyttyniemieliisa comparative68gacitrateand68gachloridepetctimagingofstaphylococcusaureusosteomyelitisintherattibia
AT hakanenanttij comparative68gacitrateand68gachloridepetctimagingofstaphylococcusaureusosteomyelitisintherattibia
AT arohannut comparative68gacitrateand68gachloridepetctimagingofstaphylococcusaureusosteomyelitisintherattibia
AT roivainenanne comparative68gacitrateand68gachloridepetctimagingofstaphylococcusaureusosteomyelitisintherattibia