Cargando…

Prognostic factors of non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor revisited: The value of WHO 2010 classification

BACKGROUNDS/AIMS: Various factors have been reported as prognostic factors of non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-pNETs). There remains some controversy as to the factors which might actually serve to successfully prognosticate future manifestation and diagnosis of NF-pNETs. As well,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bu, Jiyoung, Youn, Sangmin, Kwon, Wooil, Jang, Kee Taek, Han, Sanghyup, Han, Sunjong, You, Younghun, Heo, Jin Seok, Choi, Seong Ho, Choi, Dong Wook
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Association of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5845613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29536058
http://dx.doi.org/10.14701/ahbps.2018.22.1.66
_version_ 1783305463029301248
author Bu, Jiyoung
Youn, Sangmin
Kwon, Wooil
Jang, Kee Taek
Han, Sanghyup
Han, Sunjong
You, Younghun
Heo, Jin Seok
Choi, Seong Ho
Choi, Dong Wook
author_facet Bu, Jiyoung
Youn, Sangmin
Kwon, Wooil
Jang, Kee Taek
Han, Sanghyup
Han, Sunjong
You, Younghun
Heo, Jin Seok
Choi, Seong Ho
Choi, Dong Wook
author_sort Bu, Jiyoung
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUNDS/AIMS: Various factors have been reported as prognostic factors of non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-pNETs). There remains some controversy as to the factors which might actually serve to successfully prognosticate future manifestation and diagnosis of NF-pNETs. As well, consensus regarding management strategy has never been achieved. The aim of this study is to further investigate potential prognostic factors using a large single-center cohort to help determine the management strategy of NF-pNETs. METHODS: During the time period 1995 through 2013, 166 patients with NF-pNETs who underwent surgery in Samsung Medical Center were entered in a prospective database, and those factors thought to represent predictors of prognosis were tested in uni- and multivariate models. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 46.5 months; there was a maximum follow-up period of 217 months. The five-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates were 88.5% and 77.0%, respectively. The 2010 WHO classification was found to be the only prognostic factor which affects overall survival and disease-free survival in multivariate analysis. Also, pathologic tumor size and preoperative image tumor size correlated strongly with the WHO grades (p<0.001, and p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that 2010 WHO classification represents a valuable prognostic factor of NF-pNETs and tumor size on preoperative image correlated with WHO grade. In view of the foregoing, the preoperative image size is thought to represent a reasonable reference with regard to determination and development of treatment strategy of NF-pNETs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5845613
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Korean Association of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58456132018-03-13 Prognostic factors of non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor revisited: The value of WHO 2010 classification Bu, Jiyoung Youn, Sangmin Kwon, Wooil Jang, Kee Taek Han, Sanghyup Han, Sunjong You, Younghun Heo, Jin Seok Choi, Seong Ho Choi, Dong Wook Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg Original Article BACKGROUNDS/AIMS: Various factors have been reported as prognostic factors of non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-pNETs). There remains some controversy as to the factors which might actually serve to successfully prognosticate future manifestation and diagnosis of NF-pNETs. As well, consensus regarding management strategy has never been achieved. The aim of this study is to further investigate potential prognostic factors using a large single-center cohort to help determine the management strategy of NF-pNETs. METHODS: During the time period 1995 through 2013, 166 patients with NF-pNETs who underwent surgery in Samsung Medical Center were entered in a prospective database, and those factors thought to represent predictors of prognosis were tested in uni- and multivariate models. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 46.5 months; there was a maximum follow-up period of 217 months. The five-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates were 88.5% and 77.0%, respectively. The 2010 WHO classification was found to be the only prognostic factor which affects overall survival and disease-free survival in multivariate analysis. Also, pathologic tumor size and preoperative image tumor size correlated strongly with the WHO grades (p<0.001, and p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that 2010 WHO classification represents a valuable prognostic factor of NF-pNETs and tumor size on preoperative image correlated with WHO grade. In view of the foregoing, the preoperative image size is thought to represent a reasonable reference with regard to determination and development of treatment strategy of NF-pNETs. Korean Association of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery 2018-02 2018-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5845613/ /pubmed/29536058 http://dx.doi.org/10.14701/ahbps.2018.22.1.66 Text en Copyright © 2018 by The Korean Association of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Bu, Jiyoung
Youn, Sangmin
Kwon, Wooil
Jang, Kee Taek
Han, Sanghyup
Han, Sunjong
You, Younghun
Heo, Jin Seok
Choi, Seong Ho
Choi, Dong Wook
Prognostic factors of non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor revisited: The value of WHO 2010 classification
title Prognostic factors of non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor revisited: The value of WHO 2010 classification
title_full Prognostic factors of non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor revisited: The value of WHO 2010 classification
title_fullStr Prognostic factors of non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor revisited: The value of WHO 2010 classification
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic factors of non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor revisited: The value of WHO 2010 classification
title_short Prognostic factors of non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor revisited: The value of WHO 2010 classification
title_sort prognostic factors of non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor revisited: the value of who 2010 classification
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5845613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29536058
http://dx.doi.org/10.14701/ahbps.2018.22.1.66
work_keys_str_mv AT bujiyoung prognosticfactorsofnonfunctioningpancreaticneuroendocrinetumorrevisitedthevalueofwho2010classification
AT younsangmin prognosticfactorsofnonfunctioningpancreaticneuroendocrinetumorrevisitedthevalueofwho2010classification
AT kwonwooil prognosticfactorsofnonfunctioningpancreaticneuroendocrinetumorrevisitedthevalueofwho2010classification
AT jangkeetaek prognosticfactorsofnonfunctioningpancreaticneuroendocrinetumorrevisitedthevalueofwho2010classification
AT hansanghyup prognosticfactorsofnonfunctioningpancreaticneuroendocrinetumorrevisitedthevalueofwho2010classification
AT hansunjong prognosticfactorsofnonfunctioningpancreaticneuroendocrinetumorrevisitedthevalueofwho2010classification
AT youyounghun prognosticfactorsofnonfunctioningpancreaticneuroendocrinetumorrevisitedthevalueofwho2010classification
AT heojinseok prognosticfactorsofnonfunctioningpancreaticneuroendocrinetumorrevisitedthevalueofwho2010classification
AT choiseongho prognosticfactorsofnonfunctioningpancreaticneuroendocrinetumorrevisitedthevalueofwho2010classification
AT choidongwook prognosticfactorsofnonfunctioningpancreaticneuroendocrinetumorrevisitedthevalueofwho2010classification