Cargando…

Quantity Discrimination in Trained Lizards (Podarcis sicula)

Quantitative abilities have been reported in many animal species. Two main methods have been extensively used: spontaneous choice tests and training procedures. A recent study showed that ruin lizards are capable of spontaneously discriminating between the surface area of two food items of different...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miletto Petrazzini, Maria Elena, Bertolucci, Cristiano, Foà, Augusto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5845883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29563890
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00274
_version_ 1783305499608875008
author Miletto Petrazzini, Maria Elena
Bertolucci, Cristiano
Foà, Augusto
author_facet Miletto Petrazzini, Maria Elena
Bertolucci, Cristiano
Foà, Augusto
author_sort Miletto Petrazzini, Maria Elena
collection PubMed
description Quantitative abilities have been reported in many animal species. Two main methods have been extensively used: spontaneous choice tests and training procedures. A recent study showed that ruin lizards are capable of spontaneously discriminating between the surface area of two food items of different size, but failed when food was presented in sets of discrete items differing in number. In the present study, we used a training procedure to further investigate quantitative abilities in ruin lizards. Subjects were presented with two sets of yellow disks differing either in number (Experiment 1) or in area (Experiment 2) and were trained on different discriminations of increasing difficulty (1 vs. 4, 2 vs. 4, and 2 vs. 3). Results showed that lizards were more accurate in discriminating sets of discrete items differing in number than the area of two individual items, in contrast to what had earlier been observed in spontaneous choice tests. Although we cannot exclude other factors that affected the performance of ruin lizards, the poor accuracy here observed in both experiments might reflect a true limit in lizards’ quantitative abilities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5845883
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58458832018-03-21 Quantity Discrimination in Trained Lizards (Podarcis sicula) Miletto Petrazzini, Maria Elena Bertolucci, Cristiano Foà, Augusto Front Psychol Psychology Quantitative abilities have been reported in many animal species. Two main methods have been extensively used: spontaneous choice tests and training procedures. A recent study showed that ruin lizards are capable of spontaneously discriminating between the surface area of two food items of different size, but failed when food was presented in sets of discrete items differing in number. In the present study, we used a training procedure to further investigate quantitative abilities in ruin lizards. Subjects were presented with two sets of yellow disks differing either in number (Experiment 1) or in area (Experiment 2) and were trained on different discriminations of increasing difficulty (1 vs. 4, 2 vs. 4, and 2 vs. 3). Results showed that lizards were more accurate in discriminating sets of discrete items differing in number than the area of two individual items, in contrast to what had earlier been observed in spontaneous choice tests. Although we cannot exclude other factors that affected the performance of ruin lizards, the poor accuracy here observed in both experiments might reflect a true limit in lizards’ quantitative abilities. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5845883/ /pubmed/29563890 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00274 Text en Copyright © 2018 Miletto Petrazzini, Bertolucci and Foà. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Miletto Petrazzini, Maria Elena
Bertolucci, Cristiano
Foà, Augusto
Quantity Discrimination in Trained Lizards (Podarcis sicula)
title Quantity Discrimination in Trained Lizards (Podarcis sicula)
title_full Quantity Discrimination in Trained Lizards (Podarcis sicula)
title_fullStr Quantity Discrimination in Trained Lizards (Podarcis sicula)
title_full_unstemmed Quantity Discrimination in Trained Lizards (Podarcis sicula)
title_short Quantity Discrimination in Trained Lizards (Podarcis sicula)
title_sort quantity discrimination in trained lizards (podarcis sicula)
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5845883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29563890
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00274
work_keys_str_mv AT milettopetrazzinimariaelena quantitydiscriminationintrainedlizardspodarcissicula
AT bertoluccicristiano quantitydiscriminationintrainedlizardspodarcissicula
AT foaaugusto quantitydiscriminationintrainedlizardspodarcissicula