Cargando…
Strategies for clinical development of monoclonal antibodies beyond first-in-human trials: tested doses and rationale for dose selection
BACKGROUND: Our previous survey on first-in-human trials (FIHT) of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) showed that, due to their limited toxicity, the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) was only tentatively defined. METHODS: We identified, by MEDLINE search, articles on single-agent trials of mAbs with an FI...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5846071/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29438365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2017.473 |
_version_ | 1783305533147578368 |
---|---|
author | Viala, Marie Vinches, Marie Alexandre, Marie Mollevi, Caroline Durigova, Anna Hayaoui, Nadia Homicsko, Krisztian Cuenant, Alice Gongora, Céline Gianni, Luca Tosi, Diego |
author_facet | Viala, Marie Vinches, Marie Alexandre, Marie Mollevi, Caroline Durigova, Anna Hayaoui, Nadia Homicsko, Krisztian Cuenant, Alice Gongora, Céline Gianni, Luca Tosi, Diego |
author_sort | Viala, Marie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Our previous survey on first-in-human trials (FIHT) of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) showed that, due to their limited toxicity, the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) was only tentatively defined. METHODS: We identified, by MEDLINE search, articles on single-agent trials of mAbs with an FIHT included in our previous survey. For each mAb, we examined tested dose(s) and dose selection rationale in non-FIHTs (NFIHTs). We also assessed the correlation between doses tested in the registration trials (RTs) of all FDA-approved mAbs and the corresponding FIHT results. RESULTS: In the 37 dose-escalation NFIHTs, the RP2D indication was still poorly defined. In phase II–III NFIHTs (n=103 on 37 mAbs), the FIHT RP2D was the only dose tested for five mAbs. For 16 mAbs, only doses different from the FIHT RP2D or the maximum administered dose (MAD) were tested and the dose selection rationale infrequently indicated. In the 60 RTs on 27 FDA-approved mAbs with available FIHT, the FIHT RP2D was tested only for two mAbs, and RT doses were much lower than the FIHT MAD. CONCLUSIONS: The rationale beyond dose selection in phase II and III trials of mAbs is often unclear in published articles and not based on FIHT data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5846071 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58460712019-03-06 Strategies for clinical development of monoclonal antibodies beyond first-in-human trials: tested doses and rationale for dose selection Viala, Marie Vinches, Marie Alexandre, Marie Mollevi, Caroline Durigova, Anna Hayaoui, Nadia Homicsko, Krisztian Cuenant, Alice Gongora, Céline Gianni, Luca Tosi, Diego Br J Cancer Translational Therapeutics BACKGROUND: Our previous survey on first-in-human trials (FIHT) of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) showed that, due to their limited toxicity, the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) was only tentatively defined. METHODS: We identified, by MEDLINE search, articles on single-agent trials of mAbs with an FIHT included in our previous survey. For each mAb, we examined tested dose(s) and dose selection rationale in non-FIHTs (NFIHTs). We also assessed the correlation between doses tested in the registration trials (RTs) of all FDA-approved mAbs and the corresponding FIHT results. RESULTS: In the 37 dose-escalation NFIHTs, the RP2D indication was still poorly defined. In phase II–III NFIHTs (n=103 on 37 mAbs), the FIHT RP2D was the only dose tested for five mAbs. For 16 mAbs, only doses different from the FIHT RP2D or the maximum administered dose (MAD) were tested and the dose selection rationale infrequently indicated. In the 60 RTs on 27 FDA-approved mAbs with available FIHT, the FIHT RP2D was tested only for two mAbs, and RT doses were much lower than the FIHT MAD. CONCLUSIONS: The rationale beyond dose selection in phase II and III trials of mAbs is often unclear in published articles and not based on FIHT data. Nature Publishing Group 2018-03-06 2018-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5846071/ /pubmed/29438365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2017.473 Text en Copyright © 2018 Cancer Research UK http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Translational Therapeutics Viala, Marie Vinches, Marie Alexandre, Marie Mollevi, Caroline Durigova, Anna Hayaoui, Nadia Homicsko, Krisztian Cuenant, Alice Gongora, Céline Gianni, Luca Tosi, Diego Strategies for clinical development of monoclonal antibodies beyond first-in-human trials: tested doses and rationale for dose selection |
title | Strategies for clinical development of monoclonal antibodies beyond first-in-human trials: tested doses and rationale for dose selection |
title_full | Strategies for clinical development of monoclonal antibodies beyond first-in-human trials: tested doses and rationale for dose selection |
title_fullStr | Strategies for clinical development of monoclonal antibodies beyond first-in-human trials: tested doses and rationale for dose selection |
title_full_unstemmed | Strategies for clinical development of monoclonal antibodies beyond first-in-human trials: tested doses and rationale for dose selection |
title_short | Strategies for clinical development of monoclonal antibodies beyond first-in-human trials: tested doses and rationale for dose selection |
title_sort | strategies for clinical development of monoclonal antibodies beyond first-in-human trials: tested doses and rationale for dose selection |
topic | Translational Therapeutics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5846071/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29438365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2017.473 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vialamarie strategiesforclinicaldevelopmentofmonoclonalantibodiesbeyondfirstinhumantrialstesteddosesandrationalefordoseselection AT vinchesmarie strategiesforclinicaldevelopmentofmonoclonalantibodiesbeyondfirstinhumantrialstesteddosesandrationalefordoseselection AT alexandremarie strategiesforclinicaldevelopmentofmonoclonalantibodiesbeyondfirstinhumantrialstesteddosesandrationalefordoseselection AT mollevicaroline strategiesforclinicaldevelopmentofmonoclonalantibodiesbeyondfirstinhumantrialstesteddosesandrationalefordoseselection AT durigovaanna strategiesforclinicaldevelopmentofmonoclonalantibodiesbeyondfirstinhumantrialstesteddosesandrationalefordoseselection AT hayaouinadia strategiesforclinicaldevelopmentofmonoclonalantibodiesbeyondfirstinhumantrialstesteddosesandrationalefordoseselection AT homicskokrisztian strategiesforclinicaldevelopmentofmonoclonalantibodiesbeyondfirstinhumantrialstesteddosesandrationalefordoseselection AT cuenantalice strategiesforclinicaldevelopmentofmonoclonalantibodiesbeyondfirstinhumantrialstesteddosesandrationalefordoseselection AT gongoraceline strategiesforclinicaldevelopmentofmonoclonalantibodiesbeyondfirstinhumantrialstesteddosesandrationalefordoseselection AT gianniluca strategiesforclinicaldevelopmentofmonoclonalantibodiesbeyondfirstinhumantrialstesteddosesandrationalefordoseselection AT tosidiego strategiesforclinicaldevelopmentofmonoclonalantibodiesbeyondfirstinhumantrialstesteddosesandrationalefordoseselection |