Cargando…

Dynamic fetal cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging using Doppler ultrasound gating

BACKGROUND: Fetal cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging may provide a valuable adjunct to fetal echocardiography in the evaluation of congenital cardiovascular pathologies. However, dynamic fetal CMR is difficult due to the lack of direct in-utero cardiac gating. The aim of this study was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kording, Fabian, Yamamura, Jin, de Sousa, Manuela Tavares, Ruprecht, Christian, Hedström, Erik, Aletras, Anthony H., Ellen Grant, P., Powell, Andrew J., Fehrs, Kai, Adam, Gerhard, Kooijman, Hendrik, Schoennagel, Bjoern P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5846256/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29530064
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-018-0440-4
_version_ 1783305552998170624
author Kording, Fabian
Yamamura, Jin
de Sousa, Manuela Tavares
Ruprecht, Christian
Hedström, Erik
Aletras, Anthony H.
Ellen Grant, P.
Powell, Andrew J.
Fehrs, Kai
Adam, Gerhard
Kooijman, Hendrik
Schoennagel, Bjoern P.
author_facet Kording, Fabian
Yamamura, Jin
de Sousa, Manuela Tavares
Ruprecht, Christian
Hedström, Erik
Aletras, Anthony H.
Ellen Grant, P.
Powell, Andrew J.
Fehrs, Kai
Adam, Gerhard
Kooijman, Hendrik
Schoennagel, Bjoern P.
author_sort Kording, Fabian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Fetal cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging may provide a valuable adjunct to fetal echocardiography in the evaluation of congenital cardiovascular pathologies. However, dynamic fetal CMR is difficult due to the lack of direct in-utero cardiac gating. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of a newly developed Doppler ultrasound (DUS) device in humans for fetal CMR gating. METHODS: Fifteen fetuses (gestational age 30–39 weeks) were examined using 1.5 T CMR scanners at three different imaging sites. A newly developed CMR-compatible DUS device was used to generate gating signals from fetal cardiac motion. Gated dynamic balanced steady-state free precession images were acquired in 4-chamber and short-axis cardiac views. Gating signals during data acquisition were analyzed with respect to trigger variability and sensitivity. Image quality was assessed by measuring endocardial blurring (EB) and by image evaluation using a 4-point scale. Left ventricular (LV) volumetry was performed using the single-plane ellipsoid model. RESULTS: Gating signals from the fetal heart were detected with a variability of 26 ± 22 ms and a sensitivity of trigger detection of 96 ± 4%. EB was 2.9 ± 0.6 pixels (4-chamber) and 2.5 ± 0.1 pixels (short axis). Image quality scores were 3.6 ± 0.6 (overall), 3.4 ± 0.7 (mitral valve), 3.4 ± 0.7 (foramen ovale), 3.6 ± 0.7 (atrial septum), 3.7 ± 0.5 (papillary muscles), 3.8 ± 0.4 (differentiation myocardium/lumen), 3.7 ± 0.5 (differentiation myocardium/lung), and 3.9 ± 0.4 (systolic myocardial thickening). Inter-observer agreement for the scores was moderate to very good (kappa 0.57–0.84) for all structures. LV volumetry revealed mean values of 2.8 ± 1.2 ml (end-diastolic volume), 0.9 ± 0.4 ml (end systolic volume), 1.9 ± 0.8 ml (stroke volume), and 69.1 ± 8.4% (ejection fraction). CONCLUSION: High-quality dynamic fetal CMR was successfully performed using a newly developed DUS device for direct fetal cardiac gating. This technique has the potential to improve the utility of fetal CMR in the evaluation of congenital pathologies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5846256
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58462562018-03-15 Dynamic fetal cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging using Doppler ultrasound gating Kording, Fabian Yamamura, Jin de Sousa, Manuela Tavares Ruprecht, Christian Hedström, Erik Aletras, Anthony H. Ellen Grant, P. Powell, Andrew J. Fehrs, Kai Adam, Gerhard Kooijman, Hendrik Schoennagel, Bjoern P. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Research BACKGROUND: Fetal cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging may provide a valuable adjunct to fetal echocardiography in the evaluation of congenital cardiovascular pathologies. However, dynamic fetal CMR is difficult due to the lack of direct in-utero cardiac gating. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of a newly developed Doppler ultrasound (DUS) device in humans for fetal CMR gating. METHODS: Fifteen fetuses (gestational age 30–39 weeks) were examined using 1.5 T CMR scanners at three different imaging sites. A newly developed CMR-compatible DUS device was used to generate gating signals from fetal cardiac motion. Gated dynamic balanced steady-state free precession images were acquired in 4-chamber and short-axis cardiac views. Gating signals during data acquisition were analyzed with respect to trigger variability and sensitivity. Image quality was assessed by measuring endocardial blurring (EB) and by image evaluation using a 4-point scale. Left ventricular (LV) volumetry was performed using the single-plane ellipsoid model. RESULTS: Gating signals from the fetal heart were detected with a variability of 26 ± 22 ms and a sensitivity of trigger detection of 96 ± 4%. EB was 2.9 ± 0.6 pixels (4-chamber) and 2.5 ± 0.1 pixels (short axis). Image quality scores were 3.6 ± 0.6 (overall), 3.4 ± 0.7 (mitral valve), 3.4 ± 0.7 (foramen ovale), 3.6 ± 0.7 (atrial septum), 3.7 ± 0.5 (papillary muscles), 3.8 ± 0.4 (differentiation myocardium/lumen), 3.7 ± 0.5 (differentiation myocardium/lung), and 3.9 ± 0.4 (systolic myocardial thickening). Inter-observer agreement for the scores was moderate to very good (kappa 0.57–0.84) for all structures. LV volumetry revealed mean values of 2.8 ± 1.2 ml (end-diastolic volume), 0.9 ± 0.4 ml (end systolic volume), 1.9 ± 0.8 ml (stroke volume), and 69.1 ± 8.4% (ejection fraction). CONCLUSION: High-quality dynamic fetal CMR was successfully performed using a newly developed DUS device for direct fetal cardiac gating. This technique has the potential to improve the utility of fetal CMR in the evaluation of congenital pathologies. BioMed Central 2018-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5846256/ /pubmed/29530064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-018-0440-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Kording, Fabian
Yamamura, Jin
de Sousa, Manuela Tavares
Ruprecht, Christian
Hedström, Erik
Aletras, Anthony H.
Ellen Grant, P.
Powell, Andrew J.
Fehrs, Kai
Adam, Gerhard
Kooijman, Hendrik
Schoennagel, Bjoern P.
Dynamic fetal cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging using Doppler ultrasound gating
title Dynamic fetal cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging using Doppler ultrasound gating
title_full Dynamic fetal cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging using Doppler ultrasound gating
title_fullStr Dynamic fetal cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging using Doppler ultrasound gating
title_full_unstemmed Dynamic fetal cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging using Doppler ultrasound gating
title_short Dynamic fetal cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging using Doppler ultrasound gating
title_sort dynamic fetal cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging using doppler ultrasound gating
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5846256/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29530064
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-018-0440-4
work_keys_str_mv AT kordingfabian dynamicfetalcardiovascularmagneticresonanceimagingusingdopplerultrasoundgating
AT yamamurajin dynamicfetalcardiovascularmagneticresonanceimagingusingdopplerultrasoundgating
AT desousamanuelatavares dynamicfetalcardiovascularmagneticresonanceimagingusingdopplerultrasoundgating
AT ruprechtchristian dynamicfetalcardiovascularmagneticresonanceimagingusingdopplerultrasoundgating
AT hedstromerik dynamicfetalcardiovascularmagneticresonanceimagingusingdopplerultrasoundgating
AT aletrasanthonyh dynamicfetalcardiovascularmagneticresonanceimagingusingdopplerultrasoundgating
AT ellengrantp dynamicfetalcardiovascularmagneticresonanceimagingusingdopplerultrasoundgating
AT powellandrewj dynamicfetalcardiovascularmagneticresonanceimagingusingdopplerultrasoundgating
AT fehrskai dynamicfetalcardiovascularmagneticresonanceimagingusingdopplerultrasoundgating
AT adamgerhard dynamicfetalcardiovascularmagneticresonanceimagingusingdopplerultrasoundgating
AT kooijmanhendrik dynamicfetalcardiovascularmagneticresonanceimagingusingdopplerultrasoundgating
AT schoennagelbjoernp dynamicfetalcardiovascularmagneticresonanceimagingusingdopplerultrasoundgating