Cargando…
Dynamic fetal cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging using Doppler ultrasound gating
BACKGROUND: Fetal cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging may provide a valuable adjunct to fetal echocardiography in the evaluation of congenital cardiovascular pathologies. However, dynamic fetal CMR is difficult due to the lack of direct in-utero cardiac gating. The aim of this study was...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5846256/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29530064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-018-0440-4 |
_version_ | 1783305552998170624 |
---|---|
author | Kording, Fabian Yamamura, Jin de Sousa, Manuela Tavares Ruprecht, Christian Hedström, Erik Aletras, Anthony H. Ellen Grant, P. Powell, Andrew J. Fehrs, Kai Adam, Gerhard Kooijman, Hendrik Schoennagel, Bjoern P. |
author_facet | Kording, Fabian Yamamura, Jin de Sousa, Manuela Tavares Ruprecht, Christian Hedström, Erik Aletras, Anthony H. Ellen Grant, P. Powell, Andrew J. Fehrs, Kai Adam, Gerhard Kooijman, Hendrik Schoennagel, Bjoern P. |
author_sort | Kording, Fabian |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Fetal cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging may provide a valuable adjunct to fetal echocardiography in the evaluation of congenital cardiovascular pathologies. However, dynamic fetal CMR is difficult due to the lack of direct in-utero cardiac gating. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of a newly developed Doppler ultrasound (DUS) device in humans for fetal CMR gating. METHODS: Fifteen fetuses (gestational age 30–39 weeks) were examined using 1.5 T CMR scanners at three different imaging sites. A newly developed CMR-compatible DUS device was used to generate gating signals from fetal cardiac motion. Gated dynamic balanced steady-state free precession images were acquired in 4-chamber and short-axis cardiac views. Gating signals during data acquisition were analyzed with respect to trigger variability and sensitivity. Image quality was assessed by measuring endocardial blurring (EB) and by image evaluation using a 4-point scale. Left ventricular (LV) volumetry was performed using the single-plane ellipsoid model. RESULTS: Gating signals from the fetal heart were detected with a variability of 26 ± 22 ms and a sensitivity of trigger detection of 96 ± 4%. EB was 2.9 ± 0.6 pixels (4-chamber) and 2.5 ± 0.1 pixels (short axis). Image quality scores were 3.6 ± 0.6 (overall), 3.4 ± 0.7 (mitral valve), 3.4 ± 0.7 (foramen ovale), 3.6 ± 0.7 (atrial septum), 3.7 ± 0.5 (papillary muscles), 3.8 ± 0.4 (differentiation myocardium/lumen), 3.7 ± 0.5 (differentiation myocardium/lung), and 3.9 ± 0.4 (systolic myocardial thickening). Inter-observer agreement for the scores was moderate to very good (kappa 0.57–0.84) for all structures. LV volumetry revealed mean values of 2.8 ± 1.2 ml (end-diastolic volume), 0.9 ± 0.4 ml (end systolic volume), 1.9 ± 0.8 ml (stroke volume), and 69.1 ± 8.4% (ejection fraction). CONCLUSION: High-quality dynamic fetal CMR was successfully performed using a newly developed DUS device for direct fetal cardiac gating. This technique has the potential to improve the utility of fetal CMR in the evaluation of congenital pathologies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5846256 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58462562018-03-15 Dynamic fetal cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging using Doppler ultrasound gating Kording, Fabian Yamamura, Jin de Sousa, Manuela Tavares Ruprecht, Christian Hedström, Erik Aletras, Anthony H. Ellen Grant, P. Powell, Andrew J. Fehrs, Kai Adam, Gerhard Kooijman, Hendrik Schoennagel, Bjoern P. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Research BACKGROUND: Fetal cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging may provide a valuable adjunct to fetal echocardiography in the evaluation of congenital cardiovascular pathologies. However, dynamic fetal CMR is difficult due to the lack of direct in-utero cardiac gating. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of a newly developed Doppler ultrasound (DUS) device in humans for fetal CMR gating. METHODS: Fifteen fetuses (gestational age 30–39 weeks) were examined using 1.5 T CMR scanners at three different imaging sites. A newly developed CMR-compatible DUS device was used to generate gating signals from fetal cardiac motion. Gated dynamic balanced steady-state free precession images were acquired in 4-chamber and short-axis cardiac views. Gating signals during data acquisition were analyzed with respect to trigger variability and sensitivity. Image quality was assessed by measuring endocardial blurring (EB) and by image evaluation using a 4-point scale. Left ventricular (LV) volumetry was performed using the single-plane ellipsoid model. RESULTS: Gating signals from the fetal heart were detected with a variability of 26 ± 22 ms and a sensitivity of trigger detection of 96 ± 4%. EB was 2.9 ± 0.6 pixels (4-chamber) and 2.5 ± 0.1 pixels (short axis). Image quality scores were 3.6 ± 0.6 (overall), 3.4 ± 0.7 (mitral valve), 3.4 ± 0.7 (foramen ovale), 3.6 ± 0.7 (atrial septum), 3.7 ± 0.5 (papillary muscles), 3.8 ± 0.4 (differentiation myocardium/lumen), 3.7 ± 0.5 (differentiation myocardium/lung), and 3.9 ± 0.4 (systolic myocardial thickening). Inter-observer agreement for the scores was moderate to very good (kappa 0.57–0.84) for all structures. LV volumetry revealed mean values of 2.8 ± 1.2 ml (end-diastolic volume), 0.9 ± 0.4 ml (end systolic volume), 1.9 ± 0.8 ml (stroke volume), and 69.1 ± 8.4% (ejection fraction). CONCLUSION: High-quality dynamic fetal CMR was successfully performed using a newly developed DUS device for direct fetal cardiac gating. This technique has the potential to improve the utility of fetal CMR in the evaluation of congenital pathologies. BioMed Central 2018-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5846256/ /pubmed/29530064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-018-0440-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Kording, Fabian Yamamura, Jin de Sousa, Manuela Tavares Ruprecht, Christian Hedström, Erik Aletras, Anthony H. Ellen Grant, P. Powell, Andrew J. Fehrs, Kai Adam, Gerhard Kooijman, Hendrik Schoennagel, Bjoern P. Dynamic fetal cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging using Doppler ultrasound gating |
title | Dynamic fetal cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging using Doppler ultrasound gating |
title_full | Dynamic fetal cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging using Doppler ultrasound gating |
title_fullStr | Dynamic fetal cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging using Doppler ultrasound gating |
title_full_unstemmed | Dynamic fetal cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging using Doppler ultrasound gating |
title_short | Dynamic fetal cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging using Doppler ultrasound gating |
title_sort | dynamic fetal cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging using doppler ultrasound gating |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5846256/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29530064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-018-0440-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kordingfabian dynamicfetalcardiovascularmagneticresonanceimagingusingdopplerultrasoundgating AT yamamurajin dynamicfetalcardiovascularmagneticresonanceimagingusingdopplerultrasoundgating AT desousamanuelatavares dynamicfetalcardiovascularmagneticresonanceimagingusingdopplerultrasoundgating AT ruprechtchristian dynamicfetalcardiovascularmagneticresonanceimagingusingdopplerultrasoundgating AT hedstromerik dynamicfetalcardiovascularmagneticresonanceimagingusingdopplerultrasoundgating AT aletrasanthonyh dynamicfetalcardiovascularmagneticresonanceimagingusingdopplerultrasoundgating AT ellengrantp dynamicfetalcardiovascularmagneticresonanceimagingusingdopplerultrasoundgating AT powellandrewj dynamicfetalcardiovascularmagneticresonanceimagingusingdopplerultrasoundgating AT fehrskai dynamicfetalcardiovascularmagneticresonanceimagingusingdopplerultrasoundgating AT adamgerhard dynamicfetalcardiovascularmagneticresonanceimagingusingdopplerultrasoundgating AT kooijmanhendrik dynamicfetalcardiovascularmagneticresonanceimagingusingdopplerultrasoundgating AT schoennagelbjoernp dynamicfetalcardiovascularmagneticresonanceimagingusingdopplerultrasoundgating |