Cargando…
Swirling Flow and Wall Shear: Evaluating the BioMimics 3D Helical Centerline Stent for the Femoropopliteal Segment
The BioMimics 3D self-expanding nitinol stent represents a strategy for femoropopliteal intervention that is alternative or complementary to deployment of drug-coated stents or balloons. Whereas conventional straight stents reduce arterial curvature and disturb blood flow, creating areas of low wall...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5846357/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29682350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9795174 |
_version_ | 1783305572666310656 |
---|---|
author | Sullivan, Timothy M. Zeller, Thomas Nakamura, Masato Caro, Colin G. Lichtenberg, Michael |
author_facet | Sullivan, Timothy M. Zeller, Thomas Nakamura, Masato Caro, Colin G. Lichtenberg, Michael |
author_sort | Sullivan, Timothy M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The BioMimics 3D self-expanding nitinol stent represents a strategy for femoropopliteal intervention that is alternative or complementary to deployment of drug-coated stents or balloons. Whereas conventional straight stents reduce arterial curvature and disturb blood flow, creating areas of low wall shear, where neointimal hyperplasia predominantly develops, the helical centerline geometry of the BioMimics 3D maintains or imparts arterial curvature, promotes laminar swirling blood flow, and elevates wall shear to protect against atherosclerosis and restenosis. In the multicenter randomized MIMICS trial, treatment of femoropopliteal disease with the BioMimics 3D (n = 50) significantly improved 2-year primary patency (log-rank test p = 0.05) versus a control straight stent (n = 26), with no cases of clinically driven target lesion revascularization between 12 and 24 months (log-rank test p = 0.03 versus controls). In geometric X-ray analysis, the BioMimics stent was significantly more effective in imparting a helical shape even when the arterial segment was moderately to severely calcified. Computational fluid dynamics analysis showed that average wall shear was significantly higher with the helical centerline stent (1.13 ± 0.13 Pa versus 1.06 ± 0.12 Pa, p = 0.05). A 271-patient multicenter international MIMICS-2 trial and a 500-patient real-world MIMICS-3D registry are underway. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5846357 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58463572018-04-22 Swirling Flow and Wall Shear: Evaluating the BioMimics 3D Helical Centerline Stent for the Femoropopliteal Segment Sullivan, Timothy M. Zeller, Thomas Nakamura, Masato Caro, Colin G. Lichtenberg, Michael Int J Vasc Med Review Article The BioMimics 3D self-expanding nitinol stent represents a strategy for femoropopliteal intervention that is alternative or complementary to deployment of drug-coated stents or balloons. Whereas conventional straight stents reduce arterial curvature and disturb blood flow, creating areas of low wall shear, where neointimal hyperplasia predominantly develops, the helical centerline geometry of the BioMimics 3D maintains or imparts arterial curvature, promotes laminar swirling blood flow, and elevates wall shear to protect against atherosclerosis and restenosis. In the multicenter randomized MIMICS trial, treatment of femoropopliteal disease with the BioMimics 3D (n = 50) significantly improved 2-year primary patency (log-rank test p = 0.05) versus a control straight stent (n = 26), with no cases of clinically driven target lesion revascularization between 12 and 24 months (log-rank test p = 0.03 versus controls). In geometric X-ray analysis, the BioMimics stent was significantly more effective in imparting a helical shape even when the arterial segment was moderately to severely calcified. Computational fluid dynamics analysis showed that average wall shear was significantly higher with the helical centerline stent (1.13 ± 0.13 Pa versus 1.06 ± 0.12 Pa, p = 0.05). A 271-patient multicenter international MIMICS-2 trial and a 500-patient real-world MIMICS-3D registry are underway. Hindawi 2018-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5846357/ /pubmed/29682350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9795174 Text en Copyright © 2018 Timothy M. Sullivan et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Sullivan, Timothy M. Zeller, Thomas Nakamura, Masato Caro, Colin G. Lichtenberg, Michael Swirling Flow and Wall Shear: Evaluating the BioMimics 3D Helical Centerline Stent for the Femoropopliteal Segment |
title | Swirling Flow and Wall Shear: Evaluating the BioMimics 3D Helical Centerline Stent for the Femoropopliteal Segment |
title_full | Swirling Flow and Wall Shear: Evaluating the BioMimics 3D Helical Centerline Stent for the Femoropopliteal Segment |
title_fullStr | Swirling Flow and Wall Shear: Evaluating the BioMimics 3D Helical Centerline Stent for the Femoropopliteal Segment |
title_full_unstemmed | Swirling Flow and Wall Shear: Evaluating the BioMimics 3D Helical Centerline Stent for the Femoropopliteal Segment |
title_short | Swirling Flow and Wall Shear: Evaluating the BioMimics 3D Helical Centerline Stent for the Femoropopliteal Segment |
title_sort | swirling flow and wall shear: evaluating the biomimics 3d helical centerline stent for the femoropopliteal segment |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5846357/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29682350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9795174 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sullivantimothym swirlingflowandwallshearevaluatingthebiomimics3dhelicalcenterlinestentforthefemoropoplitealsegment AT zellerthomas swirlingflowandwallshearevaluatingthebiomimics3dhelicalcenterlinestentforthefemoropoplitealsegment AT nakamuramasato swirlingflowandwallshearevaluatingthebiomimics3dhelicalcenterlinestentforthefemoropoplitealsegment AT carocoling swirlingflowandwallshearevaluatingthebiomimics3dhelicalcenterlinestentforthefemoropoplitealsegment AT lichtenbergmichael swirlingflowandwallshearevaluatingthebiomimics3dhelicalcenterlinestentforthefemoropoplitealsegment |