Cargando…

Swirling Flow and Wall Shear: Evaluating the BioMimics 3D Helical Centerline Stent for the Femoropopliteal Segment

The BioMimics 3D self-expanding nitinol stent represents a strategy for femoropopliteal intervention that is alternative or complementary to deployment of drug-coated stents or balloons. Whereas conventional straight stents reduce arterial curvature and disturb blood flow, creating areas of low wall...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sullivan, Timothy M., Zeller, Thomas, Nakamura, Masato, Caro, Colin G., Lichtenberg, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5846357/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29682350
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9795174
_version_ 1783305572666310656
author Sullivan, Timothy M.
Zeller, Thomas
Nakamura, Masato
Caro, Colin G.
Lichtenberg, Michael
author_facet Sullivan, Timothy M.
Zeller, Thomas
Nakamura, Masato
Caro, Colin G.
Lichtenberg, Michael
author_sort Sullivan, Timothy M.
collection PubMed
description The BioMimics 3D self-expanding nitinol stent represents a strategy for femoropopliteal intervention that is alternative or complementary to deployment of drug-coated stents or balloons. Whereas conventional straight stents reduce arterial curvature and disturb blood flow, creating areas of low wall shear, where neointimal hyperplasia predominantly develops, the helical centerline geometry of the BioMimics 3D maintains or imparts arterial curvature, promotes laminar swirling blood flow, and elevates wall shear to protect against atherosclerosis and restenosis. In the multicenter randomized MIMICS trial, treatment of femoropopliteal disease with the BioMimics 3D (n = 50) significantly improved 2-year primary patency (log-rank test p = 0.05) versus a control straight stent (n = 26), with no cases of clinically driven target lesion revascularization between 12 and 24 months (log-rank test p = 0.03 versus controls). In geometric X-ray analysis, the BioMimics stent was significantly more effective in imparting a helical shape even when the arterial segment was moderately to severely calcified. Computational fluid dynamics analysis showed that average wall shear was significantly higher with the helical centerline stent (1.13 ± 0.13 Pa versus 1.06 ± 0.12 Pa, p = 0.05). A 271-patient multicenter international MIMICS-2 trial and a 500-patient real-world MIMICS-3D registry are underway.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5846357
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58463572018-04-22 Swirling Flow and Wall Shear: Evaluating the BioMimics 3D Helical Centerline Stent for the Femoropopliteal Segment Sullivan, Timothy M. Zeller, Thomas Nakamura, Masato Caro, Colin G. Lichtenberg, Michael Int J Vasc Med Review Article The BioMimics 3D self-expanding nitinol stent represents a strategy for femoropopliteal intervention that is alternative or complementary to deployment of drug-coated stents or balloons. Whereas conventional straight stents reduce arterial curvature and disturb blood flow, creating areas of low wall shear, where neointimal hyperplasia predominantly develops, the helical centerline geometry of the BioMimics 3D maintains or imparts arterial curvature, promotes laminar swirling blood flow, and elevates wall shear to protect against atherosclerosis and restenosis. In the multicenter randomized MIMICS trial, treatment of femoropopliteal disease with the BioMimics 3D (n = 50) significantly improved 2-year primary patency (log-rank test p = 0.05) versus a control straight stent (n = 26), with no cases of clinically driven target lesion revascularization between 12 and 24 months (log-rank test p = 0.03 versus controls). In geometric X-ray analysis, the BioMimics stent was significantly more effective in imparting a helical shape even when the arterial segment was moderately to severely calcified. Computational fluid dynamics analysis showed that average wall shear was significantly higher with the helical centerline stent (1.13 ± 0.13 Pa versus 1.06 ± 0.12 Pa, p = 0.05). A 271-patient multicenter international MIMICS-2 trial and a 500-patient real-world MIMICS-3D registry are underway. Hindawi 2018-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5846357/ /pubmed/29682350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9795174 Text en Copyright © 2018 Timothy M. Sullivan et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Sullivan, Timothy M.
Zeller, Thomas
Nakamura, Masato
Caro, Colin G.
Lichtenberg, Michael
Swirling Flow and Wall Shear: Evaluating the BioMimics 3D Helical Centerline Stent for the Femoropopliteal Segment
title Swirling Flow and Wall Shear: Evaluating the BioMimics 3D Helical Centerline Stent for the Femoropopliteal Segment
title_full Swirling Flow and Wall Shear: Evaluating the BioMimics 3D Helical Centerline Stent for the Femoropopliteal Segment
title_fullStr Swirling Flow and Wall Shear: Evaluating the BioMimics 3D Helical Centerline Stent for the Femoropopliteal Segment
title_full_unstemmed Swirling Flow and Wall Shear: Evaluating the BioMimics 3D Helical Centerline Stent for the Femoropopliteal Segment
title_short Swirling Flow and Wall Shear: Evaluating the BioMimics 3D Helical Centerline Stent for the Femoropopliteal Segment
title_sort swirling flow and wall shear: evaluating the biomimics 3d helical centerline stent for the femoropopliteal segment
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5846357/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29682350
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9795174
work_keys_str_mv AT sullivantimothym swirlingflowandwallshearevaluatingthebiomimics3dhelicalcenterlinestentforthefemoropoplitealsegment
AT zellerthomas swirlingflowandwallshearevaluatingthebiomimics3dhelicalcenterlinestentforthefemoropoplitealsegment
AT nakamuramasato swirlingflowandwallshearevaluatingthebiomimics3dhelicalcenterlinestentforthefemoropoplitealsegment
AT carocoling swirlingflowandwallshearevaluatingthebiomimics3dhelicalcenterlinestentforthefemoropoplitealsegment
AT lichtenbergmichael swirlingflowandwallshearevaluatingthebiomimics3dhelicalcenterlinestentforthefemoropoplitealsegment